|
In my role as the CP MD, in this situation I would recommend gin. Lots and lots of gin.
That'll be 12 guineas, pay the receptionist on your out. NEXT!
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
I think the tipping point was finding out that that thing bieber has had more number ones than Led Zep and AC/DC combined
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no accounting for the yoof of today's taste in music sound pressure waves is there.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: diety
A superficial being on a healthy meal plan? 
|
|
|
|
|
not if you're buddhist
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
what happened to i before e except after c !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
It's the sound, the word is not diety as in similar to a diet, but deity as in god - day it ee.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
So in the ever on-going wars of my kids circumventing internet safety fences (another story entirely), I have discovered I can use my cellphone as an internet access device. Yes, I know, late to the party. But what surprised me is the performance. My wired provider gives me 20Mbs down / 1.5 Mbps up.
On my cell phone (using it now), I'm getting 15Mbps down / 3+ Mbps up. 
That's stunning. Maybe it's 5am and it has no users, I'll have to continue to test. But, that's certainly fast enough for work.
Anyone else care to post their performance #s? I used speedtest.net (I'm on the east coast of USA).
Charlie Gilley
<italic>You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house.
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
My traffic Limit of 500MB per month prevents me from using my Smartphone as Internet access
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Mine is 2GB, but for unlimited the cost is not that much more (for me).
What surprised me was the performance. And cost-wise, it's competitive with what I buy from AT&T.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house.
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Well yeah that's truely impressive but not uncommon if you have 4G LTE.
The theoretical transferrate for dl is 100MBit as far as i know
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
What also would be interesting is: How is the latency?
For small packages a high latency is still not very desirable...
|
|
|
|
|
well, the latency was interesting. It was 5am, but I could play any of my favorite online games, no stuttering at all.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house.
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have that kind of phone, never mind use it. But I've heard that the connections from these phones provide decent bandwidth but moderate and variable latency. So they're fine for uploading and downloading large files, browsing the internet, and generally doing work, but they don't work well for things like gaming, video conferences, even VOIP (because the packet latency jumps around so you get skipping).
|
|
|
|
|
"Scorch port with injured back points to Old Frank."(11)
This is Very Hard, so you need your Thinking Caps turbocharged.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Scorch CHAR
port L
with injured back EMAG ?
points NE
to Old Frank.
CHARLEMAGNE
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
It always amazes me the CCCs that DD thinks are Very Hardtm but are solved in nothing flat.
I knew I had no chance of an obtuse riposte to this one, as soon as someone had 'char l' the answer was obvious.
Sorry Dave, not hard at all 
|
|
|
|
|
And yet one's I think are easy seem to cause the greatest trouble.
It is weird.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
I'm reading CCC with hope that one day I will understand the question - as plain English... 
|
|
|
|
|
It is plain English, it's just that the words are not in the order, or context, that you expect them to be. The clue is (usually) in two parts. One part consists of little clues that make up parts of the answer, for example the word "scorch" also means "char", in this case. The other part is the definition of the answer: in this case "Old Frank", Charlemagne was King of the Franks.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I'm talking about - scorch!!! Never heard of. I have to open dictionary to understand the words. Than to make the groups out of it should take week (port -> L... I've no idea why). Mostly I can't see it even after someone solved it... 
Maybe DD should do some CCC in other languages...
|
|
|
|
|
On board ships, they don't use "left" and "right": they use "port" and "starboard" instead because they are always the same relative to the direction the ship is pointing rather than the sailor. If the sailor turns round 180 degrees, his personal "left" and "right" swap over, but "port" and "starboard" don't. So "Hard starboard" means the same thing regardless of the direction any sailor is pointing. (And actually means for the ship to go left, not right, as it's an instruction as to which way to move the rudder!)
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I hope DD will use it again before I forget...
|
|
|
|
|
'Hard-a-starboard' means sharp left (push the tiller right) to some people and sharp right (push the ship to the right) to others. I think the modern standard is that it means what it says, i.e. turn the ship right; it changed when ships became large enough to be steered by wheels instead of tillers, where there isn't the natural reversal, and now applies to smaller boats with tillers as well.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
