|
hence the thermonuclear suggestion...
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
the persistence is admirable !!
The intriguing part is, Even the subjects are clear indication that its spam and poster knows nobody is going to read even a single line and its going to be deleted in matter of few minutes.
Its beyond me why someone would do that!
-Milind
Hope that helps. If it does mark it as answer/upvote.
Thanks,
Milind
|
|
|
|
|
I heard some people get paid per click with the referral of a spam page, not for final result. Of course, the final (commercial) result is questionable, but if this the case, your (and mine) amazement about this phenomenon should be addressed to those who pay for spam, not this person. Could it possibly work, ever?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey, there was no need to do this. The poster asked a poor question. It's not abuse and it's certainly not clever to poke fun at them for it and what makes it worse for the poster is that you have such a high reputation - your MVP status carries an implied level of gravitas. We should be making people feel welcome to Code Project, not mocking them especially by making it appear as though they have been made fun of behind their backs. Please delete the content of your post.
|
|
|
|
|
(Sigh...) Whatever... By some reason, Delete is disabled right now, probably due to your reply post.
If you delete it, it's fine.
...You guys are too sensitive, think of everything in personal ways, and don't want to have fun. When I do something stupid (of course I do), I laugh together with those who make fun of me. I just don't want to argue -- it's different universe...
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: You guys are too sensitive, think of everything in personal ways, and don't want
to have fun.
Perhaps if you had a modicum of empathy, you could see that your attitude could cause offence to the OP. Just because we can laugh at ourselves doesn't mean everyone can, and CP is meant to be inclusive - this is why the rules at the top of each forum include instructions to be nice, and not to assert some sense of superiority. We're here to help people after all, and not here to massage our own egos.
|
|
|
|
|
I know, I know... That's why I don't want to argue. I'm not completely agree with you, but I prefer to be nice.
If you can remove the messages, it would work for me.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His two questions has been spammed into history, hist account needs a further single vote.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Done, but this person persistently re-created an account under the same name. By my count, it was re-created for 4th time already.
I don't know, perhaps it only makes it more manageable. 
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Don't complain. If he changed name, he would be mor difficult to find  
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I just tried to say.
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 of 5 for spammer
4 of 10 for spam 1
5 of 10 for spam 2
Have a nice day 
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My smacks added.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This member: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/bala1989[^].
At the moment, there are 27 "answers"; and I recently removed one; I probably removed some more in the past. I decided to check up all remaining "answers", and found only 3 real attempts to help someone; all other answers were the "answers" to own OP's questions. Not real answers, I would say. What is outrageous, they are all self-accepted formally.
To me, it looks like abuse. Generally, the questions and answers are pretty poor. I don't know, maybe this is a way to boost "reputation" — I cannot understand such behavior.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
"No more"
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
I saw them and voted not to publish. Good riddance!
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
