|
Then start by reading what is on the page before posting; then post your question here: Ask a question[^]
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry overlord griff.
Please this lamb as a token of my apologies
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Betty!
Where have you been? I've missed you... 
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
|
|
|
|
|
I currently use VS 2010 and was considering upgrading to VS 2012 but then a few days ago I heard about VS 2013 coming out in november.
Shall I wait for VS 2013 or get VS 2012 now? I mainly use VS for C and C# and a bit of WinForms occasionally.
.-.
|o,o|
,| _\=/_ .-""-.
||/_/_\_\ /[] _ _\
|_/|(_)|\\ _|_o_LII|_
\._. |\_/|"` |_| ==== |_|
|_|_| ||" || ||
|-|-| ||LI o ||
|_|_| ||'----'||
/_/ \_\ /__| |__\
|
|
|
|
|
Just stick with 2010 unless you have a pressing need to upgrade. If you do have a pressing need then jump straight to 2013.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the other member. I've used Visual Studio 2010 for the past two or three years. I don't consider upgrading unless there is something important that they have added, especially as 2012 has a silly layout and supports Windows 8 more than other versions.
|
|
|
|
|
We just did[^]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
That might be a very looooong wait!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it was 32/64 bit depending on what OS you install it on?
.-.
|o,o|
,| _\=/_ .-""-.
||/_/_\_\ /[] _ _\
|_/|(_)|\\ _|_o_LII|_
\._. |\_/|"` |_| ==== |_|
|_|_| ||" || ||
|-|-| ||LI o ||
|_|_| ||'----'||
/_/ \_\ /__| |__\
|
|
|
|
|
No. You can create 64 bit executables if you install it on a 64bit OS; but Visual Studio itself is a 32 bit process regardless.
When VS2012 was coming out of of the VS leads explained that the reason they didn't have a 64bit version out then was that there was a lot of old code that would need detailed review/rewrites to make 64bit compatible and that there was lots of lower hanging fruit that would improve performance for 99% of users. The plan then was that any bit of code that was worked on would be made 64bit compatible at the same time as the changes the required it to be modified until they'd worked over almost the entire codebase; at which point they'd backfill the rest.
With VS apparently going to a yearly release cycle their changing the plan and rushing a 64 bit version seems unlikely because it would probably eat all of a dev cycle leaving no other improvements for them to brag about on MSDN and Channel 9.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
If it ain't broke don't break it.
|
|
|
|
|
Few weeks back, we have upgraded all our computers to Windows 8.1 and Visual Studio 2013.
So far no problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Has anyone here been a member of Microsoft's BizSpark[^] program?
Do you know anyone who has been a member?
Do you think they would consider a one-man show to join the program?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about biz spark. But they approved me for the now defunct web spark program.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Did they ask you things about your financing and your office arrangements?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Did they ask you things about your financing and your office arrangements?
No to both. Good thing because My office is a spare bedroom. 
David
|
|
|
|
|
One of my friends has it, and he's really just a single-person company.
|
|
|
|
|
Well that's encouraging. Thanks.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
We're a two-man company, and we got turned down without explanation. We ended up having to buy an Action Pack instead. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to hear that. Do you think perhaps your product is not what they are looking for? They seem to be looking for stuff that is oriented around online services.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
As I say, we didn't get an explanation, just a rejection. As far as I can see, we ticked all the right boxes, but we obviously missed something.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: we got turned down without explanation.
Oh! that's odd. They should give you a reason.
Have you considered trying again?
|
|
|
|
|
Rutvik Dave wrote: Have you considered trying again?
We did - we reapplied twice, and were rejected each time without an explanation.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
