|
Still playing with it but kinda like everything so far. Feels like what 2012 should have been (or maybe I'm used to it already). BTW: don't you find it odd that they are actually naming the versions to the actual year that it comes out? That just never happens with Microsloth... 
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: actually naming the versions to the actual year that it comes out?
Haven't they always done that ?
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
I seem to recall that at least one version came out a year or so after the designation. I am happy to be corrected. Whatever the case always found it be a solid piece of kit.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
I think some have been released slightly in advance - so they are current for as much of the year as possible. I think it strange that 2013 is being released so late in the year - would have been better marketing surely to call it 2014?
I confess to liking VS but it certainly has enough issues to make me swear at it quite regularly - I'm hoping some of those go away in 2013.
The main issues I have are with responsiveness - when I flick between various source files looking at issues, I don't want to have to sit and twiddle my thumbs for even 1 second (let alone the 15 or 20 I have to on occasion) waiting for VS to parse some Xaml in a source file I mistakenly tabbed to!
The other issue is the (been there since day one I think) caching? issue - i.e. VS fails to build something, displaying various errors, then closing/opening VS you can build again fine. This has lost me serious hours in the past as I try to figure out what appears to be some strange bug in my software but turns out to be some strange bug in VS !
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: I think some have been released slightly in advance
Nope; you are correct and I am not. Must be thinking of some other product. 
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: you are correct and I am not.
Same as it ever was 
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
To be perfectly accurate, it seems VS2008 was released in November 2007
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: I think some have been released slightly in advance
It's been a long time since I had a monthly subscription for a magazine, but I remember they liked to send out their december issue around the 10th of november or even earlier.
Also I'm used to christmas cookies being offered for sale in the supermarkets from late august onwards.
Are you thinking along those lines?
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Oh - & it puts a small '3 references' tag thingo above each method in the source code which is handy; apparently if you're using TFS it also shows comments about who last updated that bit of code!
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Git integration.
Notifications window.
Browser Link[^]
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.
- Mitchell Kapor
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: Menus still in upper case, BTW, for those who wonder!
And the same tweak[^] still works to get them back to normal.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a programmer with over 30 years of experience in the industry, and have experience in most of the currently relevant Microsoft technologies. I've been the victim of right-sizing, cost-cutting, contractual obligations regarding returning veterans, and most recently, out-sourcing, so I'm looking for a new "opportunity". Before you get yourselves into a lather and unleash your legions of "senior recruiters" with their itchy send-email fingers in my direction, know this.
I can understand that you probably use some sort fuzzy-logic word matching application to process the thousands upon thousands of IT-related resumes on the various job-search web sites. I get it - I really do. It's a brilliant method for weeding out the non-IT candidates from those lucky millions of others that you would like to represent. However, you STILL have a problem - several, in fact.
First, your "senior recruiters are merely emailing (or even worse, cold-calling) EVERYONE that might be a match for a given job posting. Take me for instance. ALL of my online job site profiles have that little box checked that says "WILL NOT RELOCATE". It seems that your "senior recruiters" conveniently ignore that fact, and I get notices for jobs all over the world. Here's some info that may keep your people out of my inbox - I DO NOT WANT TO WORK IN BUM-F*CK EGYPT, NORTH CAROLINA, OR ANY STATE THAT STARTS WITH THE WORD "NEW". In point of fact, if it ain't within 50 miles of my zip code, I don't want to know about it. Make your "senior recruiters" eyeball EVERY resume and Monster profile before sending an email or making a phone call.
Furthermore, even if I knew someone that might be interested in such a position, it's your job to find them - NOT my job to give you their name, so don't ask me to do it. If you're so lazy that you can't properly do a job that admittedly doesn't take a lot of cerebral fortitude, maybe you should find more meaningful work. I suggest looking into sweeping standing water off sidewalks, or maybe maintaining the machine that puts the little ridges on checkers.
Next, teach your "senior recruiters" a little something about US geography. For the record, Houston and Dallas are NOWHERE NEAR San Antonio. Neither location qualifies as a "longish commute" (and yes, I had some idiot call it that today).
