|
I find loading "Articles", after taking some time, gets "Latest Updates". The thing is, one has to have a filter tag in mind. So first I find a tag on that page, click it, then I've got the relevant content.
Jeremy Falcon wrote: all
It might be this ...
|
|
|
|
|
I see where you can sort, but not filter. I mean the search function pulls it up. So the question remains, how can one just browse articles if they don't know what they're looking for and just killing time?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yes sort ... I usually then pick "Sort By", "Created(New-Old)", which'll give up the time sequence.
Jeremy Falcon wrote: question remains
But that is the plaguing issue for which there is no logical solution here @ codeproject. Let me count the number of times I've attempted to receive a pat on the graphic spine by posting a Q in Q&A regarding the "tag" cloud issue.
As I see it "tags" refers to "more than one tag", hence the appellative "cloud".
Doesn't work. And as far as questions go, elicits perjorative rants from answerers.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, it's working now. I didn't change a thing! If any buttons were pressed that caused something to blow up, I'm blaming @Pete-OHanlon.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Good!
Jeremy Falcon wrote: working now
And so am I ... now for some Nailbomb ...
There, that's better.
|
|
|
|
|
I only told you to blow the bloody doors off.
|
|
|
|
|
Come on Pete, you should know better than to give a redneck a big ol' gun.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Well,
I guess you know me now. I'd also recommend Soundbooth to edit audio .wav converted from .cda; only if you've got Premier Pro. That, to save audio reversed.
First.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At best this still only shows articles updated within the past year. There's no window shopping / browse all area anymore?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I can't believe after 2 hours and 20 mins, I'm the first...
YOU'RE A DINOSAUR!!
|
|
|
|
|
You're too kind my man.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
oh sh*t i missed this thread.
MCAD
---
|
|
|
|
|
We always assumed that anyone browsing would give up after the 100th, so this page[^] should sort you out.
However, I have had on my TODO for ages now a "Hit me" button that would take you to a random article. Any interest in something like that?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We always assumed that anyone browsing would give up after the 100th, so this page[^] should sort you out.
I know CP is much, much bigger these days, but how would anyone just stroll across an article now?
Ironically enough, this is the same issue search engines have and why technologies like Gopher died out.
Chris Maunder wrote: However, I have had on my TODO for ages now a "Hit me" button that would take you to a random article. Any interest in something like that?
If it were like a random highly voted article that would be cool. Kinda like CP meets Tinder, could be an addictive page to be on.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Since I got ya here man, am I missing something or is all that's required to update an article's thumbnail is simply replacing the image file with a new one with the same name and then Ctrl+F5 the listing page like a wild beast?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
The thumbnail is automatically generated by taking the first (non-small) image in the article content. I could make it so you can override this if there was enough wailing and gnashing of teeth.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When I simply replaced the generated image with a better looking one though, the listing page went back to the default image rather than the show the new one or the old generated one. Was hoping to put something a bit fancier in its place.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: When I simply replaced the generated image with a better looking one though
Our system then replaces that with a less better looking one.
What if I simply added the option "Let me provide my own thumbnail file" checkbox that, if checked, will make the system not overwrite the file you upload?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That would be awesome. My only concern is people abusing it and trying spam on CP, but that's what editors are for I suppose. What about that being like a perk for gold + members at least?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
It's easy enough to abuse - and moderate - as it stands already. We should be good.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
We've been using git at work and after a few months of using it... it still drives me a bit mad.
For example: git pull origin branch
Should in theory be a specialized version of: git pull
...yet you end up in a weird limbo (now thinks your local is ahead of origin/branch) because the tracking pointer somehow doesn't get updated when you specify the branch (it does with the generic "git pull").
Anyone deal with git regularly? I keep finding some of these little inconsistencies that are driving me mad. I may just be partial to SVN since I used that for years but it seems like everything is overly complex for no good reason in git.
Don't get me started with hash values being used as commit identifiers. 
|
|
|
|
|
I completely agree. I may (very likely) be a dinosaur, but the particular use of git at one customer has me thinking of leaving.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I believe the git developers have been quoted as saying their approach was, "if in doubt, do the opposite of what was done in SVN"... it seems like an absolutely idiotic approach to something. Instead of learning from the mistakes in the past, you're bound to invent new mistakes... that's what I see in git, completely new mistakes (innovative mistakes in design?  ).
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: Don't get me started with hash values being used as commit identifiers
First they tried to use commit comments, but then they saw yours 
Ain't it weird? It was hacked together by a crazy egomaniac in an I'll-show-you all-nighter, so get in contact with the crazy egomanic I'll-show-you side of yours, and you'll be fine.
Here's the (at this point practically required) "Don't do that, then" - advise:
git fetch to update your local repo without making any other changes, then
git merge or git rebase to integrate your changes.
If the merge/rebase goes bonkers, you can always go back to "before limbo".
Srsly: Find a workflow that works. I found it pretty awkward that virtually every operation requires at least two commands, but you get used to it, then yo uget hooked on it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
