|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: the error message is telling you exactly what the problem is
To be honest, App_Code.fk4bcd9f doesn't sound like an assembly you'd find easily...
|
|
|
|
|
 Fair point: but at least it's a start.
|
|
|
|
|
How many do you want?
I can email you as many copies as you need, for a very reasonable price... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You must be mistaken me for someone who's missing a reference to App_Code.fk4bcd9f 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, seems to be a conversion snag. Maybe a referenced assembly is still using the older framework.
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: the error message is telling you exactly what the problem is.
You've got to be kidding. That's a completely baffling error message, even to me, and I am probably the 42nd smartest guy on this planet. 
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. Go back to the unconverted application. Find that type. Boom! You've made a start.
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: Not really. Go back to the unconverted application. Find that type. Boom! You've made a start.
There's no such assembly. It's a Visual Studio generated intermediary. And the name/version etc. varies based on compiler version.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. But at least if you know what/where it should be/comes from/does, that's a start.
|
|
|
|
|
It's way harder than that. This seems to be a failed conversion attempt, or a partial success. It may even be a bug in the conversion, or a Nuget issue. There could be a 100 ways this may have been caused, and it will require an experienced person to sit and debug this through to fruition.
|
|
|
|
|
Start at the beginning. If you can figure what it should have been, you're on your way. That isn't to say it won't, ultimately, be one of the myriad other things it might turn out to be but you have to start somewhere. I've done many conversions from one version of VS to another over the years. Yes, it can get complex but quite often it is not.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a large solution with tons of projects, you may be better off getting a more experienced developer to do the conversion for you.
|
|
|
|
|
My life has become a race between me expanding the size of my Windows 10 VM allocated disks and Windows Update filling them up with system restore points... 
|
|
|
|
|
I'd assume there's a way to control how many of those it keeps.... or at least I'd hope.
I had an old Ubuntu Linux that backed up every single kernel it updated, after a while... it filled the OS partition.... luckily, it was easy enough to delete the old ones, I never really figured how to make it stop storing so many old versions (it was a Samba share server).
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: I'd assume there's a way to control how many of those it keeps.... or at least I'd hope.
Well yeah. Stop expanding the space available. It will then automatically delete as many of the oldest restore points as necessary to accommodate the newest. Same as it ever was!
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure its not supposed to fill an entire partition by default. Prob has a certain number of backups it tries to save (I.e. based on number of backups and not necessarily on space).
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: same as it ever was
Your fault! Made me think of this[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Ubuntu: sudo apt-get autoremove will trim it to the last 3 or so. Cleans up all sorts of other junk too, and kicks off grub update to tidy up the boot menus.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't know auto remove cleaned that up... Guess I never really gave it much thought though... Like I said, it was an old server with an old Ubuntu, still ran pretty reliably though.
|
|
|
|
|
When do you next come down off the mountain?
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant timing! I was on my way back up the hill when you posted. Not intending to be down again before Christmas, but you never know. Still the same phone number ... 709?
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: Still the same phone number ... 709?
Yes. If yours hasn't changed I have it in my phone.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I thought System Restore was turned off by default in W10?
It seems to have been ... er ... restored ... to default on for the system disk. Other disk/partitions remain default off.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been pondering for a while whether to upgrade to Windows 10 or not and would like the opinion of the brave ones out there that have been working with it for a while.
The old Dell Vostro 3500 has been running well on Win 7 and I don't really need to upgrade so it's more out of curiosity than anything else.
Cheers!
Andrés
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