Finally, given the fact that so many American programmers are loosing their jobs to off-shore "programmers", don't add insult to injury and have some third-world janitor call me on the phone in the middle of his lunch break and try to coerce something resembling the English language from his mouth. I will hang up on them EVERY time, not because he can't speak English (sadly, most US kids nowadays cant speak the language either, judging by what I've seen on the internet), but because he's not an American. If it wasn't so infuriating, I would find in amusingly ironic.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 11-Nov-13 18:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You fail at the first hurdle - recruiters can't read - which is why their fuzzy-matching (aka search for anything with any of the keywords in it at all) is necessary.
YOu can see this is the case if you add "I will not, under any circumstances, work in a position that requires VB6" to your online profile.
Within five minutes you will have a contact saying "I see you list VB6 as one of your skills"
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
That is brilliantly unambiguous, John, and certainly deserves an up-vote !
And now, just between us, please share how you really feel.
bill
"What Turing gave us for the first time (and without Turing you just couldn't do any of this) is he gave us a way of thinking about and taking seriously and thinking in a disciplined way about phenomena that have, as I like to say, trillions of moving parts.
Until the late 20th century, nobody knew how to take seriously a machine with a trillion moving parts. It's just mind-boggling." Daniel C. Dennett
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: "senior recruiters"
They're using recruiters from the old codgers senior home to find programmers.
You have to speak loud enough so they can hear you and you need to use at least a 24pt font in bold for them to read.
I know, that will make your 3 page resume at least 15 pages again, but they would have fallen asleep before reading the first page any way.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
You are wasting your time. I am looking for pastures new right now and it is frustrating but venting at recruiters is both a waste of time and may, believe it or not, stop you from getting a great role. Why? Because as inefficient as they are when it comes to eye-balling resumes (which, by the way, they do not actually do) it might just be that if you are responsive and show interest and keep in touch they may be more likely to properly read your resume and, subsequently, properly match it to a job that you could walk to. I used to get all crusty and in their face like you but times have changed and so, incredibly, have they. I now try and call each one and have a quick chat. Most of the time they don't have anything but now and again I talk to someone who says "well, I can see that won't fit but I do have something else...". Looking for a new role is a full time job and a chance to network. Try it: you might be surprised.
(on the other hand, you may get terribly disappointed and then you'll blame me and you have many, many guns and I don't and, oh sh*t, here he comes!!!)
ps If they say they have something in the valley, do let me know...
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
It works both ways. They make quite a bit of money for everyone they place, and they really can't afford to piss too many people off. Besides, it's the principal of the thing. Why should I contribute to a company who off-shored their recruiting jobs?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Why should I contribute to a company who off-shored their recruiting jobs?
Because you want to work and they may have a the job you want? This feels like you're cutting your nose to spite your face. Yes, they are parasites but they do provide a service (however poorly many of them do so). I have worked with one or two agents for well over 10 years (in the UK) and they are superb. I've only been back here a couple of years so still trying to figure out how they are different.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
John,
I'm afraid you will find that a lot of the "recruiters" today are not professionals in the field they are recruiting for (not all, but most). Most of them (especially the new ones) have shifted from selling homes (which went south a few years ago) to that most lucrative recruiting gig. I truly believe that they feel it can't be that hard. They seem to have no clue how the industry works or what the words mean. I've had to educate a few, and it is very frustrating. Not like the good old days when the recruiters were true professionals that knew the business, not someone just trying to move bodies, hoping one sticks.
John Julian
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Why should I contribute to a company who off-shored their recruiting jobs?
Considering it is HR that goes around handing out pink slips, I would be happy to see a portion of HR activity outsourced and the HR critters themselves handed pink slips.![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly, to say, HR is only the messenger of the bad news. The 'firing" manager is to blame. That person can make the decision, but cannot carry it out directly. They sit smugly in their office with the door closed as the employee receives the news and cleans out his desk. But, when you're the manager, that is one of the perks. Kind of like the Mafia. The boss gives the orders, but does not perform the execution.
|
|
|
|
|
An advisor at the local unemployment office told me that most contacts you get from headhunters are not for a job they actually have. They are just looking to add you to their database so their searches can match you to a future job more efficiently (for them). I've found this to be mostly true.
|
|
|
|
|
They're called senior recruiters because they recruit people who are so much more senior than they.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
awwwwwww you're getting soft in your old age!!
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: loosing ... most US kids nowadays cant speak the language either
Or write it.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
