|
...that MS is going to have a whole load of work on their hands soon.
All of it's documentation only works properly with Edge, it's useless with the Chrome renderer (probably to make you use Edge).
Open this in both: Image.FromFile Method (System.Drawing) | Microsoft Docs[^] and see the difference.
And the new version of Edge will be Chromium based ...  UBlock can get a bit ahead of itself ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 10-Nov-19 11:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
works perfectly fine (and identically) in both chrome and palemoon (firefox) on linux.
perhaps problem is only with w10? so shouldn't affect many serious developers.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Works great in SeaMonkey on Win7 32 
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CSS is failing to load in Chrome for some reason. What do the dev tools say about that?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
"ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT" - turns out it's uBlock disabling CSS for no obvious reason (which explains why it's the same on all my Win10 devices).
Added to whitelist ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Uhhh... dude, it works fine on Win10, in Chrome 77, Edge, and IE 11. Identical in all browsers.
|
|
|
|
|
DevTools say: "ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT" - turns out it's uBlock disabling CSS for no obvious reason (which explains why it's the same on all my Win10 devices).
Added to whitelist ...
Interesting - it's been like that for ages, so I just assumed that it was MS trying to push me to Edge a little more "aggressively" than usual. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks the same to me, although Edge shows me C++ code instead of C#.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: DevTools say: "ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT" - turns out it's uBlock disabling CSS for no obvious reason
Ahhh, my guess: it's a touch screen issue,
[the cat] 'ass dialed' that setting??
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Step 16 of about 60. Taking apart a device with that kind of instructions really is a pleasure. 
At least the PDF has lots of pictures. For idiots they obviously intended it to work as a comic book.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
At least you have a pdf, our last coffee machine at work didn't even have a user manual!
You can guess where that machine went 
|
|
|
|
|
On the counter in the lunch room?
I, for one, like Roman Numerals.
|
|
|
|
|
No, as nobody could understand how to clean the thing, it went back to the supplier.
Bad coffeemachine !
|
|
|
|
|
Just checked what that 'Live Share' button on my newly installed VS2019 is about, and me think it is a great opportunity for OG to remove that ugly comment about 'we can't see...' and go into a live collaboration session with QA questioners...
A new area I would say...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Does it come with a free supply of eye bleach? 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: To boldly share what no one has shared before
|
|
|
|
|
May it be as successful as the CodeProject "Google Helpouts" experiment from 2014. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This may not be necessary as the Chinese are already cloning OriginalGriff.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
SmarterASP and MyWindowsHosting; both one and the same, are catastrophically down- for several hours apparently.
When I found out, I simply re-pointed my domains to my development area in Azure. Time down less than 5 minutes. I am not super concerned about it as I am up and running. Nothing like having a copy of my content and data locally.
Apparently this is not the case for others, as evidenced by social media pages; who do not have their DBs or content backed up. A steady stream of whining about how they are going to look bad because of the poor choices they made- mainly having no disaster and recovery plan that could be easily implemented. The thousands of dollars they are losing. The threats of class action lawsuits.
There is no official word on the cause and estimated time of system restoration. There is conjecture that they are infected with some crypto-locker, or a DDOS. I could give a crap, as while there will me a marginal increase in my cost, I am still running strong
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently they have a 99.9% uptime guarantee.
Sounds good eh?
Until you take out the calculator at least.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and for each hour they are down they will credit your account for a free month.
Unless it is something beyond their control, such as DOS or other malicious attacks
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
MadMyche wrote: Yes, and for each hour they are down they will credit your account for a free month
That's all good for saving a few dollars, but if your site is down then it's down.
same as some airlines if a flight is cancelled they give you a free flight later etc, but you've still missed your appointment haven't you? you've missed a deal, a funeral, a wedding.
your site is down you've potentially missed a huge sale, you've lost or put out customers that depend on you, you've not been able to keep your promise to your users. you may get a "whole free month" from microsoft (or amazon, google...) but does that mean because of your 100, 1000, 10000 clients missing out you then give them a free month?
failure is failure, for some the token recompense is OK, but for some it's really not good enough. they need to have their fail-over servers, connections, sites etc.
1 month free from [pick-your-multi-billion-dollar-provider], woohoo NOT!
They've suckered you into a for them [let's face it] zero cost "response" to their failure
...AND passed the true FULL cost and FULL responsibility for THEIR failure ON YOU.
Yeah I know everywhere is the same, just saying the "1 month for 1 hour" is in reality no better than those that give you nothing.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
