|
Better: Conducted by (some person)
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
I think fuehrt durch key is what will get executed
Risikostufe is some parameter that will get passed
Wird informiert is probably a flag for the callback
That is what I would speculate
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Close, but no banana.
'Führt' suggests a 'who', not a 'what'?
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you say execute stored procedure? With ausfuehren?
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but usually not 'durchführen'.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
I would just say: exekutieren
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
let's see how you do with this one from a bumper sticker:
Hier fährt der Henker noch selbst.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Follow the link in this response in the previous thread above[^] - it is about colons in German 
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the chatter, these sound more like roles for people.
a. Who is doing the work or filling out the request?
b. Risk classification
c. Who is informed (or maybe consents/signs=off/approves)?
Risk acceptance form?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to all the responders, I think I got most of it figured out. It is actually the xml description of a series of UML diagrams (actually BPMN). And I have decided, after talking with the client, that most of it is needed for this phase. The parser will just throw it away for now, and I will put in some hooks to process these if/when needed.
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, navigate a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects! - Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Can't map two classes with same name from different namespace · Issue #362 · aspnet/EntityFramework6 · GitHub[^]
This has been a reported EF bug since AT LEAST 2012, and not only is it not fixed (as of EF6.2), but MS has no intention of fixing it. Their response is to use EF7 - in the not-ready-for-prime-time Core framework.
MS says - "This is a limitation of EF that we plan to fix but it is complicated and not something we are planning to address in EF6."
Well, surprise motherf*ckers - PROGRAMMING IS HARD SOMETIMES. Just ask the victims of your apathetic approach to product maintenance!
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Way back when V1.0 of .NET was released, it was discovered - and reported - that you can't create a C# abstract UserControl and then bring up derived (concrete) versions in the designer unless you created an interim concrete class to derive from:
public class MyAbstractBase : UserControl
{
...
}
public class MyConcreteControl : MyAbstractBase
{
...
}This gives a designer crash.
public class MyAbstractBase : UserControl
{
...
}
public class MyConcreteIntermediate : MyAbstractBase{}
public class MyConcreteControl : MyConcreteIntermediate
{
...
}Works fine, but pretty much cr@ps over the whole point of abstract classes and almost forces you to have two code bases: release which omits the intermediate, and dev which doesn't.
Which is frankly stupid.
It was reported. And has been with every version of Visual Studio since.
Is it fixed? No chance, there is no money in it.
All I'm saying is: don't hold your breath waiting for a fix ... if there isn't pretty immediate money in it, it probably won't happen.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: All I'm saying is: don't hold your breath waiting for a fix ...
Oh I already know that, because MS stated as much. That's my complaint - they don't support their crapware.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers!
It's a problem I've never run into, but it's bound to happen some day, and now I can debug it without having to spend three seconds wondering what the problem is.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Even if the vendor promises a fix by a certain date, plan to implement without the promised fix!
Been there/done that during the old wave of 16 bit to 32 bit software migrations.
The promised 32 bit library version NEVER arrived, or maybe it arrived 2 years after promised?
Even if it had arrived, it probably would not have been thread safe.
Fortunately, I had not counted on them and implemented an in-memory, client-server architecture to span the divide.
Circa NT 4.0
|
|
|
|
|
Boy am I glad that a wise colleague at work has chosen NHibernate instead of EF
|
|
|
|
|
the core process for EF does not handle schemas(namespaces) at all. and yes, this is a serious downside to EF.
for those who may misunderstand me:
This is not possible with EF in the same EF model:
schema1.Employer
schema2.Employer
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, even if the models are in different assemblies with completely different namespaces, it still breaks. How could they possibly think that was even close to being acceptable.
Once the code is generated, why does entity framework even freakin care?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
#realJSOP wrote: Once the code is generated, why does entity framework even freakin care?
because it works with the DB of choice behind the scenes. and for some stupid reason, it can't tell what schema you are using in your DB action thus the error.
It boils down to lousy design. plain and simple.
|
|
|
|
|
I came across this earlier this year John , as you say it sucks
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
So, the folks in the City want to build a bunch of houses in a small park in our neighbourhood, practically my doorstep. We have started some FB action (I'm not there) but we also would like to build a website. I guess I am the driver of that.
We want to have a basic website with graphics and stuff, but also links to petitions, and also preferably we would like to upload City documents that are several hundred MBs.
It really should be an online tool - expecting ppl to download&install is a stretch - so that several ppl can share the work.
[Important:] any noob should be able to add a picture or some text
[nicetohave:] but geeks like my should be able to add backlinks like:
113 people have signed the petition
Sign here!
(where 113 comes from an external site)
So I would guess that such an online tool would have to be integrated with the hosting solution?
All advice welcome. Thanks a lot!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Tarbaby. Don't kick it.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you want to be stuck maintaining an actual web site, WordPress is probably the answer. Evidently, and idiot can design/maintain a Wordpress web site.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Wordpress, Squarespace, etc...
For more, I like to look for alternatives by googling "[product] vs" and see what the autocomplete does. 
Latest Article - Azure Function - Compute Pi Stress Test
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
