|
|
Gives the same answer for "dish" or "woman".
Looks more like a customized 404 than an easter egg.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Strange: for "what is your favourite woman?" I get a definition of "favourite".
For "what is your favourite colour?", I get a Monty Python quote...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I may have mistaken the "still computing" animation for the answer 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Result:
Blue. No yel-- Auuuuuuuugh!
(asked by the bridgekeeper and incorrectly answered by Sir Galahad in the 1975 film Monty Python and the Holy Grail)
|
|
|
|
|
I've been downvoted in the Lounge... 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I've been downvoted in the Lounge
The same thing happened to me last week - twice, on totally innocuous messages.
I didn't know that it was possible to downvote people in the lounge; the hamsters must really hate us. 
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
You can't downvote in the lounge - so some thin-skinned people use an "abuse" vote as the same thing.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I know, you get 5 points every time you vote "abuse" on a message. I wonder if someone is trying to accumulate points by voting "abuse" left and right on messages?
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
That's possible, but I would expect that too-frequent voting by someone who is not a Protector / Administrator would trigger a flag. Especially if his vote is the only one.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: but I would expect that too-frequent voting by someone who is not a Protector / Administrator would trigger a flag.
That would make sense, and such an abuse vote abuser should be banned as a troll.
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
I was never into brown nose points systems, it does not control me in the least and you should not let it concern you.
Truth can hurt
|
|
|
|
|
Dr Gadgit wrote: I was never into brown nose points systems
I don't care how many rep. points I accumulate, either. However, the only way to be "downvoted" in the Lounge is to have posts marked as spam/abuse. Too many of those could lead to banning from the site.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Same with me too last week, on an innocuous message.
Makes me feel that it is better to be a silent witness to the Lounge, rather than actively contribute to it. Am slowly reducing these Lounge postings.
|
|
|
|
|
I have reported your post for reasons I cannot share because ahhh... Other reasons I cannot share 
|
|
|
|
|
Avijnata wrote: Makes me feel that it is better to be a silent witness to the Lounge, rather than actively contribute to it. Am slowly reducing these Lounge postings.
If you do that, then the narrow minded morons win. Do you want a lounge where you can laugh, think, and relax - or a lounge where the only jokes are the people who post? The only entertainment is the narrow set of "permitted ideas" that rigid mindsets can cope with?
I know which I'd prefer.
Yes, we have to have "standards" - but Chris has been pretty explicit as to what those are. And with the exception of spammers, and a couple of trolls I can't think of any posts this year which violated them (except some the UK election coverage)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: The only entertainment is the narrow set of "permitted ideas" that rigid mindsets can cope with?
Pretty much describes the evolution of the lounge from the vibrant place it was a few years ago to the stagnant place it is today.
Although envisioned as a wild frontier the internet and subsequently the lounge has yielded to the ever intolerant forces of political correctness.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
|
|
|
|
|
Agree ...
... but am still cautious, because 'once bitten, twice shy'.
|
|
|
|
|
Any particular message?
Some people have really thins skins (or a low brain cell count, I'm not sure which sometimes) and abuse vote anything they even slightly disagree with.
Have an up to compensate!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, it was Weird and Wonderful[^], the downvote is disabled in that forum too though.
OriginalGriff wrote: or a low brain cell count
Enough brain cells to somehow downvote 
OriginalGriff wrote: Have an up to compensate!
Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
That got an upvote as well, which shows it was a "heavy hitter" on the abuse vote - my up resulting in a mean of three.
It doesn't take many brain cells to click a flag...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I up-voted it even though I use your initials all the time for a StreamReader object, sorry.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I might have to copyright my initials
|
|
|
|
|
Griff is right. I just voted it 5 and it didn't move that score much.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't even see the vote bar 
With all the upvotes it's been getting the -16 are more than compensated for though 
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
