|
India.
And everyone of them is asking for help with homework!
|
|
|
|
|
Tuvalu?
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
"And if you wrong us shall we not revenge?" Merchant of Venice
A plague o' SMS o' both your mobiles:[^]
“The best hope is that one of these days the Ground will get disgusted enough just to walk away ~ leaving people with nothing more to stand ON than what they have so bloody well stood FOR up to now.” Kenneth Patchen, Poet
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps 'The Complete Works of Leslie Nielsen" would work too.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter a Microsoft has released the MFC Feature Pack in 2008, seems like they left it alone. No books, no detailed publication on that, just abridged MSDN 
It makes the use of it a quite difficult, although a lots of applications could benefit from it.
There still a lots of companies who use an MFC where the speed, light weight and high level of customization required. .NET is NOT always a best solution.
Would be good to have some feedback on this from the Microsoft, but it's not likely they read this forum.
So it would be good here, on CodeProject, to consolidate everything related to MFC Feature Pack somewhere under MFC in separate folder. It would be just straight place where C++ programmers interested in modern looking GUI can read, contribute or ask the related questions.
|
|
|
|
|
You should perhaps put this in the Bugs and Suggestions forum.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Forogar wrote: You should perhaps put this in the Bugs and Suggestions forum.
Why would this be better in the codeproject bugs/suggestion forum? 
I am fairly certain Chris doesn't want to hear anything regarding the MFC feature pack.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So it would be good here, on CodeProject, to consolidate everything related to MFC Feature Pack somewhere under MFC in separate folder
This is a suggestion for CP, that's why.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure Microsoft don't read the CP Bugs'n'sugs forum.
Heck, they don't read their own bugs'n'sugs forum...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: bugs'n'sugs forum...
They have one?
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
It's called MSDN... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
oleg63 wrote: Would be good to have some feedback on this from the Microsoft, but it's not likely they read this forum.
You can find a list of changes to ATL/MFC on the Visual C++ Team blog[^].
oleg63 wrote: It would be just straight place where C++ programmers interested in modern looking GUI can read, contribute or ask the related questions.
Codeproject already has a C/C++/MFC forum[^].
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Randor, thanks for the links, but what I meant is:
What we need are modern native technologies for real (desktop) applications.
And dedicated place for it, where C++ developers can get help on modern GUI, and start use it extensively.
|
|
|
|
|
... strike again!
Thieves spend months digging 50ft tunnel under Tesco[^] and steal £80,000 from the cash machine, from underneath!
Now, I know they are criminals, and I know it's wrong, but...I can't help respecting that, and half hoping they get away with it... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I imagine that they would make more money per hour and with less labor flipping burgers.
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum wage is £6.31ph, so a 50 hour week will earn you £315.50.
That's ~£6850 for 5 months, assuming they pay no NI contributions.
So...Provided they have 11 members or less (and I'd assume they did) they are up on the deal...
And that's assuming they can find a job giving them 50 hours every week rather than one of the company friendly "zero-hour" contracts.
Crime does pay, it seems...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it's my aversion to hard labor that drove my earlier post.  However, risking ones freedom for that amount of money seems odd (yes I know there have been people killed for $2). If you're gonna do it, do it bigger than that.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not that high a risk, really - the tunnel is underground, so they don't appear on CCTV anywhere, and you pick up nice fresh cash.
I'm sure it's more complex than that, but if your alternative is 50 hours a week in Burger Hell for sod-all ad infinitum I can see the attraction!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
The workers at Tesco probably did it to get a raise
|
|
|
|
|
Not a bad wage. Tax free, split that with 1 or 2 other people?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Not bad at all, when you figure tax out of the equation - and I suspect criminals don't pay tax on their ill-gotten gains. 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
They do - but not to what we would consider the government.
|
|
|
|
|
There is more chance of the money going back in to circulation in the hands of the thieves, also big business doesn't do Tax in the UK thanks to their chums in power
|
|
|
|
|
In order to freely use a significant amount stolen money without raising suspicion, you have to slowly funnel the money back into the system using some sort of legitimate business that preferably provides services, so the forged sales transactions are hard to trace.
Or, you can get a middle man who funnels money in similar way, using multiple corrupt businesses owners, but then you pay a much higher rate than what you would normally pay as taxes if you gained that amount of money legally.
I learned all this from watching Breaking Bad.
.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
