|
|
He definitely had talent but never cared for him.
He looks like crap in the video and he acts like he's drunk or stoned?
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: acts like he's drunk or stoned?
Yes, although it wasn't an act. 
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I know, what a shame.
With every bit of talent comes a touch of madness.
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
I wished people would quit denoting of my alleged "madness". 
Either that, or explain to me of the talent I have! 
|
|
|
|
|
I have precisely two Elvis songs in my music library, both early versions. For me, toward the end of his life it sounded like he was imitating his imitators. (Netflix has an interesting documentary called Elvis '56. You get a sense why he got so big, though it still largely mystifies me.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: You get a sense why he got so big, though it still largely mystifies me
I have a much harder time figuring out why some of today's artists make it big.
He's not of my generation, but Elvis has my respect for having genuine talent.
|
|
|
|
|
Elvis Presley - too young to die, too fat to live.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like another case of "All the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order", to me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I've been putting together a new website for myself using SquareSpace, which is pretty friendly as easy to set up stuff quickly. Anyways, any comments, suggestions, criticism of what will become my new home[^] is appreciated.
Thanks!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
For those of us who live here, the "average Article rating" makes sense, because we know it's 1..5 so 4.61 is pretty damn good. But...I'd leave it out, or add "/5" at the end if this is for reading by non-CPers.
It would also be nice having that link to your articles list - the same way the text link does on the "About" page.
The about page is a bit text-heavy - it could use "breaking up" a bit - images perhaps? It just smacks you in teh face a bit after the clean, minimalist front page.
I like the puddy-tat! 
Overall, that's pretty good - clean, easy on the eye and holds the info.
[Edit]
A quick look on my tablet says the same thing: nice site to browse, but the "About" page looks even heavier
I like the tablet "Menu" - sweet!
[/Edit]
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But...I'd leave it out, or add "/5" at the end if this is for reading by non-CPers.
Done!
OriginalGriff wrote: It would also be nice having that link to your articles list - the same way the text link does on the "About" page.
The text "160 articles" links, but I also made clicking the image link to the article list as well.
OriginalGriff wrote: The about page is a bit text-heavy - it could use "breaking up" a bit - images perhaps? It just smacks you in teh face a bit after the clean, minimalist front page.
Thanks! That's a great idea. I'll do that.
OriginalGriff wrote: I like the puddy-tat!
Cool. It's a bit odd, but I like the idea of having some humor in the site, and "waking up the kitty" is the idea behind filling out the contact form.
Thanks for the great feedback!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I sent a feedback message via the contact page to see if that works!
I would personally take the email address of the page, if people want to get hold of you, they make the initial contact via the contact form. Also, you will want to have some form of basic Captcha or you will be spammed to death by the form robots.
Oh, the feedback message was about the message on the blog page, so hopefully you get the message.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: I sent a feedback message via the contact page to see if that works!
It does, and did, and I implemented your suggestion - thank you!
DaveAuld wrote: I would personally take the email address of the page
Done!
Thanks for the great feedback!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with OG on the fine points but overall I like it!
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: I agree with OG on the fine points but overall I like it!
Thanks Mike, I've got all of OG's changes done except the heavy "about" page which I'm working on.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Looks good on Opera / Windows 7.
I like the nice clean newspaper look.
Navigation is easy and I can learn about you and your projects easily and quickly.
One challenge was that I couldn't find links to your articles.
Was a bit confused by the codeproject snapshot and thought there was a link to your articles there.
Is there one there that isn't showing up in Opera?
Then I scrolled down to section showing list of articles and thought maybe I'd get links to your articles there, but nothing there either. Is that by design? Just offering constructive criticism.
All looks good / navigable / readable otherwise.
I actually wish my own site looked anything close as clean to this.
|
|
|
|
|
newton.saber wrote: One challenge was that I couldn't find links to your articles.
It was in the text "160 articles" but I also made the image itself a click-through.
newton.saber wrote: I actually wish my own site looked anything close as clean to this.
I'm quite pleased with SquareSpace (except the site looks like crap in IE, but they're working on that.) I've gotten customer service responses in under an hour from them, they seem quite good.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Software Engineer?
The title font is coming in as jagged, Chrome, windows 7. Could be my setup here at work.
I like the clean look. I'm a big fan for clean and simple.
I put software engineer because that is an architect and developer, really and it is common place title in the industry.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Software Engineer
No such thing.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Software Engineer
?? can't tell if you are joking.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: The title font is coming in as jagged, Chrome, windows 7. Could be my setup here at work.
Happens to me too. Looks best if FF. I'm trying to figure out how to use a different global font.
Slacker007 wrote: I put software engineer because that is an architect and developer, really and it is common place title in the industry.
Oddly, I just got a call out of the blue from a potential prospect because they were googling for "software architect" and came across my ancient Screwturn Wiki site!
I changed the heading to "Professional Software Architecture Consulting and Development", but I'm living with it to see if I really like it.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
It's good as a sitemap, but I'd think more about the main message for the main page and move the list of links down for the interested or put them on another page. It's difficult to find anything for the eye to rest on except the black image and that doesn't seem to be the real focus.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Brummer wrote: ut I'd think more about the main message for the main page and move the list of links down for the interested or put them on another page.
Thanks - that's definitely something to consider.
Andy Brummer wrote: It's difficult to find anything for the eye to rest on except the black image and that doesn't seem to be the real focus.
Exactly. Since that's my app, I changed the screen colors so the background is now white and re-snapped it. The big black blotch was also a problem for me.
Thanks!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
The font "Varela Round" renders with artifacts.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
