|
Quote: It gets interesting when you try to get TV over Ethernet We have a fiber optic feed from the street into our Verizon box, and a co-ax from that box to the router. We very successfully live-stream Amazon movies from the router via Wi-Fi and I believe Wi-Fi speeds are about a tenth of basic Cat 5? I don't understand why you cannot stream TV over Cat 5?
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Because frequencies of signals are limited to about 860MHz. On satellite signals (after transmission by the decoder), you can have channels lying on a range that goes from 1000 to 2150MHz, which are filtered out by Cat5 cables because they cannot cope with such a high frequency.
Link (sorry, in french, but diagrams are understandable[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Joan M wrote: I did not know that 5e was different from 5E
It is the very same. No difference.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no difference.
The term "Cat 5e" has been removed from ISO 11801 in 2003. With cables manufactured before that date the 'e' indicates 1 GHz capability while Cat 5 only ensures 100 MHz. Cables manufactured after 2003 must be according to the above ISO 1 GHz capable.
|
|
|
|
|
Tell him I have a bridge to sell, maybe he's interested
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: Tell him I have a bridge to sell, maybe he's interested
Is that because you upgraded to the bridgE version?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have him by my side now...
:evil grin:
|
|
|
|
|
We split the profit 70 - 30?
|
|
|
|
|
Fine if I'm not in charge of the transport issues...
|
|
|
|
|
My previous washing machine had a severe problem with sensors and the main computer. The tech told me it was due to my not using "sears brand" detergent.
|
|
|
|
|
brandE or brande? that is the really important question...
|
|
|
|
|
It's easy, just pay them monEy instead of money.
|
|
|
|
|
I see, or I sEe, or I seE, or I sEE...
I think I'm, blind now...
|
|
|
|
|
Will Chrome ever Rust?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming it won't pass Go. It won't collect £200.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I'm concerned, it can just GO away.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it'll just Go?
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you C the comment above yours?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
I've been up since 6:30.. and it's Friday!
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
chrome does go, albeit slowly
chrome does go, and so does your memory when chrome is running
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
What sites do you visit? I have a bunch open and don't have problems with Chrome very often.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on the box, my own PC is fine but at some client sites they have staff on older equipment some even 32 bit, and on a low memory older gen box chrome sucks, it kills the machine and itself. (ff and ie no problems on those same boxes for the same sites.)
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: ie no problems Really? In my experience IE is the worst in performance.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I'm sure your machine is fine, how many GB? SSD I bet, and I'm sure no problems going to complicated sites (that ie would probably croak on.)
I'm talking about simple sites, real work sites, i.e. govt info form filling, no fancy crap (beyond security)
And on older equipment, for people doing real work, these things are true:
ie and ff work, good response, also allows other programs (i.e. excel, word) to continue working on same PC while they are doing it.
chrome stops everything, yes everything.
Yes they would love to have shiny new high powered toys like yours, but the boss knows they can do their work with what they have so they're stuck with the old machines, he doesn't care about their leisure browsing (- not allowed anyway.) If ie lets them get their work done then that's all they need anyway, if chrome croaks: too bad, get back to work and use the tool that can do the job.
Once again: on older equipment, compared to every other browser: chrome is the worst sort of pig.
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|