Bugs and Suggestions

   

FirstPrevNext

Re: Member details corrupt link Richard MacCutchan25-Apr-10 3:10 Richard MacCutchan 25-Apr-10 3:10  Luc Pattyn wrote: some people has/have entered tens/thousands/millions(?) of silly account names. Cry "havoc", and let slip the hamsters of doom! (with apologies to YKW). It's time for a new signature. Re: Member details corrupt link Chris Maunder17-Jan-11 20:31 Chris Maunder 17-Jan-11 20:31  Apologies for not replying ealier, but this is in our bug list. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Online counter going nuts Kristian Sixhøj24-Apr-10 9:07 Kristian Sixhøj 24-Apr-10 9:07  The online counter in the menu strip at the top seems to be going crazy - the number increments at a very high rate; it has gone from 50,000 to now over 60,000 in just over 5 minutes! Is it working alright? Or are the hamsters performing a DDoS attack in protest? Kristian Sixhoej "I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking Re: Online counter going nuts Chris Maunder24-Apr-10 10:05 Chris Maunder 24-Apr-10 10:05  The system to update that value had too much caffeine after lunch. All fixed. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Online counter going nuts #realJSOP24-Apr-10 12:37 #realJSOP 24-Apr-10 12:37  You have a whole system dedicated to updating that value? .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 Re: Online counter going nuts Chris Maunder24-Apr-10 17:11 Chris Maunder 24-Apr-10 17:11  Racks and racks of servers, plus a swat team of hamsters. I hope you appreciate how such a seemingly simple, yet dangerously complex task is pulled off with such a minimum of fuss. We almost make it look trivial, don't we? <buffs fingernails> cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Online counter going nuts #realJSOP25-Apr-10 2:08 #realJSOP 25-Apr-10 2:08  So, it's a system of systems - kind of a redundancy system system. I would never have imagined. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 Quick answers user interaction Moak24-Apr-10 3:56 Moak 24-Apr-10 3:56  Here is a little bit of feedback/brainstorming about Quick Answers[^]. Just some ideas to help. The current concept of differentiating between answers and comments doesn't work in my opinion. I see many users adding information by using 'Add an Answer' instead of using the 'New message' button on the bottom of the page. And I understand them, from a user perspective it's much more intuitive to press the first button. First you kinda answers questions other users had about the original question, secondly it gives everyone a very visible feedback (compared to the tiny message board on the bottom of the page). The first weeks I down-voted those "fake answers", but I don't do this any more, I just feel it's wrong to punish someone who explains himself and communicates with others. Can Quick Answers be improved? I would suggest a design change (do I hear Codeproject staff swearing?). Allow two types of answers: answers and comments (two buttons 'Add an Answer' and 'Add a Comment'). Then get rid of the message board on the bottom, as it is not needed any more. If the original poster wrongly adds a "fake answer" other members should be able to change the message type to a comment. The display will become one unthreaded list, with answers and comments. KISS principle[^]. Hope it helps! Webchat in Europe Now with 26% more Twitter Re: Quick answers user interaction Chris Maunder24-Apr-10 10:06 Chris Maunder 24-Apr-10 10:06  Give us about a week or so... cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Silverlight forum layout... Sandeep Mewara24-Apr-10 2:55 Sandeep Mewara 24-Apr-10 2:55  I opened silverlight forum and see only 1 page. Further, at the end of the page the asnwers are not sequential it seems. Identation too is broken. Tried F5 few times... same every time... Web 24 it is. IE8 i am using... Have screenshot if needed... Can someone look and confirm if it's only me or same for all? Re: Silverlight forum layout... Luc Pattyn24-Apr-10 2:59 Luc Pattyn 24-Apr-10 2:59  Looks fine with FF3.0 on Web19/20/21 Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict? We all depend on the beast below. Re: Silverlight forum layout... Ankur\m/24-Apr-10 3:04 Ankur\m/ 24-Apr-10 3:04  No, I can't replicate it. FF 3.6.3. No issue. [Edit] I checked with IE8 and web 24 (got that at first attempt luckily), but couldn't replicate the problem. You try again in sometime and see if it still persists. [/Edit] ..Go Green.. Re: Silverlight forum layout... Sandeep Mewara24-Apr-10 3:16 Sandeep Mewara 24-Apr-10 3:16  Strange... its the same with me Web 22 this time... IE8.. Will try after sometime and see... Re: Silverlight forum layout... Richard MacCutchan24-Apr-10 3:21 Richard MacCutchan 24-Apr-10 3:21  Check your filters to see if you are preventing display of some entries. It's time for a new signature. Re: Silverlight forum layout... #realJSOP24-Apr-10 4:11 #realJSOP 24-Apr-10 4:11  Maybe you need a newer version of Silverlight to see the forum. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 Re: Silverlight forum layout... Luc Pattyn24-Apr-10 5:12 Luc Pattyn 24-Apr-10 5:12  IMO a decent browser would suffice... Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict? We all depend on the beast below. Re: Silverlight forum layout... Sandeep Mewara24-Apr-10 23:59 Sandeep Mewara 24-Apr-10 23:59  found it working fine today! same browser.. IE8! Re: Silverlight forum layout... #realJSOP25-Apr-10 2:10 #realJSOP 25-Apr-10 2:10  That's a miracle in and of itself. You almost never here the two phrases "IE8" and "working fine" in the same sentence unless you're comparing IE8 to another browser that works fine. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 Spam attack - clean up in Aisle 5. Pete O'Hanlon23-Apr-10 19:49 Pete O'Hanlon 23-Apr-10 19:49  The Get Togethers forum is being well and truly spammed. "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes. My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx Re: Spam attack - clean up in Aisle 5. Chris Maunder24-Apr-10 1:42 Chris Maunder 24-Apr-10 1:42  Tuple<IBucket, IMop> = _cleanupFactory.CreateCleanupImpliments(Severity.Smelly); cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Spam attack - clean up in Aisle 5. Rod Kemp24-Apr-10 5:20 Rod Kemp 24-Apr-10 5:20  And something has stuffed the layout of the messages at the bottom of the forum. People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs Re: Spam attack - clean up in Aisle 5. Dan Neely26-Apr-10 2:24 Dan Neely 26-Apr-10 2:24  Still looks pretty nasty. 3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18 Suggestions tag cloud Moak22-Apr-10 20:52 Moak 22-Apr-10 20:52  Hi! Regarding tag cloud [^], I suggest to add new tags for boost (Boost C++ Libraries) and Unicode. And then I wonder why there is Threading and threads, perhaps one of them is redundant? Cheers, Moak Webchat in Europe Now with 27% more Twitter Re: Suggestions tag cloud Chris Maunder23-Apr-10 2:41 Chris Maunder 23-Apr-10 2:41  You can add tags yourself whenever you ask a question in Quick Answers. As to rationalising the tags: we're adding that functionality. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Suggestions tag cloud Moak23-Apr-10 4:09 Moak 23-Apr-10 4:09  Chris Maunder wrote: You can add tags yourself whenever you ask a question in Quick Answers. Hi Chris! Can you add tags that don't exist in the tag cloud, when editing/improving questions? Because I don't think you can, I tried to add Unicode tag to an existing question in Quick Answers and it got removed after clicking the 'Update question' button. That's the reason why I suggested adding new tags to the tag cloud. Not sure how it is supposed to work, if members should be able to pick any tag or only predefined ones. /M Webchat in Europe Now with 26% more Twitter

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 17-May-24 13:38 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...2141214221432144214521462147214821492150 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.