Click here to Skip to main content
11,479,170 members (65,131 online)
   

C#

 
QuestionRemote desktop in web application Pin
Chethan T R8-Nov-12 19:49
memberChethan T R8-Nov-12 19:49 
AnswerRe: Remote desktop in web application Pin
sirama20048-Nov-12 20:00
membersirama20048-Nov-12 20:00 
QuestionBad design? Pin
Daniel Sheets8-Nov-12 9:01
memberDaniel Sheets8-Nov-12 9:01 
AnswerRe: Bad design? Pin
Eddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 9:38
memberEddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 9:38 
GeneralRe: Bad design? Pin
Matt T Heffron8-Nov-12 10:02
memberMatt T Heffron8-Nov-12 10:02 
GeneralRe: Bad design? Pin
Daniel Sheets8-Nov-12 10:36
memberDaniel Sheets8-Nov-12 10:36 
AnswerRe: Bad design? Pin
Marcus Kramer8-Nov-12 10:28
memberMarcus Kramer8-Nov-12 10:28 
AnswerRe: Bad design? Pin
SledgeHammer018-Nov-12 11:24
memberSledgeHammer018-Nov-12 11:24 
If the "time consuming work" is more then a few lines, I'd say it is bad style. Its not bad style to call a method or mess around with the parameters, etc. That is often quite handy. For example, if you used the stock handler there, you couldn't pass in any arguments. Its often a lot more useful to do something like:

bw.DoWork += (x, y) => MyCustomMethod(someLocalObject1, someLocalObject2);

To be honest though, I've shied away from BackgroundWorker as I find async to be much cleaner.
AnswerRe: Bad design? Pin
Clifford Nelson9-Nov-12 8:57
memberClifford Nelson9-Nov-12 8:57 
GeneralRe: Bad design? Pin
Sheets.d9-Nov-12 9:04
memberSheets.d9-Nov-12 9:04 
GeneralRe: Bad design? Pin
Clifford Nelson9-Nov-12 23:27
memberClifford Nelson9-Nov-12 23:27 
GeneralMemory Stream Pin
Kushina8-Nov-12 8:04
memberKushina8-Nov-12 8:04 
GeneralRe: Memory Stream Pin
Kushina8-Nov-12 8:05
memberKushina8-Nov-12 8:05 
GeneralRe: Memory Stream Pin
jschell8-Nov-12 9:43
memberjschell8-Nov-12 9:43 
GeneralRe: Memory Stream Pin
Kushina9-Nov-12 10:58
memberKushina9-Nov-12 10:58 
QuestionTotal hack - but is it OK? [modified] Pin
harold aptroot8-Nov-12 5:58
memberharold aptroot8-Nov-12 5:58 
AnswerRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
Dave Kreskowiak8-Nov-12 7:37
mvpDave Kreskowiak8-Nov-12 7:37 
AnswerRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
SledgeHammer018-Nov-12 7:43
memberSledgeHammer018-Nov-12 7:43 
GeneralRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
BobJanova9-Nov-12 0:18
memberBobJanova9-Nov-12 0:18 
AnswerRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
Eddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 9:47
memberEddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 9:47 
GeneralRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
harold aptroot8-Nov-12 10:05
memberharold aptroot8-Nov-12 10:05 
GeneralRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
Eddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 10:24
memberEddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 10:24 
GeneralRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
harold aptroot8-Nov-12 10:43
memberharold aptroot8-Nov-12 10:43 
GeneralRe: Total hack - but is it OK? Pin
Eddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 11:13
memberEddy Vluggen8-Nov-12 11:13 
AnswerDepends on your goal Pin
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr.9-Nov-12 8:26
memberEnnis Ray Lynch, Jr.9-Nov-12 8:26 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.


Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.150520.1 | Last Updated 23 May 2015
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2015
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service
Layout: fixed | fluid