|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Martin Gardner. We need more of his kind.
24 years.
List of Martin Gardner Mathematical Games columns[^]
I believe he mentions the semordnilap in the September 1964 issue. It's stored up in the attic with my collection of 30+ years of National Geographic.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
I read many of his books as a child.
|
|
|
|
|
the opposite of an operating system would be windows 10
an operating system implies you control and have the equipment do what you want it to do,
windows 10, when it's not wankin doing hidden stuff to itself "updating" itself loves to reset and hide (if not totally remove) settings, decide if something [that ran fine yesterday] will still work today, unilterally decide if you can find/see/read/write your files (again if indeed they still exist) ...
proof complete.
<< Signature removed due to copyright violations >>
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it's a shame those updates don't let our OSs have security flaws like *nix systems do.
|
|
|
|
|
lopatir wrote: an operating system implies you control
It's called an operating system, ergo it operates.
If you had to do the operating, it would be called operated system 
I think you need to adjust your expectations 
|
|
|
|
|
Ill preface this with that the following is nothing new and language X was gonna be the Y, but here goes.
Java is supposed to be this language where you can deploy anywhere, except it's you still need to compile for a platform and ship the bytecode file. (please feel free to correct any ignorance)
So when a few articles came out on Webassembly last week with the mozilla documentation release of 1.0, and history repeating. "It will run anywhere" that some runtime has been written for it just as java runtime is required writing for the platform that you want to run it on.
I feel like I am missing something not knowing enough on how C and Assembler works that we can't just compile to those languages and ship?
Oh, no, if not already done, someone is going to make an OS in webassemply aren't they?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I feel like I am missing something not knowing enough on how C and Assembler works that we can't just compile to those languages and ship?
Correct. However you neeed the various compiling tools and, above all, you have to recompile for all the different platforms every time.
|
|
|
|
|
maze3 wrote: "It will run anywhere" that some runtime has been written for it just as java runtime is required writing for the platform that you want to run it on.
It's unavoidable. Computers only run machine code, which is inherently non-portable. If you make a translation layer, well then that still only works on platforms that have had that ported to them. C is nowhere closer to a solution, and assembly is non-portable.
There is no solution of the kind that you want.
|
|
|
|
|
I hate to break it to you, but you're getting old. The obvious sign is that you look at the latest shiny thing and think "yeah, we already tried that".
However, in this case WebAssembly is a little different from Java in that, at the time, hardware and systems weren't up to the task. For Java to work everywhere you had to ensure all your users had the correct version of Java installed. Even if you got over that, Java itself was slow, a memory hog, and the UI was always so clunky and dated. It was a terrible user experience for everyone.
Fast forward and we're in a world where the vast majority of users have browsers that auto-update, so versioning is not as big a deal. Bandwidth is a little better than 20 years ago, as is CPU power, so downloads and execution time are not the issues they were.
We're also in a world where we already consume many of our apps online, whereas 20 years ago it was a bit of an ask to assume people would be happy and able to download Java apps and run them on thin clients (I remember sitting in on a very painful demo in 1996).
Basically: instead of trying to convince everyone to move in the direction of the solution Sun was providing (a solution to a problem people didn't think they had), we're now looking for solutions to problems we know very well that we have: We're executing applications on thin clients served from remote mainframes and everything is in place, the market is here, it's part of our daily life, and it's all based on JavaScript. Because JavaScript was the only language everyone hated the least and managed to keep its head down long enough to survive. But it's slow. Not as slow as Java was, but to get to the next step we need something better than a scripting engine to run our apps.
Hence WebAssembly.
I hope it works. I truly do. I never, ever want to know how to code in raw WebAssembly - that's what compilers are for - but I want to know I can code in whatever language I want to and it will be compiled into a language that will run as fast as possible on every device my users will be using.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
TLDR; WebAssembly is a universal "machine language" that runs within modern browsers that act as the CPUs that will run that universal "machine language".
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
maze3 wrote: Java is supposed to be this language where you can deploy anywhere, except it's you still need to compile for a platform and ship the bytecode file. (please feel free to correct any ignorance)
The gist is there, but you only need to compile once, and not for a specific platform since the JVM acts as the buffer between the bytecode and the hardware.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
So long as you have the right version of Java installed on the target machine.  
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
In the browser realm, I see the main difference being that Java was installed to the OS, and was a plugin for the browser; as opposed to Web Assembly as being a part of the browser and installed with it.
Then there is the licensing and such not
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
Think of WebAssembly as a universal machine language and our modern browsers as the compatible CPUs that will run that universal machine language.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Cricket produces mild irritations (8)
|
|
|
|
|
BUGBEARS?
Cricket BUG
produces BEARS
mild irritations
I'm not sure about it though.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
FleaBites?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chirping
I can't justify the answer other than it's a mildly irritating sound that crickets produce.
|
|
|
|
|
Cheaters
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Win 10 has done something odd, I use two monitors on my Work desktop it booted on Monday and was treating monitor 2 as 1 and 1 as 2. So open Device Mangler and set them back the correct the order and set them. However the icons at the right are still on screen two. The boot this am the right screen was still favoured. Windows for things open on the right still. Any ideas... 
|
|
|
|
|
Did you do the "make this my main display" option thingy?
|
|
|
|
|
Success, Why did I not remember that!
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't help that you have to scroll down a bit to see it/remember it exists!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
