|
OK, that's interesting. Makes sense too.
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent - I ran a mile this evening... so three more years you'll have to put up with me.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, heck - that's obvious! The only reason I've lived this long is that I can run a mile faster than anyone who's ever chased me.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have to run faster than the bull, you just have to run faster than your mate!!
|
|
|
|
|
I used to be a miler, which was great for my condition, but when going longer distances you end up less running and more jogging, and jogging is downright bad for you.
Cycling is far healthier, anyway.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I usually do a mix between dumbbell exercises and short sprints. Over the years, I've done cycling, swimming, some running to train for a tough mudder, martial arts, crossfit. I like what I'm doing now which makes it healthier for me. It's all going to be healthier than sitting on your ass.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been running about 5 KM at 6-12 KM/hr speeds followed with 20 minutes of cycling. I believe that is good enough for me. To hell with these studies. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It's been listed there few days ago. I found the defn. of ADD so funny and redirect here.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: I am increasingly convinced the world of medical science doesnt know its arse from its elbow.
You haven't noticed all the money they make? If everyone was healthy they would go out of business!
|
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Yes, but you increase your chances of many other bad things.
Ah, you mean last years/decades research that says fat is bad for you.
Nah, sorry, you arent up to date on the latest Ryan, now fat is good and transfats are bad.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: News flash: I can lose weight by chopping off my leg. Brilliant! I think I just got the idea for my next novel!
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: News flash: I can lose weight by chopping off my leg.
Good point.
Some people might lose weight by chopping off their ass.
|
|
|
|
|
Eating more fat implies eating less sugar.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
SO you cut down on smoking by eating more curries do you?
|
|
|
|
|
One can replace calories with calories (fat for sugar), but not replace a smoke with curries.
Unless I can smoke the curries.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you eat the same sugar and eat more fat and get obese?
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you put sugar in your dairy products.
Fat/sugar ratios around 50:50 fool the body into thinking that you haven't eaten enough -- when did you ever feel full after eating ice cream?
I'll bet you never have; most people could continuously eat ice cream until they explode. You need to eat other stuff (either lots of fat or lots of sugar is OK) to trigger your body's "I've eaten enough" response.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing.... Plus the other day I heard that another study has found that a full fat diet does not increase the risks of heart attack or stroke.
Seems like anything else with science anymore.... Just wait a while and all the guidance and assumptions will change....
Truthfully, if I hear another "The science is settled" on any subject where it is still all conjecture, I think I'll puke....
Oh wait.... my stomach is rumbling.....
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, its all a crock of sh*t if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
|
There have been a lot of studies with these results for years, it's only now that it's reaching a more mainstream audience. I first started adding more fat to my diet after reading fatland ten years ago. It's a great read on how fat was systematically vilified over a period of years.
Munchies_Matt wrote: I am increasingly convinced the world of medical science doesnt know its arse from its elbow.
Before you do that, check to see how difficult it has been to do nutrition research, especially in America.
1. It's too expensive to get people to follow a prescribed diet for the years it takes, and then people cheat.
2. Surveys are one of the best tools, but then people lie, and mis-remember to feel better about themselves.
3. The Standard American Diet (SAD) is so awful, that almost any change has a positive effect. For example people cut fat by eating less fast food and improve. The effect isn't because of the fat, but that the fast food was so awful.
There are many other areas of medical science that can get much more accurate results, but even then there are so many other factors.
|
|
|
|