|
The famous oil well fire fighter once said: "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur."
|
|
|
|
|
Is your CV up to date?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think i need to update my CV ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Run! Run as fast as you can & don't look back - it'll only slow you down!
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Or even worst... I could become a pillar of salt 
|
|
|
|
|
Luigi Esposito wrote: Or even worst... I could become a pillar of salt VB
FTFY!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Or even worst... I could become a pillar of salt VBA
Access was mentioned!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
VBA is not the worst thing in the world. Oh wait, maybe it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Tied with PHP.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Pile of VB, surley
|
|
|
|
|
Luigi Esposito wrote: low code development i mean the one using BPM (Business process management) platforms
In twenty years of coding, I have never heard of such an animal. I know what low level code, like C or C++, or assembly, is, and I have a rough idea what BPM is, but my BPM is light years away from anything close to low level.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: In twenty years of coding, I have never heard of such an animal.
Back in 2005, I worked for a company who's main IDE (if you can call it such a thing) was Omnis Studio (it's still around, weirdly enough http://www.tigerlogic.com/tigerlogic/omnis/products/studio/[^])
It was sold as a "4th generation language" (referring to the Omnis language) and was so advanced that you weren't allowed to type your own code, but had to select the appropriate keywords from a context sensitive list.
I was glad to see the back of that 
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yikes. I thought those kind of things died by 2000. Around '95 I was introduced to a very evil Frankenstein that generated VB-like code (maybe crossed with COBOL) based on a flowchart you created with a GUI. Luckily I wasn't a coder then and this was just a novelty for my boss.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Not bloody Things by any chance? I remember the ThingsDB data layer and it truly was a steaming bucket of excrement!
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
I dunno what the name was, but Things does ring a microscopic bell somewhere. I don't remember seeing a data layer as such, but maybe back then I didn't know to look at or for one.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
I can't remember the actul product but it was all Things This and Things That. What I do recall was that the company behind it was French; which goes to explain why it never actually worked.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
I think that such things belong to the past. I worked with such tools known as CASE, RAD or 4GL (i was even a PowerBuilder developer  )
The new paradigma of BPM is focusing on process design and coding it with any script language (if needed)
|
|
|
|
|
Luigi Esposito wrote: I think that such things belong to the past.
They belonged to the past even back in 2005
Luigi Esposito wrote: The new paradigma of [insert technology/methodology of your choice here] is..
If I had a quid for every time I'd heard a sentence starting like this.. 
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a fun of these platforms but some of them really seems to be very promising. Try to get a look at the Forrester research about low code development, it's a report very interesting 
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes they can have uses, but in the main it's a way of trying to create a product while avoiding coding.. 
There are many RAD-type platforms (call them what you will) and while you'll often get a reasonable product out for minimal effort, it usually doesn't take long before you come up against the limitations of the platform - be it capabilities, licensing, support or vendor issues, e.g. going out of business or dropping support for the platform you use
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Pega is one of the platforms..
|
|
|
|
|
This lot may not be a good source of opinions on enterprise type software. From my VERY limited experience with these things the "development" is mostly configuring their framework. The only validity for the expression low code would be low value code. A framework is an abstraction layer and I would consider these to be very abstracted.
You probably need to find a forum of configurers rather than developers.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I think that is not only matter of configuring their framework. Most of the activities will be spent on process design, including coding C# scripts and where complexity depends from the process you are defining.
|
|
|
|
|
Luigi Esposito wrote: including coding C# scripts
I rest my case, any time you describe coding as writing scripts you are not looking at development requirements but configuration.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
