|
Can I just point out one thing I find ironic about your rant against unnecessary cruft? The first half of your post is just build up to the actual issue! 
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted 
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Email signatures kill me. In the States, it's common for some professionals to include degrees after their names (e.g. doctors will put Quack McRubbish, M.D.). However, that's actually trickled down to some putting MBA after their names (even worse on LinkedIn). Those get mercilessly devoured by many. Disclaimer: I also have an MBA, but do you know what my signature is? Just my name. That's it. Oh, and the occasional made up title I assign myself (my nearly-silent protest to nonsense titles like "Internal Sales Support Analyst II"; you're an assistant, just put that), such as "Grand Chancellor" and "Commodore".
|
|
|
|
|
I can see some value in having M.D. after the name--so I know I'm corresponding with a doctor--but MBA is just lame. It seems like everyone has an MBA. Maybe it used to mean something, but not any longer. (I know a lot of people with MBAs that aren't too bright.) Now when I see those letters following a name in email, it just seems like the person is trying too hard.
|
|
|
|
|
And yet no one is bothered by the "signatures" in the forum posts here that contain inane quotes--often many lines longer than the content?
|
|
|
|
|
And I was complaining that 4 lines signatures were too long...
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't read all of the messages in this thread so maybe someone else has already pointed this out but is it possible that the individual sending the email just doesn't know how to change her signature?
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-28343060[^]
I thought it already had been. That said I read somewhere (here maybe) that its much better in the USA.
That's my only grump with my otherwise wonderful windows phone - Bing is integrated into it.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not want to be forgotten. But some things I would rather forget. Whom do I turn to for that?
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
megaadam wrote: Whom What do I turn to for that?
![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) of couse!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Bing, I'll forget you straight away!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master.Man1980 wrote: I already said it before
Great. There's nothing we like more than reposts.
|
|
|
|
|
you think he works for MS? (or Nokia)
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: There's nothing we like more than reposts.
You can say that again.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing we like more than reposts.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You can say that again.
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing we like more than reposts
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: There's nothing we like more than reposts
Kinda looks like a repost, but I'm not sure!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
You can say that again.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: You can say that again
I have a strange feeling, nothing tangible so far, but more like a gut feeling than sooner or later I'll see a pattern emerging here.
I'll wait and see! 
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Repost
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
how can it be bad its the strategy taught at Harvard and is accepted practice at all US companies now matter how successful you must be seen to be reducing staffing levels to please walls street
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Master.Man1980 wrote: And once again, IMHO it's bad strategy. |
You want Microsoft continue paying people with no end value/profit for the company ?
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
