|
Watched [EDIT]Sunday's episode[/EDIT] last night. 
Wow [Edit]as exclamation[/EDIT] - brilliant.
[Edited for Pedants]
modified 2-Jun-15 12:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: GOT is Out of Topic.
So what's GOT?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: GOT is a DJ.
So is GOD (the divine djinn) or GOD Over Djinn.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: GOD Over Djinn
Nagy ? Nadjinn ? Nah, gin !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phew ... for a minute there I thought you'd said "I'm waiting for GOTO" 
|
|
|
|
|
|
What, all five seasons? 
And is World of warcraft really brilliant? It's ten years old...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Say hello to Leslie[^]
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny thing that: Added that comment, pressed Post Message and nothing happened. Thought it hadn't got posted so tried again. Then too uncaring to delete duplicate.
|
|
|
|
|
Karel Čapek wrote: Then too uncaring to delete duplicate.
It offends me that we get your leftovers. If you aren't going to give CP your best, move over to QA then. 
I've actually done what you did before a couple of times but both times CP caught the message as being a duplicate.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: It offends me that we get your leftovers.
Rather you get leftovers than me. 
RyanDev wrote: I've actually done what you did before a couple of times but both times CP
caught the message as being a duplicate.
It normally does but not this time: didn't spot it until someone replied to that rather than the newer message.
|
|
|
|
|
Watched it last night...  !!!!!!!!!
Amazing - getting better again.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree! I was long waiting for the meeting between Tyrion and Daenerys, and I'm not disapointed.
And the Night's Watch in Hardhome, omg...
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
When is Microslop gonna hire some real developers that can fix the godamn WPF designer? If you do ANYTHING that includes using custom UserControl objects, the designer chokes and pukes, rendering itself completely f*ckin useless...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Send them your C.V. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well they needed somewhere to put all the ex VB developers when they ceased VB development
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
As WPF is soooo yesterday, probably never!
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft never fixes/develops technologies that outdated (in their opinion)...Today you should step in line and use JavaScript with HTML to create a Metro Modern UI...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a common question, but my personal answer is still the same: the designer is quite useless in the WPF world.
The WPF/XAML framework excels for the templating, binding and high-decoupling system: really no other UI-framework is better. However, if you think to manage the UI by the designer, you probably have still in mind the "old-school" Winforms-like composition, which falls quickly in the famous "big-balls-of-mud".
WPF/XAML outdated tech? I don't agree at all.
They probably will push it off, but only because the majority of people don't want to ask a better UI-framework, and prefer to fight against the HTML anarchic world...
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
