Welcome to the Lounge

Richard Andrew x645-Feb-14 12:56

Richard Andrew x64

5-Feb-14 12:56

I like how your user name illustrates the fact that we are all just numbers in a government spreadsheet!

The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

AspDotNetDev5-Feb-14 19:06

AspDotNetDev

5-Feb-14 19:06

We are all unique! Globally unique...

_Maxxx_5-Feb-14 19:50

_Maxxx_

5-Feb-14 19:50

AspDotNetDev wrote:
Globally unique.

Do you imply off-world dopplegangers ?

MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011

.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')

glennPattonWork35-Feb-14 23:38

glennPattonWork3

5-Feb-14 23:38

What!!

Regular Expression - Achievement unlocked

jschell6-Feb-14 8:52

jschell

6-Feb-14 8:52

I am curious why that particular enterprise required drones to go above 400 ft.

Marco Bertschi5-Feb-14 9:35

5-Feb-14 9:35

I had the joy to take my first steps with Regular Expressions today (I have tried to avoid them, but I eventually got that they are absolutely inavoidable, especially when it comes to parsing complex strings).
So I present you my first RegEx:

([0-9]{4})-([1-9]|[1][0-2])-([0-2]?[0-9]|[3][0-1])[T]([0-1]?[0-9]|[2][0-3])[:]([0-5]?[0-9])[:]([0-5]?[0-9])?.?([0-9]{1,6})[Z]([+-][0-9][\.|,]?[0-9]?|[0-9]{2}?|[+-]?[0][1][0-2][\.]?[0-9]?|[0-9]{2}?)

Beautiful, isn't she? Blush | :O

And that's the string it will parse: 2014-2-5T21:36:14.315Z+1.5

Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos

OriginalGriff5-Feb-14 10:12

5-Feb-14 10:12

Well done!

Get a copy of this: Expresso[^] - it's free, and it explains, tests and helps create regexes. I use it all the time and I wish I'd written it!

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

Marco Bertschi5-Feb-14 10:16

5-Feb-14 10:16

OriginalGriff wrote:
Get a copy of this: Expresso[^]

Just tried it out - And I hand-crafted my RegEx! Well, learning it from scratch has never caused any damage.

Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos

BillW335-Feb-14 10:26

BillW33

5-Feb-14 10:26

The site OriginalGiff mentioned is very good. Another very helpful site is regexlib[^]; they have a large library of Regular Expressions. They also have a RegEx tester[^].

Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Mike Hankey5-Feb-14 10:56

Mike Hankey

5-Feb-14 10:56

I second expresso it's an awesome tool!

My site: Everything Embedded

Relax...We're all crazy it's not a competition!

Rajesh R Subramanian5-Feb-14 21:05

Rajesh R Subramanian

5-Feb-14 21:05

"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

Re: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

OriginalGriff5-Feb-14 21:40

5-Feb-14 21:40

You're welcome!
Good little tool, isn't it?
I was going to write one myself, but when I found this...

Septimus Hedgehog5-Feb-14 21:25

Septimus Hedgehog

5-Feb-14 21:25

I endorse that. Expresso is a very good regex utility.

If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.

modified 6-Feb-14 5:18am.

Matthys Terblanche5-Feb-14 22:37

Matthys Terblanche

5-Feb-14 22:37

WTF??? I hate Trend. This is what I get when trying to download Expresso.

Trend Micro OfficeScan Event
URL Blocked
The URL that you are attempting to access is a potential security risk. Trend Micro OfficeScan has blocked this URL in keeping with the network security policy.
URL: http://www.ultrapico.com/ExpressoSetup3.msi
Risk Level: Dangerous
Details: Verified fraud page or threat source

Cry | :((

OriginalGriff5-Feb-14 22:54

5-Feb-14 22:54

Strange...I downloaded it here and ran a scan on the MSI and it showed nothing.
So I uploaded it to Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3fwe3wtop741hpf/ExpressoSetup3.msi[^] - does that help?

Matthys Terblanche5-Feb-14 22:59

Matthys Terblanche

5-Feb-14 22:59

Ah thanks. I'll grab it from home since DB is also blocked at work. Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

OriginalGriff5-Feb-14 23:03

5-Feb-14 23:03

They are a friendly bunch, aren't they? Laugh | :laugh:

Do they allow you access to anything? OMG | :OMG:

Matthys Terblanche6-Feb-14 1:03

Matthys Terblanche

6-Feb-14 1:03

Yip, at least I can get onto CP, LOL.
No social sites, so I hope they don't investigate the full capabilities of CP Sniff | :^)

image processing toolkits | batch image processing

C^hris L^osinger5-Feb-14 10:30

C^hris L^osinger

5-Feb-14 10:30

gack!

i suppose it's a right of passage everyone has to go through. but whew Smile | :)

me, i avoid regex like the plague. finite state machines are so much easier to understand and maintain.

Marco Bertschi5-Feb-14 10:37

5-Feb-14 10:37

I had a bit help from an experienced colleague Laugh | :laugh:

The challenge is that it validates a Syslog-Timestamp.

Problem? Yes. Here are some examples of valid timestamps:

2014-2-5T21:36:14.315Z-1.5
2014-2-5T21:36:14Z-1
2004-2-28T21:36:14.315Z+1.75
2004-2-29T21:36:14.315315Z+0

You see the problem Dead | X|

Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos

PIEBALDconsult5-Feb-14 10:59

PIEBALDconsult

5-Feb-14 10:59

Marco Bertschi wrote:
it validates a Syslog-Timestamp

If it was written to some sort of log file by some application, why would you doubt it?

Edit: Now that I have perused the timestamp part of the RFC, I can state, "those are not valid timestamps".

This space intentionally left blank.

modified 5-Feb-14 17:31pm.

TnTinMn5-Feb-14 12:23

TnTinMn

5-Feb-14 12:23

I am probably misinterpreting the RFC 5424 spec that you mentioned below and/or a case of complete RegEx ignorance, but from this site[^] it states that a timestamp can be a NILVALUE (where: NILVALUE = "-"). Do you account for this in your code?

Marco Bertschi5-Feb-14 20:01