|
I can see you really don't like Adobe, much.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: I can see you really don't like Adobe, much.
Dictionary example of the word "tautology":
I've used adobe products; I don't like adobe products.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
<GeezerWarStory>
We use Visual SourceSafe (yeah, I know, pipe down). Most of the dialogs in the application were created for Windows 3.1 dimensions  , fixed in size, and a tremendous PITA to use. Even the dialogs in the 2005 'update' that were resizable started out way too small, especially with items that have more than 8 characters in the names.
A little judicious editing of the resources in the appropriate DLL using Visual Studio, and voilà! Dialogs with much bigger controls that are actually usable.
</GeezerWarStory>
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know what I was thinking the post order is the opposite order that posts are read so after reading the post above I somehow thought this would be more about your exploits with Cliff?  My bad!
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, you see that all the time with MS utilities.
I suspect that it's because keeping the window a fixed size makes the interface a lot easier to code, as long as you don't care too much about usability. This seems to be a hallmark of developer-designed interfaces: who cares, deal with it, it's all there and it works doesn't it? (I'm not claiming to be innocent here).
You can see a stark difference in interfaces meant to be visible to consumers versus interfaces for tools and utilities used by admins and power users. You don't get a lot of the fancy we-care-about-UX goodies when it comes to programs made by and for techies, you're damn lucky it's not a command-line interface with no documentation (remember NT?)
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: Why do some windows (specifically in Microsoft applications, but I am sure in others too) have a fixed size?
Because if every window could be resized it would be chaos, like say, Eclipse.
Although I do agree with you that some windows really would benefit from allowing the size to be changed.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't find is chaos using Eclipse. well, not because of the resizeable windows, anyway - for all sorts of other reasons!
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
It's disgusting. Sources have revealed that the raid on Cliff Richards house last week unearthed disgusting material. I have to warn you that you'll need a strong stomach when you find out what they have uncovered[^].
|
|
|
|
|
I guess there is no limit to human depravity.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
It's true. He deserves to have the book thrown at him. A really thick, heavy book.
|
|
|
|
|
Again and again. And again and again and again.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh! The humanity!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh thank you it wasn't naked pictures of Beiber, that would have ruined not only my supper but I don't think I could have recovered without mental counseling, not like she ain't got enough to deal with already.
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
|
|
|
|
|
New album tracks from Cliff Richard? I don't believe that! That would be the first time in several decades... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds like you're disappointed.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm REALLY sorry if I have given you or anybody else that impression. But my kid sister has been madly in love with him for 30 years, so SHE might be disappointed. 
Guess you can't choose your family, but you can unfollow them on Facebook at least... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I'm probably on the wrong website, but I've been wondering about this for the entire day now and no one could give me a satisfactory answer.
Is the following sentence correct? "I sat on the couch and was hungry."
Or should it be "I sat on the couch and I was hungry."
Or are both correct?
In the second sentence you could make two sentences by removing "and". In the first sentence this would leave the incomplete sentence "was hungry" (who was hungry?). I remember having something about this at school, but that's over ten years ago and I can't remember what it was.
I'm Dutch, but I somehow think this is an English thing too. In fact you can simply replace the words with their Dutch counterparts and you'd have the same (correct) sentence.
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Or are both correct?
They are both correct. The difference being that the first one is just one sentence and the second one is a conjunction of two sentences. The only nitpicky thing to make the second one more proper would be to add a comma. Ergo...
I sat on the couch and was hungry.
I sat on the couch, and I was hungry.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
We were taught not to put a comma before a conjunction since it would be redundant.
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: since it would be redundant.
You can say that again.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
You can say... oh.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, there is nothing we like more than reposts.
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: If both sides are complete sentences, it should have a comma.
Perhaps that is common/accepted usage in the US but when I went to school in London 376 years ago my English master, Mr Williams, as I recall, (a very stern chap who also took our Latin classes would, now and again, lob a book at you when you started to daydream about escaping) taught us not use commas before conjunctions.
However, just had a quick recce online and it appears that there is a lot of conflict over what is correct in this context.
I guess it boils down to what you were taught to do at school. Because of that teacher it just looks wrong to me to put a comma there.
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: I guess it boils down to what you were taught to do at school. Because of that teacher it just looks wrong to me to put a comma there.
Oh I get it. To me using a comma for a decimal point looks odd. Way back in the day seeing something like £100 looked weird too when I'm all about $100, but I'm used to it now. Of course none of this is as bad imperial versus metric conversions. I mean having a unanimous system would just be crazy talk.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
