Welcome to the Lounge

Clodetta del Mar13-Dec-13 5:16

Clodetta del Mar

13-Dec-13 5:16

even if nobody would believe it but i chuckled by reading this

(Anti)FeministSoftwareFoundation wrote:

C++

plz::raise_awareness of_the_following "I don't feel like it, try again later\n";
post_on_tumblr trigger("RAPE\n");

kmoorevs13-Dec-13 7:13

kmoorevs

13-Dec-13 7:13

similar to:

Quote:
•Instead of Booleans we now have Boolean+, or bool+ for short, which has three states: true, false, and maybe. The number of states may go up as intersectionality of the moment calls for such a need.

"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

BobJanova13-Dec-13 5:21

BobJanova

13-Dec-13 5:21

That's pretty funny.

"This repository has been disabled."

jschell13-Dec-13 10:08

jschell

13-Dec-13 10:08

I would be curious to see how it will meet the numeric challenge of the following requirement.

"After birth, a program rolls for a 40% chance of executing literally as the code is written, 40% of being "psychoanalytically incompatible", and 40% of executing by a metaphorical epistemology the order of the functions found in main()."

enhzflep14-Dec-13 2:33

enhzflep

14-Dec-13 2:33

"Access to this repository has been disabled by GitHub staff. Contact support to restore access to this repository."

Is unfortunately the message I got when trying to join in the fun. I guess that isn't so surprising given the other reports. Still, it would have been nice to see the whole gag, rather than just the punch-line. Big Grin | :-D

Re: "This repository has been disabled."

ed welch16-Dec-13 1:57

ed welch

16-Dec-13 1:57

try here: https://bitbucket.org/FeministSoftwareFoundation/c-plus-equality[^]

Re: "This repository has been disabled."

enhzflep16-Dec-13 2:26

enhzflep

16-Dec-13 2:26

Ahhaha :breathes: hahahahaha :breathes: ha!

I thought the punch-line at GitHub was funny. I'd never imagined the whole joke could be that funny and apply so many subtle and overt digs at the fairer sex. I'll share it with the missus in the morning since she''s got a fairly robust sense of humour. Zero coding knowledge, but that seems like a minor concern.

Thank-you so much! Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

CodeProject code everywhere

Rob Philpott13-Dec-13 2:31

Rob Philpott

13-Dec-13 2:31

I've just been writing a little tool at work and I wanted a busy indicator so I decided to steal the one out our main application. I had assumed it would have been an animated GIF or something, but no, it was this:

How to write a loading circle animation in .NET?[^]

Not seen that article before, but good work Martin.

You see, you write a little article and before you know it the code is in source control systems the world over!

Regards,
Rob Philpott.

I am doing a bad, bad thing!!

glennPattonWork313-Dec-13 1:26

13-Dec-13 1:26

If your saw a post of mine yesterday about getting a VB program landed on me 'to make it work' that is all, (it's not a complete rewrite in C# which is what it needs) I have done what I was dreading and it hasn't gone wrong yet testing abounds. I now move to the second part of the thing the flat file prep utility. Basically and ini file creator (which is then read in as a string dropping all /r /n picked out using substring)...which I have to add some serial port configuration to. It is a work of art, three different naming styles On Error Resume Next, GoTo used interestingly also this is using VS2013 which I have never used before...on the joy WTF | :WTF:

Roll on 17:30 and the weekend!!

HobbyProggy13-Dec-13 1:40

HobbyProggy

13-Dec-13 1:40

sounds like the coders were professionals!

I love this style, had to do the same Thing and i was so impressed by that style:
variablenames -> var1,var2 ...
if something goes wrong -> On Error Resume Next
no comments !
and no structure at all

was the best time of my life and i Keep up to follow that guide lines
thanks to the Person who wrote that code Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

glennPattonWork313-Dec-13 1:42

13-Dec-13 1:42

Ah my son, you know the ways of the hacker...

Dan Neely13-Dec-13 2:39

Dan Neely

13-Dec-13 2:39

The owners of the distillery that makes your beverage of choice were probably also having the time of their life. Cool | :cool:

Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius

Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt

glennPattonWork313-Dec-13 2:47

13-Dec-13 2:47

Don't jest tonight (being Friday!) I'm gonna get Nagyied/Darleked this is a cluster elephant in waiting!!!

Vark11113-Dec-13 3:45

Vark111

13-Dec-13 3:45

Wait - they purposely picked VS2013 (and .net 4.5 I presume?) and it still uses On Error clauses???

glennPattonWork313-Dec-13 3:53

13-Dec-13 3:53

Seems like it, I used to think On Error Resume Next was great (something has gone wrong, never mind, away!) then I saw it used in a control app front end (cutting arm, big saw), which allowed you to continue on after an error and cause damage to item under test. Haven't sinned since, mind you this is the first time I have used VB since VB6 many years ago...
[Edit] I think they used VB2013 Net because it the latest![/Edit]

Elephant Sky

Nagy Vilmos13-Dec-13 1:23

Nagy Vilmos

13-Dec-13 1:23

JFC! What a bunch of sunshines Sky are! They can go suck a puss filled begger's [redacted] as far as I care!

I was with O2 for my home broadband, it gave me what I wanted at a good price. Now Scum have taken over the service and they are elephant theiving mother loving sinshines! I don't have Scum TV - I don't want Scum TV or any other elephanting TV. I don't have Scum Talk their alleged telephone service - I DON'T ELEPHANTING NEED IT! [that said BT, what I are with, are pretty shyte too]

Now Scum in the money grabbing @rse elephant wisdom are charging me for not taking their services! £7.50 a month TO NOT USE THERE SHYTE.

Sorry, but Elephant You Scum! Elephant You and your little doggy! To complain there is no normal rate number, either E-mail the puss suckers or call their premium number. Sunshines, they're all froging sunshines. Mad | :mad:

As another point, anyone got a decent ISP which is nothing to do with money grabbing @rse elephant Scum or ~~Indian~~ British Telecom?

[edit]

Complaint sent to Scum:
Why am I being charged to NOT USE A SERVICE? I do not need, require or desire TV of any sort, so why must I PAY TO NOT HAVE IT? The same goes for Sky Talk.

This is borderline fraud, I did not chose Sky, I had O2 and was switched over to your service. It is disgusting that you won't even provide a sensible contact number, premium rate because I don't use your phone service? What if I did and had to report a fault? I'd have to pay premium again, this is vile and money grabbing.

Your service makes me sick.

Vilmos is not happy, not happy at all.

[edit II]
The mofu's have 'discounted' the charge for the next 12 months, I shall make sure I switch before the time is up.

speramus in juniperus

modified 13-Dec-13 8:20am.

Re: Elephant Sky

BobJanova13-Dec-13 1:35

BobJanova

13-Dec-13 1:35

TalkTalk seem ok (that's what my family use).

I use BT and I've not had any problems with them either.

Re: Elephant Sky

glennPattonWork313-Dec-13 1:38