|
Forogar wrote: other than just ignoring them?
What's wrong with that one?
|
|
|
|
|
Just wave them away while saying "bah".
It's the Dogbert method that never fails 
|
|
|
|
|
Finally! An answer I can use!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I did but it wasn't as satisfying as I'd hoped.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Click the spam/abuse link.
|
|
|
|
|
Why? Just because someone disagrees with you or you are sick of them does not necessarily mean that they are being abusive. In my opinion, this is the worst advice to give in this case. This option should be reserved for when someone is being abusive rather than having a disagreement with you.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Just because someone disagrees with you or you are sick of them does not necessarily mean that they are being abusive.
I agree with that.
But the OP was complaining about someone who is an annoying fanantic arguing for the sake of argument. That is different from disagreeing or debating. Perhaps I misinterpreted what he is saying?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please no. Contrary to popular belief, it's not actually a substitute for downvoting.
|
|
|
|
|
.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
You could try the obligatory Dilbert[^] way, suitably modified.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
The worst part is that others will take their "reasoning" for "the truth" 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
A bit over the top perhaps but I like this:
One belief, more than any other, is responsible for the slaughter of individuals on the altars of the great historical ideals – justice or progress or the happiness of future generations, or the sacred mission or emancipation of a nation or race or class, or even liberty itself, which demands the sacrifice of individuals for the freedom of society. This is the belief that somewhere, in the past or in the future, in divine revelation or in the mind of an individual thinker, in the pronouncements of history or science, or in the simple heart of an uncorrupted good man, there is a final solution.
Two Concepts of Liberty (1958), Isaiah Berlin
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, it is natural to want to annoy idiots; we all have those urges. It is when we are in conflict with the idiot within ourselves that those urges become an intolerable experience to the self, resulting in night-sweats, tremors, visions of flashing-lights, terrible dreams, and the other symptoms you describe.
The answer lies not in suppressing those urges, or acting them out (which leads to shame and guilt), but getting in touch with your own inner idiot.
Think of your inner idiot as being like a small dog with one eye. Now close, or blind-fold, one eye, and spend 24 hours like that. You see ? Take warm food out of a can and put it on the floor: eat it without using your hands. You see ? Read an entire novel backwards (out loud), translating into idiotic, while one foot is in hot water, and the other foot is in cold water. If you are not fluent in idiotic, pick a novel like "Finnegan's Wake."
Improvise: as you learn to communicate with your inner idiot, you will find your own unique ways to enjoy their presence, and bring the urges to annoy idiots outside yourself to heel.
“Use the word 'cybernetics,' Norbert, because nobody knows what it means. This will always put you at an advantage in arguments.” Claude Shannon (Information Theory scientist): letter to Norbert Weiner of M.I.T., circa 1940
|
|
|
|
|
Bah! [waves hand dismissively]
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
"Bah" is good: it is a first step, no matter how tentative, and off-balance, towards contact with your inner idiot.
An unfettering of his voice so long stifled by denial.
Prithee, do not be discouraged by the task that lies ahead of you: it can be a life's work to tame the inner idiot.
And, what better place to nurture the inner idiot back from neurogenic catalepsy in the unconscious to vividly vicious expression than ... The Lounge !
cheers, Bill
“Use the word 'cybernetics,' Norbert, because nobody knows what it means. This will always put you at an advantage in arguments.” Claude Shannon (Information Theory scientist): letter to Norbert Weiner of M.I.T., circa 1940
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: it can be a life's work to tame the inner idiot.
Easy for you to say whilst sitting on top of the mountain. 
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Prithee
It is a long time since I heard anyone use that word in a conversation. In fact, thinking about it, it was probably me that used it! It is now my word of the week and I shall use it at every opportunity. Prithee tell if you have any objection too this.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Can I get back to you on that one?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: bring the urges to annoy idiots outside yourself to heel.
Where's the fun in that?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel that it is my duty to annoy idiots.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
You could always call JSOP. 
|
|
|
|
|
Effective - but perhaps a little harsh!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
