|
"Solution"
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Try:
I was avoiding **a***a*o - because it's the *o*u*io*!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, lol
And now I gave it away too
It's still early
|
|
|
|
|
Pick one from n shark movies.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's what she said, ba dum tsss!
|
|
|
|
|
He's here all week, folks!
Try the veal!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
One Night in Paris
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
"Sharks on the train (Italian rail version)"
(It's what the ticket inspector says when he throws them all out)
|
|
|
|
|
Sharkestration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I absolutely despise when people say "oh, I'm using this because it reduces the amount of code I have to type".
F**** me. If you don't like typing, why are you a programmer?
I need a punching bag in my home-office.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
But isn't that essentially the only reason "we" use anything?
I mean yes, I could write a Deflater from scratch, but I'll use zlib to reduce the amount of code I have to type..
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: I mean yes, I could write a Deflater from scratch, but I'll use zlib to reduce the amount of code I have to type..
Well no actually, it's because someone's written it, tested it, and it's a sh*t load of code to write. But when it's something (think of a C macro, for example) that just obfuscates the code, that's what I mean. See my rant below this one.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Same thing I see with Linq/Lambdas ; it's still just the Cult of Fewer Keystrokes .
|
|
|
|
|
Also var everywhere
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, yes, but I include that as part of Linq -- given that it was only added to support Linq's/Lambda's anonymous types.
|
|
|
|
|
I use (our team uses) var, where applicable. Nothing wrong with it, unless you are using notepad to edit your code.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you one of Those People who use var instead of int? If so, why the hell?
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: Are you one of Those People who use var instead of int?
no. I did say "where applicable".
We use var on list returns and some lamda/linq stuff, but not everywhere.
Edit: I have never run into an issue with "var". Visual Studio lets me know what the type is, if I need to know it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok good.
Slacker007 wrote: "where applicable" Well that's the thing. There's a school of thought that it is applicable any time it is allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: There's a school of thought that it is applicable any time it is allowed.
I use ReSharper a lot, and it will ask you everytime it can to use implicit type declaration. So, I can see why some devs out there may think that it is good for everything.
However, I have debugged code files that have had "var" all over the place, and it has not been an issue. If for some reason, I cannot tell the type, then hovering over "var" will tell you.
|
|
|
|
|
Try doing a code review in Crucible where someone's abused var and then see how you feel about that.
|
|
|
|