|
Scary, but sure beats being board.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
That statement will never fly, and what's left will never get off the ground.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
sowwy, but hewe in Asia two Wongs can make a wight.
an 2 wights makes a u-turn
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Orville the "Thought of the day" crash and burn?
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
that wilbur the edges somewhat
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
If planes are bad for the planet, when will we leave the fusel age?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Ahem![^] 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Why the thieving little devil!
I typed that into my TOTD file ages ago.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't that make todays TOTD more true?
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, the internet said so.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly, but no matter how many Wrights you gather, we will always make something. 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and THREE rights make a left.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and you going to love it. I guarantee that!
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and two planes make an air show.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Statement attributed to Australia's Minister for Immigration in the 1920s when questioned about Australia's policy that restricted immigration to whites only: "Because two Wongs don't make a white".
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, three Points make a plane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice!
I now feel the urge to go listen to a certain Rush album.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently working on my first Prism 6 MVVM project and ran into a sticky situation yesterday: To navigate between views, I use a tab control across the main window. As the user clicks on the tabs, different UserControl views are loaded. All went well, until I started clicking on certain controls in a particular view. At times the framework decided I was on the wrong view and would click a different tab for me, causing an unwanted change in the current view.
It drove me nuts for hours. Nothing I did seemed to make any difference. 
After several hours I decided to try every available parameter option in the tab binding statement. Eventually I stumbled on a parameter that is new since .NET 4.5: The "Delay=xxx" parameter that causes a delay of xxx mS in the binding action. It worked! Even setting the delay to 1 mS works, but not if you set it to zero.
The frustrating part is that I don't understand why it works. However, I not complaining too much as long as it works. But as Thomas Carlyle said: "There is nothing more terrible than activity without insight." 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I may be wrong, but a delay property to correct timing errors sounds like a very sinister hack. If it's intended for another purpose and you just jused it to such an end, then you are the sinister hacker.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
modified 16-Feb-17 10:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: then you are the sinister hacker
Should I wear a white hat or a black one - I wonder!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
What, you've never resorted to using a NOP loop to fine tune your firmware?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. More like bit banging RS232, but that required carefully calculating the number of bus cycles spent in the loop. The calculations actually were very easy on the CDP1802. Most instructions needed only two bus cycles, some branches and NOP needed three. I would have used NOP only if I needed an odd number of bus cycles. Back then we used to run our terminals at conservative 300 baud, but recently we have rewritten that code to go to 1200 baud without changing the traditional clock frequency of 1.76 MHz and if you can run your computer at 5 MHz or even 6.4 MHz, 9600 baud or even more should be possible.
I have decided to leave my old computer at 1.76 MHz, but I have a CDP1802 BCE here, which runs at 5 MHz at 5V. Fast enough memory is no question anymore and if I forget about the old graphics chip (it limited the clock to 1.76 MHz) I can easily build a new one. I want to start with the processor board, which will have no I/O of its own, so bit banged RS232 will be really helpful to get this tpo work.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like fun! I just got that $5 computer from Onion - Omega 2+ - and I'm trying to come up with a project for it. 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
