|
super wrote: Just wanted to check if it makes sense to post article using labiview as the "programming language" ?
"labiview"?
Sounds like a pr0n app, not a programming language.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
For sure it is not something bad.
But notice that there is a possibility that not too much will find it useful - it depends on how may CPians use or plan to use LabView...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: it depends on how may CPians use or plan to use LabView
Well, it is handy.
Maybe if it were made a little more accessible, by a few articles, etc, on CP, more people could see if and how it could fit into their environment.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
You really are a glass half-empty kinda guy aren't you? This was your opportunity to say "heck yes, it'll help bring people who use LabView but who might not know about CodeProject into the site".
|
|
|
|
|
Should I delete my post? 
(Or pour more water into the glass?)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Or pour more water gin into the glass?
ftfy
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Same color - isn't they? 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Should I delete my post?
This is the Lounge, not a board meeting.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Which of these[^] is likely accommodate it?
Maybe, we can add a section on Labview.
modified 17-Feb-15 5:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
But no one ever uses Labiview as a programming language its badly written and unusable in a practical application.
(Labview however might be a good thing, I don't know having never used it)
I give up is it Labview or Labiview? or both?
my head hurts and going to go lie down
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Its LabVIEW, silly typo
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I only hope that the spam moderators will not miss the icon  ...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
modified 17-Feb-15 4:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wSBC5Dyds8[^]
I don't get it.
Someone rips a load of other people's work and mixes it all together just shy of randomly, and I'm supposed to find it what?
a. Clever?
b. Enjoyable?
c. A waste of my time on talentless drivel?
Hmm.
I think I'll have to go with c.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A robot choir producing unlistenable output.
|
|
|
|
|
Meh... Not even half as cool as Animusic[^]. And DELL Intell even did the real thing[^]! Now that's what I call mega über super cool 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
modified 17-Feb-15 2:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
Why DELL? It is Intel...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't matter who it wss; it only takes 30 seconds of googling to find out that it's a fake, using a synthesiser, and in no way can be described as "the real thing".
It's just a large-scale version of one of those cheap, plastic trumpets or guitars for three-year-old kids. Really not something to be proud of.
But I'll bet the marketing department wet their pants with joy, at seeing such a bullsh1t machine.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The real Animusic videos are pieces of art though. Keeping sound and video in sync like they do is nothing short of briliant 
The music sounds pretty good too (sure, it's digital, but who cares?) and the 'instruments' are pretty fantastic.
Not saying the phones aren't cool though.
I made the comparison because it's about digital music and keeping stuff in sync.
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Not even half as cool as Animusic[^]
That's a cartoon! Talk about comparing chalk and cheese!
Sander Rossel wrote: And DELL Intell even did the real thing[^]!
OK, so a big marketing department talked a big R&D department into building a machine.
BO-RING!
This is a bunch of telephones! No millions of (wasted) investment in custom-build, one-off technology; it's a bunch of phones like the one on your pocket, and a couple of developers to make it go!
You can tell that the whole thing was completely developer driven, because of the way the phones are laid out in a dull, dull, regular pattern with huge spaces between them. That would feel like the logical way to do it to some developers, but only appeal artistically to an accountant or a warehouse manager.
They should have borrowed a UX guy.
But I'd bet that a bunch of us from CP could do even better, just using our own phones and doing a few hours work -- no investment, no hiring or buying of manufacturing capacity; just the kit we carry with us every day.
That is where coolness is, not in the marketing departments of companies that can afford to waste millions on single-use junk!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The phones are pretty cool, but it doesn't beat the cool graphics of Animusic with some algorithm to make sure sound and image are in sync (and it really is, including hits, sizes, tones, etc.!).
The Intell stuff is pretty cool (you know, because we can). Not half as cool as the real Animusic though
Mark_Wallace wrote: That's a cartoon! Talk about comparing chalk and cheese!
It's about making digital music and keeping it in sync. At least that's what it was for me 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Regardless of whether it's real or fake, big budget or not, both videos look and sound pretty impressive.
My plan is to live forever ... so far so good
|
|
|
|
|
Very true!
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I'm doing a phone interview tomorrow with the lead tech guy and he, and I quote:
"wants to make sure that your strategies align more with Ruby best practices as opposed to a more traditionally .NET approach."
Now, what exactly does that mean? From my experience, Ruby developers have piss poor practices, but I really wonder Ruby brings to the table in terms of practices that are somehow different from "traditional" .NET approaches.
All I can think of is leveraging features like mixins that promote bad OO practices.
Anyone have a clue?
More generally, would you say that [Java / C / PHP / F# / etc.] has best practices that distinguish it from "traditional .NET" development?
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
