|
I special case code with you in mind.
And not in a good way.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I have awakened the witch in you, lets hope it's the white witch 
|
|
|
|
|
Don't wait to find out - grab the ruby slippers and get clicking those heels together!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Things were nice and quiet here too when we went for a walk in the morning, except for a lonely canoe passing under the bridge:
Shared album - Google Photos[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Love the picture but [pedant] it's actually a double skull, not a canoe.[/pedant]. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know we don't talk about Fight Club!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on my Voodoo Fu 
|
|
|
|
|
|
You wouldn't expect it from an old fart like me, but I'm a fan of the Prodigy!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I would!
Voodoo People is from '94, so let's say you were 16 back then.
That would mean you're now 41!
That wasn't their first album though and you may have been in your late teens or even early 20's back then.
The Prodigy guys are all around 50 themselves!
Face it, you're so old that even the "hip" stuff you're into is getting old 
Speaking of old, these guys[^] are now nearing 70 and still active!
Your little "witch problem" reminded me of this song
|
|
|
|
|
Pleased to meet you, can you guess my age
|
|
|
|
|
If that's a hint and you were born in the year when this came out[^] (1968) you should be 51 (unless your birthday is in December, in which case you're still "only" 50) 
|
|
|
|
|
Now I have got a one way ticket to the blues
|
|
|
|
|
No, I am sitting here pondering this:
Every year at this time, I purchase Stollen. On the package, in the nutrition section they say:
"Portion size 1/9 of package. Servings per package about 9. "
So: Did they calculate that using raw JavaScript or did they use a framework?
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
theoldfool wrote: Did they calculate that using raw JavaScript or did they use a framework?
Sometimes I wish my computer was less perspicuous though
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I just spent hours working on figuring out what variables are available in what scope in the CodeDOM.
Way too long. I finally got it working, or so it appears. The trouble is, I have no idea why it works, or how it is doing it.
And i just wrote this. And the debugger is giving me a headache.
Do I pack it in, and leave this magical code as is?
Or do i rewrite until I understand what I did? 
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Go somewhere take a break then come back later!
They call me different but the truth is they're all the same!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I did 
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Or do i rewrite until I understand what I did?
I hope you use something like Git, before you rewrite it into something that doesn't work.
honey the codewitch wrote: Do I pack it in, and leave this magical code as is?
If you have time, leave it for a day and divide and conquer after that.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
sounds like a good idea. Man, this lil monster is hard but cool.
It leads me to wonder all kinds of weird arcana about the order of type resolution when you reference something from inside a method without qualifying it with this or base
This needs to at least mostly emulate a subset of C#, which means really understanding how C# works. It's challenging.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: sounds like a good idea.
Ofcourse Git is a good idea 
honey the codewitch wrote: This needs to at least mostly emulate a subset of C#, which means really understanding how C# works.
I understand how C# evolved from VB, with P-code, a pre-installed set of libraries and a garbage collector. I understand the basics of the garbage collector and how pointers work.
I don't think I can comprehend your little monsters though, but the enthousiasm is fun to read 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
