|
Brady Kelly wrote: I'm a contractor that's been here a month and attracted attention by taking too much leave, and being late from transport problems
And when you are at work, spending all your time dicking about with your phone and personal documents?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not dicking about at work with the scanning, simply asking so that I might have a few responses when I get home and really get scanning.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a brand new camera I've hardly used. I just thought it would be an interesting experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, what I usually do is pin the paper to a cork board or similar (to keep it flat), set the white balance in the camera based of the paper I'm shooting (if you don't have a manual white balance setting just pick the closest preset) and take the shot. If I can be bothered I'll even put the camera on a Tripod so that I can line up the paper properly.
As for the pins in the corner of the page I just edit them out after.
If using a tripod you don't need to worry about having a bright light shining on your papers (which may cause shadows on some creases) since you can just allow the camera to use a slower shutter speed.
|
|
|
|
|
1. use a tripod; have the camera and paper at 90o (have the paper flat on the table for example).
2. If you want to use a glass, you look at your local framing shop for "museum" quality glass that have less reflection (there are different quality of those)
3. Use ambient lighting and/or a diffuser for your flash or point your flash at the ceiling for an indirect flash; this will reduce the amount of shadowing of the folds and crinkles.
4. Shoot raw and adjust the white balance in post-processing.
Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...
Nihil obstat
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...
This is also sound advice on scrotum care.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
Shed Petition[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisElston wrote: Maximilien wrote: Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...
This is also sound advice on scrotum care.
Ouch.
Bob Dole The internet is a great way to get on the net.
2.0.82.7292 SP6a
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a half decent phone camera, try this....
CamScanner[^]
Works well.
I are n00b.
|
|
|
|
|
SinghUlarity... wrote: Works well.
Uhm, it won't work on any non-Android phone.
|
|
|
|
|
You deserve it if you're using a non-android phone
I are n00b.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I've used iPhones and now a Windows Phone, and I rarely install apps. So even if I had an Android phone, I'd not install this. I only use the browser and email apps irrespective of the phone I use!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know much about IE on Windows phone but Safari on the iPhone is terrible, when I was on iOS I avoided it at any cost. Any particular reason for avoiding apps or you're just too lazy to be arsed into installing any?
I are n00b.
|
|
|
|
|
Part of it is being lazy, the other bit is I am not very tech-savvy when it comes to using gadgets (mostly due to lack of interest). Kinda ironic I guess given that I spend most of my time writing code, including on mobile devices.
That said, I did get a Nexus 7 for my son and helped him install several games. So I am familiar with Google's app store.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use a white-balance correction tool during post-processing to get the yellow color whitened up
|
|
|
|
|
What could I use for post procesing, that has nice white balance correction?
|
|
|
|
|
Gimp is pretty good. Just take Colors / Auto / White Balance and it nearly always does a very good job.
|
|
|
|
|
I set the camera on a tripod and use long exposure times. I've succeeded in 'scanning' even nearly unreadable papers using this method. This works even in a dark room, given the exposure times are long enough, and the sensor in your camera is powerful enough.
I use a DSLR though, but I presume that even a point-and-shoot camera should be able to produce good results.
PS: You'll need to do some post processing. But it will be simple enough, and you could get it done with something like Picasa or Paint .NET.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
You could iron the page if it is badly creased. Or get some of that non-reflective glass/plastic that picture framing shops are always trying to sell.
Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to use a scanner? I mean printers with scanners are so cheap these days that they are almost disposable.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
Could you just take it to a Kinkos or some such and ask for the document to be scanned. It'd probably be pretty cheap.
I think you'll get a more professional result out of something like that than doing all this work to use your camera.
|
|
|
|
|
I've never had much luck with that, Brady. Glare, color shifts, keystoning, or some other damned thing always interferes. The best I've managed so far happened yesterday, when I needed to get a signed document on company letterhead to a government agency in a hurry. The scanner isn't working, the document is in Word format, and the fax machine is too poor quality to serve. So I signed the printed document, photographed my signature with my phone, emailed the picture to myself, cropped, resized, rotated and color-corrected the image on my desktop, then pasted it into the Word document. It looked as good as the original, so I pdf'd it and emailed it off, and no one has questioned its validity.
I do plan to keep my signature file locked in my safe, on a thumb drive, and no images of it on my desktop.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Set the white balance on the camera. I'm shocked at how few people actually do this, or do it in editing.
|
|
|
|
|
Until today I couldn't figure where to set the white balance. It's greyed out in the normal settings, and you have to go into 'deep settings'.
|
|
|
|
|
It's typically a very manual feature on most new cameras. I've pulled off some great shots using it. My professional photographer friend showed me that he carried around a white sheet of paper in his pocket. When in strange or bad lighting, he would whip it out at arm's length to set the white balance, then get his picture.
I didn't mean it in a mean way, I'm just surprised at the amount of people that discuss the same issue on all sorts of forums, and rarely do people ever mention this feature.
|
|
|
|
|
My biggest problem is paralax. I can't seem to get the picture parallel to the document. It always looks skewed; now that is going to take a tripod, which will only happen after payday, or just lots of practice, and a trip to the local print shop for the currently needed scan. It's still interesting though and I will continue as a little hobby.
|
|
|
|