|
Re-read my first message. It's now performing well within acceptable range (to me) using RAID-10. I'm not going to re-try RAID-5.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm the person who suggested going to RAID-10 for both safety and speed. The fact that RAID-5 was so slow tells me that there is no hardware support on that enclosure for the RAID-5 calculations and it was being done entirely in software.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing it was a poor RAID-5 implementation.
Do note also that I've installed zero software for this, so the parity computation still has to be done by something in the enclosure, and not the CPU of the system it's connected to...
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: If I've reached the wrong conclusion, then I'm wrong. I just see nothing else to blame right now.
While RAID 10 sounds like the way to go, gotta at least give some love to RAID 5. Due to using the parity data on RAID 5 (which is what makes those writes slow) you can still rebuild while claiming more space when compared to RAID 5. Reads are still ok on 5, it's just the write speeds that suck. More times than not, you'll never need 5 for home use, but on those instances where space is more important than speed (for backups rarely accessed, etc.) it's nice to know it's there.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 4/6
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
⬛🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Never heard of the word... hit n try with last letter.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 3/6
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 4/6
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Had to look it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 3/6*
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 6/6
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Never heard of the word... hit n try with last letter.
Same!
|
|
|
|
|
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟨🟨⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 5/6*
🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 4/6*
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨🟩⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 3/6
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
🟨⬛🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
If it would've been an easier word, I would've gotten 6/6. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 4/6
🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
New word learnt today.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,042 5/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨🟩
⬛⬛🟨🟩🟩
🟨⬛⬛🟩🟩
🟨🟩🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
What does it even mean - stoopid word!
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm crylaughing at myself. I forgot how to enforce operator precedence in parsing code.
I've written it countless times. I have no idea how I forgot. It should be practically muscle memory at this point.
Next I will forget my birthday. 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Next I will forget my birthday.
Just don't forget your SO's birthday... 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Any operator who slips you a twenty gets precedence.
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure you already got it back. Anyway my 30 years old notes, based on a Modula2 publication from Niklaus Wirth 
Expression
\
SimpleExpression {Relation SimpleExpression}
\ \
\ "=="¦"!="¦"<"¦"<="¦">"¦">="
\
["+"¦"-"] Term {AddOperator Term}
\ \
\ "+"¦"-"¦"||"
\
Factor {MulOperator Factor}
\ \
\ "*" ¦ "/" ¦ "&&"
\
Number
|
Variable
|\
| Designator
|
|
String
|\
| """ {Aplha¦Digit} """
|
|
FunctionCall
|\
| Designator [ParameterList]
|
|
"(" Expression ")"
|
Negation
\
"!"
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but I can write a grammar for it. I just forgot how to write the code. :P
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Not clear on what happened.
Did you forget to put operator precedence enforcement into the program, or did you forget how to implement operator precedence enforcement?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly, I came to this thread to read about bicycles  I recently acquired a Circus Bike and that will make you feel like you truly can't ride a bike! Now back to your regularly scheduled programming.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: how to enforce operator precedence in parsing code.
You forgot what parentheses are for?
|
|
|
|
|
No. This isn't about constructing an expression that overrides precedence, but rather properly evaluating an expression with proper precedence.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
