|
By the time we had finished, 22 of my developers described building a Foobulator with one who claimed he developed a predictive Foobulator with full transactional semantics and a priority queue back in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project. People invented a new way to do it
|
|
|
|
|
I see the opposite. All too often, for some Website, a control doesn't quite do what is required, but rather than build a specialized derivative of the control, the boss says "look online for a ready-built control that does exactly what we want, it'll be quicker than writing custom code". Then, after more time than the custom code would have taken, a suitable control is found, but yet another whole library has to be licensed to get that one control. That requires all sorts of red tape to get the purchase order etc... And a week later the whole thing starts again. It's ridiculous.
Of course, Microsoft is partly to blame (  ), so many .net classes can't be derived from properly due to non-virtual members and lack of multiple inheritance.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Too true, I've seen this happen in numerous stuff. You tend to find a lib which "almost" does what you're after. Then (even after all the red-tape) you then end up having to modify it so it suits your needs - only now you're stuck into design principles made by someone else, which in turn makes you compromise on other designs in your program.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, it does seem as if the "re-use" is not so much a situation of re-using your own code. Rather re-using the libraries or buying new libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Reminiscing years after WW2- when he could finally talk about his work - Capt Roberts said he had taken delight in reading Hitler's messages, sometimes even before the intended recipient.
BBC Report[^]
Old code breakers never die - they just drop below the entropy threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
For the first time ever, astronomers have discovered a ring system surrounding an asteroid. The finding is a complete surprise to planetary scientists, who are yet unsure exactly how such rings could have formed. Kid sister safe, kid sister safe. No, sorry, I've got nothing left.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't tell, you'd passed the three pint humour peak at this stage 
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
How will Microsoft fix the current incarnation, and will it learn its lessons as it creates Windows 9 ahead of a reported April 2015 release?
Die, live tiles! Die!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: When most people think of Microsoft, the first thing that comes to mind is Windows.
What does that say about Microsoft? haha
|
|
|
|
|
That they are insanely rich?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much.
I think the more important question is, if Microsoft is no longer to be defined by Windows going forward, what drives it? Azure? Xbox? It's sure as hell not Windows Phone or Bing.
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Basic for Applications...no wonder their marketshare is plunging...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus founder and active redditor Palmer Luckey took to the r/oculus subreddit to answer frustrated devotees' questions and assuage any fears that the Oculus will become little more more than a $350 Facebook machine.
"ALL IS WELL...ALL IS WELL"
|
|
|
|
|
East Asia has always been at war with Oceana
*spitooey*
|
|
|
|
|
And why your current one seems so amazing "At one time we had wisdom, but little knowledge. Now we have a great deal of knowledge, but do we have enough wisdom to deal with that knowledge?"
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that Microsoft's programmers weren't afraid to joke around a little bit while they were first coding some of its biggest software titles back in the '80s. Just in case you don't feel like strolling through (16-bit) memory lane
|
|
|
|
|
Does the code preach devil worship if you read it backwards?
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen that yet, but I understand Paul is dead.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe that explains the abbreviations for SHell ITEM ID[^] and Pointer to an item ID List[^]. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
In an unusual move, Google is responding directly to former TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington’s allegation that it accessed his Gmail account to root out his source for a major story. Other reasons, just not necessarily leakers
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Other reasons, just not necessarily leakers
Bingo.
To sell ads? To keep track of your purchases via email receipts? To farm data wholesale and hand it off to the NSA? Sure.
Leakers?
NEVER!
Guck Foogle.
|
|
|
|
|
The programming world's favorite distributed version control system also lets you find, share, and improve code. Here's how to make Git and GitHub work better for you And workspaces
|
|
|
|
|
Now if only they could slap some sense into those infuriating neophytes who think Git and GitHub are the same thing.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
