|
LOL! OMG: IIRC u r my age(ish) - it's totes dope - n we hd slang idioms as wL. ALA, SWALK, NORWICH ... we knew them all.
I'm a tries-not-to-be-GOM but I don't always succeed. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then this must be your cat: [Grumpy] 
|
|
|
|
|
Not a cat person myself. But my son would probably choose a pet like that.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a grumpy remark, suits you 
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing grumpy about not being a cat lover. Now if that was a meerkat ...
|
|
|
|
|
I love getting my father to watch things like this. He was born in the 30s and entered the police force after a stint in the RAF (late 1950s). It's good to get him ranting about the historical inaccuracies in it (ranks that didn't exist at the time, etc). Makes it much more entertaining.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's another way to enjoy it I suppose. To find holes in the story line.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah just getting his dad wound up, get the blood flowing and excercises the mind, the vocal cords, the arm (waving fist) and the lungs as he cracks up laughing.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Spooks is still one of my favorites. I'm also into Humans right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Me and Mrs. Wife were watching on Netflix Amazon Prime when it suddenly changed from Free to US$7.99/episode - even those we already saw. We found "other means" to finish watching the series.
(Edit: correction of blame, above).
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
modified 30-Aug-17 12:06pm.
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: Me and Mrs. Wife were watching on Netflix when it suddenly changed from Free to US$7.99/episode
Huh? Netflix USA? I did not know that they have that sort of pricing model.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - I jumped the gun (i.e., I made an error). It was Amazon Prime with the greedy palms, not Netflix. Netflix caused me some other problems (shows taken from Hulu+).
You are 100% correct.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that makes sense. Netflix is removing it on September 1. So I had to hurry and finish out the series this month 
|
|
|
|
|
A part of the Foyle's War I found interesting were the back-themes. They didn't hide the normally unspoken events (anti-Italian riots, rampant antisemitism, defeatism, black-marketing). The part of the home front they'd rather be forgotten.
It adds to the main thread's context; sometimes even setting up context for episodes yet to come.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the secondary story lines were interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Just read about it on the German c't magazine web page (Hardware-Fuzzing: Hintertüren und Fehler in CPUs aufspüren | heise Security[^]):
The sandsifter audits x86 processors for hidden instructions and hardware bugs, by systematically generating machine code to search through a processor's instruction set, and monitoring execution for anomalies. Sandsifter has uncovered secret processor instructions from every major vendor; ubiquitous software bugs in disassemblers, assemblers, and emulators; flaws in enterprise hypervisors; and both benign and security-critical hardware bugs in x86 chips.
Also interesting how he reduces the possible number of instructions from 1.3x1036 to about 100,000,000 by storing them across page boundaries for execution where the second page is marked as not executable. He then shifts the max. 15 byte long instruction left until no fault is generated.
|
|
|
|
|
ADD
MUL
SUB
PUSH
POP
.
.
.
Then a million hidden instructions ?
Quote: Typically, several million undocumented instructions on your processor will be found
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy Falcon.
|
|
|
|
|
Including the possible literal or register operands with different widths and displacements.
|
|
|
|
|
xoreaxeaxeax wrote: Lastly, a so-called ‘halt and catch fire’ instruction was discovered on an as-yet unnamed x86 processor. This instruction, executed in ring 3 from an unprivileged process, appears to lock the processor entirely
That could be bad..
|
|
|
|
|
In deed. According to the choosen name it is even possible that the CPU is damaged.
|
|
|
|
|
In computer engineering, Halt and Catch Fire, known by the assembly mnemonic HCF, is an idiom referring to a computer machine code instruction that causes the computer's central processing unit (CPU) to cease meaningful operation, typically requiring a restart of the computer. It originally referred to a fictitious instruction in IBM System/360 computers, but later computer developers who saw the joke created real versions of this instruction for some machines. In the case of real instructions the implication of this expression is that, whereas in most cases in which a CPU executes an unintended instruction (a bug in the code) the computer may still be able to recover, but in the case of an HCF instruction there is, by definition, no way for the system to recover without a restart.
The expression "catch fire" in this context is normally facetious, rather than literal, referring to a total loss of CPU functionality during the current session. The imaginative idea is that the CPU chip would be switching some circuits so fast that it would cause them to overheat and burn.
Although in the jargon file[^] ESR claims there was a chip that could overload and burn its bus if given a specific bit of invalid input.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. There were some versions of the 8085 microprocessor that had an HCF instruction. It would sit there and increment the value on the address lines until reset or powered off.
I also remember the PDP-11 had one, something like this: mov -@(pc),-@(pc) (syntax probably isn't right). It moved the contents located at the program counter (the current instruction) to the preceding word, and then jumped there. The end result was a similar effect to the HCF on the 8085, except the address lines would decrement and the machine was actually running. Of course since the PDP-11 had memory-mapped I/O, things would get interesting pretty quickly...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
