|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Keyword "believe"; wikileaks is pointing to the NSA, with even Microsoft[^] being furious about that fact
Huh?
As phrased it suggests that you are proposing that the NSA was the one doing the attacking.
The MS article is pointing out that the vulnerability used in the attack came from the NSA, not that the NSA did it.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: The MS article is pointing out that the vulnerability used in the attack came from the NSA, not that the NSA did it.
Built by the NSA.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
i want to believe...
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Soap Box please 
Bruno
|
|
|
|
|
Why? I don't my young sister seeing this. 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, sorry. I was not Aware that political discussions are welcome in the Lounge.
I will leran from day to day 
|
|
|
|
|
What is "political" about the WannaCry attack?
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
"Born in the NSA" sung to the tune "Born in the USA"...
|
|
|
|
|
Just found one by chance and wondered if and why those were discontinued?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Probably to stop people trying to solve them by posting them in QA.
|
|
|
|
|
lol - they were really doing that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All challenges have been solved. There is nothing new under the sun to learn. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
modified 27-Oct-17 15:13pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Could you imagine what the world would be like, if everyone on earth did not repeat the same mistake twice? I can't.
|
|
|
|
|
Experience: Recognizing a mistake the second time you make it.
Arguing with a woman is like reading the Software License Agreement. In the end, you ignore everything and click "I agree".
Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
Might still be a good experience, compelling enough to give it a third go 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Only twice ?
«While I complain of being able to see only a shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is now, since I'm not at a stage of development where I'm capable of seeing it. A few hundred years later another traveler despairing as myself, may mourn the disappearance of what I may have seen, but failed to see.» Claude Levi-Strauss (Tristes Tropiques, 1955)
|
|
|
|
|
No. But then again, I get caught trying to imagine a world without hypotheticals!
|
|
|
|
|
Daily challenge: Fix more bugs than I create. 
The coding challenges will resume on Monday! Enjoy your weekend! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
modified 27-Oct-17 17:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
All these years and revisions later, does nHibernate still offer more?
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Schwallie wrote: All these years and revisions later, does nHibernate still offer more?
I wouldn't know, I don't use either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess recently I miss SessionLess or whatever it was called in nHibernate.
I know there's ways to set that up in EF, just a few extra steps.
I miss being able to choose the concurrency strategy, ie use this DateTime field, increment this integer field, use sql server TimeStamp, and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't do much .net development any more these days, but back when I did, I always preferred NH because I had to support legacy databases. I could map a boolean in my model to a char(1) in the database without having to muck up the model code with mapping information. At the time, EF (5? I think it was?) didn't have that capability yet. Don't know if it has it yet or not.
|
|
|
|
|
I have never used nH. However, the latest version EF is just fine, and I have not needed to go elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
