|
There is also a long standing bug that has affected a few authors where downloads for one article were being counted towards a different article. We are still finalising the corrections to ensure accuracy since we don't want to do this twice. Once we're confident we have all the dots joined together we will run a full rep recalc.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified 26-Apr-12 10:49am.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened?
I just "lost" about 700 points.
Best regards
Espen Harlinn
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services
|
|
|
|
|
See the message at the top of the forum. Basically: we found and fixed an issue (an out-of-date stored procedure that somehow slipped through our deployment system) so values will start undergoing corrections.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no, I lost... Well, I have no idea how many points I lost. That's the beauty of not obsessing about points.
|
|
|
|
|
In my case it was over 110 or so, and it was only from the "Author" category. Is it also explained by that very bug? The confusion factor was that the point history did show anything.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no! I lost around 2000 points. Very bad start of the day. 
|
|
|
|
|
I lost 200 points.. in "Author"
|
|
|
|
|
I think they were transferred to me. 
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I think they were transferred to me
In that case, they're well deserved - I was mortally afraid they had just disappeared
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services
|
|
|
|
|
Espen Harlinn wrote: they're well deserved
Would that that were true. 
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
For a good person, nothing is to be regretted. 
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes when adding a comment to a solution I get a massage saying "We have tried to update your comment 3 times without success. Our servers...". That's okay, but what happens is that the comment is lost since the text box for the comment disappears when the Submit button is pressed. When adding a solution the situation is different and in case of an error the solution box remains.
Could the editable comment box have similar behavior (not removed until the submit has succeeded or message cancelled by user)?
|
|
|
|
|
Mika Wendelius wrote: I get a massage
Hey Chris, is this some sort of new feature that's being provided?
If so, who drew the short straw over at CP headquarters to provide the service?
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's only one person with a mankini here, so take a guess.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...
you mean, getting a massage wasn't the suggestion? 
|
|
|
|
|
I moved some code from a comment to the question section in
this question[^], but despite all my efforts I cannot get the indenting to work. If you edit the code section you can see the spaces at the beginning of each line.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
I've fixed the issue on dev and will update the site this morning.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Get Article's HTML in offline is not working. I am getting error like this:
Something bad happened
We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Problem: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Ticket: 5111310
Server: Web04
Cheers,
Petr.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that. Problem fixed and will be uploaded this morning.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I one voted an article because I thought it was bad but then realized the author had made references to the shortcomings. The references were hard to spot earlier. Anyway, since I couldn't take back the vote, I changed it to a three. I would have preferred to cancel the vote because that didn't deserve any up votes.
|
|
|
|
|
Once you've voted, you've voted. There's no "take backs" in voting land.
|
|
|
|
|
Which doth sucketh, and I have pretty much stopped voting on articles.
|
|
|
|
|
You've stopped voting because you can't cancel a vote?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
