|
Member gone, Tip at 3 reports.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
I have reported right now and was the first.
Maybe reposted another time?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably, because now it appears to be published, and now I cannot find any plagiarized info anymore.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey... (let's be optimistic) maybe he has learned from it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's trying QA as well with the same garbage - caught in moderation.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your post made me realize that I don't want to be an expert 
|
|
|
|
|
Is it the cuttin' or the gluein' you're trying to avoid? 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The member is on ten.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The third link on that page actually the OP's blog...(not that it make it better)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You know Google - it moves stuff around!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
His other apportations are at least blog entries as well.
How many of them are "legitime".... that is another question
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@OriginalGrifff, I am really upset to see that because of one sentence which I removed already in my last update(as soon you pointed me), you are still considering the whole article as plagiarized!
Please note, From the very first time in the link section(which I referred as "GOOD READ" in my article) i put that site url as a reference. If I had copied the entire article, or a good segment of that article do you think I would have point a link back to that article ?
The decision is up to you. If you still think deactivating my account is the right decision for a single sentence copy paste(which I removed already in my last update) then I have no say on it. Go CodeProject Go!
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is that we know you are more than willing to copy other's work and claim it as your own.
So we don't know that the rest of it isn't also copied from somewhere and we just haven't found it yet.
We really don't like plagiarists - mostly because we know how much work it is to write it properly, and to have someone else just go CTRL+A, CTRL+C, CTRL+TAB, CTRL+V and say "this is mine" is rather annoying.
So if you post plagiarised stuff, expect it to be rejected - and also expect your account to be closed as well.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I like the way you think but hey why don't you re-run your plagiarism script?
You said "So we don't know that the rest of it isn't also copied from somewhere and we just haven't found it yet."
> Run it and your confusion will be gone.
|
|
|
|
|
Why? Once we know you are happy to steal from other people, the onus of proof is on you to show it doesn't contain any more, not us to prove it does.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Because 99% of that article was unique. The 1% which was copied accidentally was already removed as soon you brought that on light.
|
|
|
|
|
We only have your word for that.
And frankly, your word can't be trusted because you told us the whole thing was unique when you pressed "Publish".
Try looking at it from our point of view!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
