|
Really? Hope it's the transition period; all tools should better work in the same way.
Thank you for the note.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I take that back. Forums also seem to have the problem.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
yep, its broke. I'll get on it. Shouldn't let Chris 'fix' things just before he takes some time off.
|
|
|
|
|
Please also note that I also tried to work around it by providing equivalent anchors in the comment to the answer. The anchors was screwed up, too.
Some links in the answer post came out correctly after the post, and others, apparently looking of the same type, were screwed up. I failed to spot the difference.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I unsubscribed to the Daily Build Newsletter yesterday, but still got a newsletter today.
Brgds
Jonas
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please forward me (chris@codeproject.com) the newsletter you received? Was it the Daily Build or a different newsletter?
If you only recently unsubscribed you have unsubscribed after the newsletters for today had already started sending. In any case I've checked your account and you're not subscribed to any newsletters so please let me know if you get any further newsletters.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, already deleted it. I'll just see if it shows up tomorrow again, and then I'll get back to you.
|
|
|
|
|
The tip ng-bind vs {{ }} in AngularJs[^] was in moderation and I voted 1 with a comment. While posting the comment it got updated by a CP-Editor and then my vote was vanished.
Does editors' edit have a rollback function or similar? Or was it just because of the "simultan" actions?
Just curious. I don't mind about my vote, the comment is still there.
Edit:
I just noticed that after that edit it got automatically approved and is not in the approval list anymore.
Might be that the high-reputation of the editor just got it published without moderation?. Or is that supposed to be like that?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Approvals require a fixed number of approves, or a single admin.
Comments on pending items are attached to that version. On edit, those comments stay with the previous version. This ensure we don't have tons of "you have broken images" messages on articles.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
http://bugmenot.com/view/codeproject.com[^]
CodeProject user accounts on the open!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, not quite. These are all fake accounts that have been created.
|
|
|
|
|
But you can login with them...May the hamsters should kick them out...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you can, but they are fake accounts. To be honest, I don't see what they are bringing to the table as it's just as easy for you to create an account.
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose those accounts are for those who want to download files and don't want to create an account and go through a registration process (I don't know if you still have to be logged in to download files but this was the reason why I originally signed up)
|
|
|
|
|
All the more power to them.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The creatures who created, and run, BugMeNot are vermin.
« I had therefore to remove knowledge, in order to make room for belief » Immanuel Kant
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Was told to mention this here I did a Yahoo search (by mistake I was aiming for Google) and the following link came up http://codeproject.eu/[^]
Which I am pretty sure infringes on something hereabouts.
Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the catch. The legal hamsters have the scent.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
This one may be of interest too - http://www.codeproject.it/[^]
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting question indeed : Is it a copyright infringement to use a domain codeproject."something" ? Did you register every subdomain ? Probably not, because otherwise the names would not be available for other to use.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I think there is issue with the word Codeproject. I don't know much about such legal issues but i think we have ® in the Logo thats why others can not use them.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I just got a downvote on this massage - http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=4906070#xx4906070xx[^]
As it impossible to downvote in the Lounge via UI, I think it related to the fact that someone reported my post as abusive...
It is by design?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: massage
I guess the person didn't like the result.
(I think you meant 'message')
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a champion in switching vowels even in my first language 
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
This is how reporting works in the forums: A spam/abuse report triggers a downvote and increments the "abuse" points on that post. When it hits the threshold the message is removed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
