|
The humble favicon[^]
17 different sizes and over 2 dozen ways to specify a specific use case for a favicon.
For an icon. That will appear in the browser tab (and a couple of other places, sure).
I'm just glad we don't have this many front end Javascript frameworks.
Oh, right. I see...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Github is down here, so I cannot enjoy your linky!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Strange: "IsUp.me" says Github is up, but I can't get in either.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
16x16x16, the only size that matters.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh gawd: 3D browsers, with 3D JS frameworks ... the horror, the horror ... 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
16 pixels wide, 16 pixels high, 16 colors.
Not 3D, no animations. Just a static picture for quick identification (as intended, before the marketing-department started to "design" icons).
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Just display it with your 3D printer.
Next we'll need a 3D touch screen!
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
3D YouTube videos might be a touch slow frame rate ... 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with Web Development!
The problem is with those fancy developers, who think that UI/UX matters and get involved with icons/colors/images and other black-magic...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
UI "design principle" comes to mind. If something takes time, add an animation.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't say that. The web development world seems pretty messed up to me. Endless frameworks, all of them hobbled by the limitations of the browser environment and DOM. Most folks just using Bob or Jane's module manager to download a hundred modules that they know nothing about (and actually may not even know or care that they are downloading) and then letting us run that code on our systems.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I have to stick the  icon more frequently...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: favicon
That's where you problem begins - and where it could end. Why not just an icon - even a favorite other-image with an on-click event. Or any such diversion form being drowned in this metamorphosized bloat-ware.
Remember: You are the boss! Remember the awesome feeling of power when you determined that Bob should be naked! Recapture the moment!
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's not about the work involved.
It's about the fact that it's gone from a single file which had multiple image sizes in it to needing a stupid amount of files and inclusion methods.
Browser vendors making up standards as they go along, OS writers deciding they want to do things their own way.
1 single file is all that's ever needed. Just one.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My guess would be that it's some combination of vendors not wanting to rely on a Microsoft file format, and mobile browsers not wanting to download every possible image size over a slow / metered network just to display one of them.
Possibly with a hint of xkcd 927[^] as well. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Responding to the Insider's Snark:
Quote: Oh, I think you could come up with a few more items than that
There are exactly 3 things needed to capture everything wrong with web development:
0) HTML
1) Javascript
2) CSS
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like everyone has started to catch up to what I have been saying for years...
Microsoft's WebForms was the zenith of web development capability. True, it did have its issues but it was in the process of being refined and optimized when the entire community decided to change course and start with this MVC bulls**t.
Everyone said that this new way was the right way to build web applications! Considering that the web, even as it still is today, was never designed to host such complexity in the first place, there was and never will be a right way until the underlying topology and protocols change that are more suited to a standardized form of development.
To date, I believe Russia is the only nation developing a modern internet infrastructure, while everyone else is pissing their monies away on stupid conflicts...
Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer (retired)
blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com
|
|
|
|
|
WebAssembly (wasm) is what is right with web development. I have been developing wasm with Blazor (HTML and C#, no JS or JS libraries/frameworks). No browser incompatibilities (that I have found). Not even CSS is needed. Better performance, quicker time to market, better unit testing and step-through debugging. All around makes web app development so much better, at least for me. YMMV.
Lots of languages (except JS) support wasm. My preference is Blazor, but the important thing is wasm in place of HTML/JS/CSS.
|
|
|
|
|
Pixelate boat to hide the truth (10)
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I hate when you are forced to give Full Control to folder to someone because they are a Very Important Person, and then they go in and take ownership and then remove all other users from any sort of access (to include Administrators), and then they go away or die or something and NO ONE can get into the folder ever again.
And then you get a ticket asking you to restore access to the folder.
|
|
|
|
|
You're complaining, but he's DEAD!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
... or if he isn't yet, he will be very shortly.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
if he finds him 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
