Re: Probable spam setup

Richard Deeming23-Jan-15 6:43

23-Jan-15 6:43

Spam: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4986921/The-Saudi-monarchs.aspx[^]
Spammer: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/nataliyaliza0[^]

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

Re: Spam

TheGreatAndPowerfulOz23-Jan-15 7:30

TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

23-Jan-15 7:30

Spam[^]

If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein

Re: Spam

OriginalGriff23-Jan-15 8:22

OriginalGriff

23-Jan-15 8:22

Spam deleted, member on 7.

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Re: Spam

User 1106097923-Jan-15 12:22

User 11060979

23-Jan-15 12:22

10 now

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

gone

Nelek24-Jan-15 0:13

Nelek

24-Jan-15 0:13

gone

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Probable spam setup - now confirmed

Wendelius23-Jan-15 6:38

Wendelius

23-Jan-15 6:38

This[^] by this[^] may well be a spam setup. Let's see if the payload arrives soon...

EDIT:
Yep, not the payload arrived from this[^]

It's all yours Smile | :)

modified 24-Jan-15 3:39am.

Re: Probable spam setup

OriginalGriff23-Jan-15 8:24

OriginalGriff

23-Jan-15 8:24

That's what I came here to say!
There'll be a spam answer, I'm sure.

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Re: Probable spam setup

Wendelius23-Jan-15 21:41

Wendelius

23-Jan-15 21:41

Didn't need to wait too long Smile | :)

Re: Probable spam setup

ZurdoDev23-Jan-15 9:30

ZurdoDev

23-Jan-15 9:30

Could be; however, I see no reason to mark anything as SPAM yet.

There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

Re: Probable spam setup

Wendelius23-Jan-15 10:22

Wendelius

23-Jan-15 10:22

No, not yet...

Re: Probable spam setup

Wendelius23-Jan-15 21:40

Wendelius

23-Jan-15 21:40

Now would be a good moment to report it Smile | :)

Re: Probable spam setup

OriginalGriff23-Jan-15 22:11

OriginalGriff

23-Jan-15 22:11

Just did!

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Spam would be article

OriginalGriff23-Jan-15 1:27

OriginalGriff

23-Jan-15 1:27

This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=156896&aid=868759[^]
From this: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11246993[^]

He's been here two months, it's his first post, and it's just a vehicle for the link to his blog site.
That's spam, to my mind!

Re: Spam would be article

User 1106097923-Jan-15 1:34

User 11060979

23-Jan-15 1:34

4 now

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

gone

Nelek23-Jan-15 9:24

Nelek

23-Jan-15 9:24

gone

M.D.V.

Spam in QA

Rajesh waran23-Jan-15 1:02

Rajesh waran

23-Jan-15 1:02

Spam [^]
Spammer:http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11397034[^]

Re: Spam in QA

User 1106097923-Jan-15 1:32

User 11060979

23-Jan-15 1:32

8 now

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

Gone

den2k8823-Jan-15 2:22

den2k88

23-Jan-15 2:22

Applied last kick

Spam

Richard Deeming23-Jan-15 0:32

Richard Deeming

23-Jan-15 0:32

Spam: Banner website in ASP.net[^]
Spammer: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/User-11362422[^]

Re: Spam

Thanks787223-Jan-15 1:06

Thanks7872

23-Jan-15 1:06

:Suggestinguniquevelentinedayideastoher: Wink | ;)

Gone

Thomas Daniels23-Jan-15 4:33

Thomas Daniels

23-Jan-15 4:33

Gone

[Gone] Big old spam hunt. Part XIII - 360 of 955

den2k8822-Jan-15 21:14

den2k88

22-Jan-15 21:14

All clear

~~spam[^] mer[^]~~

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

modified 23-Jan-15 8:23am.

Re: Big old spam hunt. Part XIII - 360 of 955

Thanks787222-Jan-15 21:23

Thanks7872

22-Jan-15 21:23

Reported all the messages and deleted. Members are on two atm.

Re: Big old spam hunt. Part XIII - 360 of 955

Tom Deketelaere23-Jan-15 0:13

Tom Deketelaere

23-Jan-15 0:13