|
I'm saying nothing except there are 650 Members of the House of Commons and, according to the wireless, police have arrested 650 perverts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Must be just you - whenever you're dreaming that the politicians are all arrested, you should instantly know - that you are dreaming.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I dunno, but my thoughts when I heard about this[^] story was exactly that it would be like arresting every MP.
Which would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt you can get them all in one place at the same time.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Is it just me?
No there were 649 others.
|
|
|
|
|
Read the BBC news article on it.
"The NCA stressed that none of those arrested is a serving or former MP or member of the government."
That I suppose is good. The fact that it merits inclusion in the story at all is most disturbing.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably because of all the rumpus concerning 'Uncle' Cyril Smith, they want to make it clear the rest of the house is innocent*.
* AFAIC all politicians in all systems are guilty; it's just a case of finding out the specific offences.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like a few laws will be changing pretty quickly, then.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: 650 perverts...
How dare you malign perverts like that!
|
|
|
|
|
650 huh?
Between the US congress, supreme court, cabinet members, JCOS and chief executive the numbers work as well. Hmmmm?
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
|
- you doing java?
- nah, just watching pron.
- okay
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have the audio turned off on My PC with sub titles funny! 
|
|
|
|
|
Hilarious!
One thing though, the part where they say "Just watching porn", they do it on an Apple laptop. The dad wouldn't want that in his Microsoft home I'd think, yet he says nothing about it 
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I never understood this "Java runs on anything" malarkey.
The fact is that Java runs on anything that has a Java VM installed.
Windows is a VM, too. So's iOS.
Java ain't nuthin' special.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a little curious as to what you mean by Windows & iOS are a VMs.
Certainly, they each provide an API, but the instructions that programs contain are native to the cpu. Unless of course, I've been mistaken. 
|
|
|
|
|
They ain't hardware, so they're not "real", i.e. they're virtual machines.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...
You forgot the joke icon. That was what threw me.
If the omission of the joke icon was by design and appropriate for your intentions, I suggest you compare your internal definitions of Virtual Machine and Operating System with the ones that the rest of the world uses.
|
|
|
|
|
With all words of computerese, their meaning changes every five minutes (or every 200 blog revisions, where there are 2400 blogs), so just pick a definition of any word, and stick to it -- until some blog or book redefines it with a meaning that you prefer.
"Virtual" is one of the words that's had the most (and the most contradictory) meanings.
With Java, though, the whole "You can run any Java program on any machine on which Java is installed" is about as meaningful as "You can open any MS Word document on any machine on which MS Word is installed".
The biggest difference there is that you can write programs in .NET, within the MS Word about-as-much-of-a-VM-as-Java, so you don't have to get your hands and brain all dirty with Oracle products.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
We are about to receive our optical fiber connection and will go from a Vodafone Wireless Router (which is cr#p) and from a 800kb of download speed to a brand new optical fiber router at a great and symmetric 100mb!
The only drawback is: it has no WiFi so our cell phones and laptops won't be able to access our network...
I'm thinking on getting a couple of access points to allow any of those devices to access our network, and I was thinking on getting two Linksys N300 DUAL BAND WAP300N devices...
Our current router reaches half of the company, I would like to replace it for an access point and have another one placed in the other side of the company.
Any recommendation or something to consider? any preferred brand? I don't plan to spend a lot of money with them, but I would like to have a good performance and range.
Thank you in advance! 
|
|
|
|
|
I've had good service from one of these in a domestic environment though, albeit very 2.4Ghz crowded domestic environment. TL-WA901ND[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys,
I am bored..!
How about you? Could anyone share a joke...for me...??
modified 16-Jul-14 8:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
srinivas vadepally wrote: Could share any joke
Michael Gove
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
