|
If you have a property, you will have to pay a tribute 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: sooo, everything about your car is an attribute. The fact it is a car is a property.
So the colour of the car is an attribute.
The wheel is a property in it self, but an attribute to the car?
|
|
|
|
|
What if I added some more properties and turned it into a boat and a helicopter all at once? Also it's important that it runs on raspberry juice (or whale oil) and has a robot as the pilot[^].
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say the house is a property, the windows are an attribute, actually the land is the equivalent of field which ties in quite nicely with .net.
|
|
|
|
|
Within .Net, my understanding is that a property will have a getter and/or a setter with possibly some logic in them. And an attribute would just be a public variable, for example, where there is no logic in the get and set.
But that is just from my experience, nothing official. Could be totally wrong.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
I know the difference in .Net, it's the lingual difference or semantics I'm after.
|
|
|
|
|
OP:Quote: No, I don't mean in .Net, I mean semantically.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Or is there an even better word?
A feature.
|
|
|
|
|
So a bug? 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So a bug?
No, no. A Bug is an "undocumented feature"; a "feature" is just something that might or might not work.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
If the undocumented feature is working, is it still a bug?
|
|
|
|
|
Most English speakers don't use those terms. We tend to say watchamacallit, or thingummybob, or just point at it. 
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say that the two words were essentially synonymous outside of IT.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
In the English language "property" and "attribute" are exactly the same meaning in the case where "property" is a property of an object such as "a banana is yellow". In this case, "yellow" is an attribute or property of the banana.
If you are buying a house then the house can be referred to as a "property" but this is a different meaning and has nothing to do with "attribute".
You can also "attribute" a quotation to a given person but this is a different meaning and has nothing to do with "property".
Additionally, you can say, "That is my property" when referring to an object that belongs to you. Again, nothing to do with "attribute".
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I was hoping one was more related to nouns and the other one to adjectives or adverbs
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the English language fun! 
"When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others; same thing when you are stupid."
Ignorant - An individual without knowledge, but is willing to learn.
Stupid - An individual without knowledge and is incapable of learning.
Idiot - An individual without knowledge and allows social media to do the thinking for them.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope! It's just that simple. Two words for the same thing; just like "motorcar" and "automobile". The English language has a lot of redundancy because we stole a lot of our words from several different languages so we end up with a lot of duplicate use cases.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Forogar wrote: You can also "attribute" a quotation to a given person but this is a different meaning and has nothing to do with "property".
I think you're off the mark on this particular example. When you attribute a quote, you are saying it is the property of some source. "Nothing to do with" is, at least as I observe, a substantial overstatement.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that they're pretty much synonymous in everyday usage.
But...
What are the properties of _A_ car?
What are the attributes of _THIS_ car?
|
|
|
|
|
So properties of a class and attributes of an instance sort of.
|
|
|
|
|
a property is an "intrinsic" quality of a subject and an attribute is a quality of the subject perceived by an observer? they can be identical, but there are also chances that they differ ...
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking they were both characteristics as I read through all the responses... So I had to google both and read the various definitions... Some even went on to compare to a virtue, so sorry that I do not have.
Anyways this about sums up that they are one in the same, only real difference is the contexts they get used in, their lineage, and popularity.GoogleQuote: an attribute, quality, or characteristic of something. define: property - Google Search
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
+1 for learning a new way to google-
|
|
|
|
|
A property is a proper, inherent quality of an object. Like the lyrics and music of a song - if you change those, it is a different song.
An attribute is a quality attributed to an object, like the name of song or what you call it. The song called by a different name would sound just as sweet.
The property is the piece of land, no matter who is attributed as the owner of that land.
There is certainy a diffuse grey zone: If you have a look at the property, you may see its size by yourself. You may report that it is a thousand by two thosand feet. I might report that it is three hundred by six hundred meters. The proper size of the land doesn't change, but you and put different labels, different attributions, on the land to indcate its its size. Its real size is a property, but a measurement of that size, in some unit, may be termed an attribute.
I am not quite sure about that - the owner certainly has little to do with the lot itself, and is clearly an attribute. A measurement, whether in feet or meters, does represent a proper quality quite directly. But there is a limit to the processing before it becomes a non-proper quality: The lyrics is a proper quality of the song, a two summary in two sentences can be attributed to the song, but is not a proper quality of the song. You have to draw the line somewhere, even if you do it with a gray color, wide and untidy bush.
In any case, .net really got it the wrong way: The "real" quality inside the object is referred to as something attributed to the object, while a processing of the "real" object quality, presenting a quality that is not "real", is called a property, a proper value. It should have been the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
