|
Garth J Lancaster wrote: I LIVE for that post, Marc
Actually, what's worse is that one of them said the UI (Javascript/HTML hosted in a CefSharp browser client) was ready for QA, so I volunteered to pre-QA the UI before we sent it over the fence to the "real" cough cough QA people.
An hour later, I had 8 pages of bugs.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Oh nice, give the old bastard who has spent years being nitpicked by QA a shot at your first UI 
Don't get me wrong I think QA people are essential but what a bunch of pedantic, anally retentive, irritating, annoying and bloody persistent sods they are.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Oh nice, give the old bastard who has spent years being nitpicked by QA a shot at your first UI
I must admit, I took great sadistic pleasure in the process.
Mycroft Holmes wrote: but what a bunch of pedantic, anally retentive, irritating, annoying and bloody persistent sods they are.
Yeah, aren't they wonderful?  Honestly, once I started to learn how to work with QA (part of which was, don't rely on them accurately telling you what they did to break your software), I started enjoying the process, because it did improve the quality of the product, as well as my code and I learned better architecture (ok, fancy word for automatic logging) as well as a result of my QA experiences. The best thing though was when we got to a point of working together, and I could ask them "I found this weird bug in my code and I can't figure out how to reproduce it, could you try?" That was great.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
The only good case I found for empty try-catch blocks, when your error handling (logging, emailing, whatever it is you do) goes awry 
|
|
|
|
|
Old story, even the Unix haters' handbook has it.
|
|
|
|
|
One petard wedgie, coming up.
Welcome to humanity, Marc  .
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Install a mail agent on each server, send all emails to the local agent, and let the local agent send it upstream to the actual relays.
Your emails will arrive eventually, even if the whole network is down!
You can tune the retry parameters on the local agents to be pretty aggressive on retries.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc,
In our little system we have email sending configured as a Boolean. Down when we're instantiating the class that sends the email, we look at that. If false, we instantiate an implementation of the class which writes to a local file instead of sending the email.
So, we can check content etc in development without the risk of "oops that was a real email address."
I wonder if something similar could be wired up for your error condition. Once you're in the catch block, fire off the email send, but pass the magic param which says "write to log/file/send up a flare/whatever."
|
|
|
|
|
At least someone is *trying* to handle/report errors. Better than ignoring them.
|
|
|
|
|
I did something similar. My program connects to a SQL database and when that database connection is broken an exception is thrown and logged to a message processor which also tries to log it to the, wait for it, SQL database. Which then throws the exception again.....
|
|
|
|
|
Alcohol is a direct cause of seven forms of cancer, finds study[^]
 Science: ruining fun for everyone.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
"Everything causes cancer" -- Joe Jackson
|
|
|
|
|
Not exactly his area of expertise, but he's right. You could see a living cell as a very complicated biochemical machine. Everything that can directly modify the DNA or interfere with its replication can eventually cause cancer.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Birth, the leading cause of death! 
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly.
However, moderation is the key here, that no one is talking about. A few drinks a month versus a few drinks a day...moderation - same goes for most things/vices. BIG DUH! 
|
|
|
|
|
Always reminds of the quote generally misattributed to Einstein "Insanity is repeating the same actions and expecting different results".
Wrong on two counts (at least):
1. Einstein never said it.
2. Even if he did, I don't think being a genius in physics necessarily qualified him to make statements on diagnosis of mental illness.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
He never used a computer; certainly not a web browser.
|
|
|
|
|
you have to die from something - shortness of breath, whatever - you can be the healthiest person in the world and get hit crossing the street (or these days, get an lead injection from some maniac with a gun) ... so you may as well do everything in moderation, enjoy, be a nice person, and not beat yourself up
|
|
|
|
|
Never acquired a taste for it. Phew, seven less ways to die for me. 
|
|
|
|
|
And not drinking causing some other cancer? ...
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Far and away the biggest causes of lethal cancer -- to the degree that nothing else is even in the same ballpark -- are oxygen and sunlight.
Unless you give up those two, there's precious little point in giving up anything else.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Well sure, what do you expect from something that is a cleaning solvent and can propel a A/FC funny car over 200 mph in the 1/4 mile?
Smoke dope, smoke dope, everybody smoke dope.
(That's the Beatles for the youngins)
|
|
|
|
|
But Alcohol will also help you forget that you just got a cancer.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just wait; this "study" will be debunked.
Even the article goes from certainty in the headline to "probably" within a few paragraphs. It wasn't even a study, but one person looking at what appear to be opinion pieces by various international cancer funds. The author's history also suggests she decided to find a link and allegedly found one.
(Not even a drinker, just annoyed at opinion masquerading as science.)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
