|
You can't just narrow it down to those two options! 
You have to take the number of female drivers[^] into account! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
If there is a lot of room I tend to go in front-wise as I'm lazy. Otherwise I reverse in. I tend to prefer to reverse if I know it'll be busy when I need to leave like public car parks, supermarkets etc.
|
|
|
|
|
I have an app that decides for me based on the phase of the moon and the rain fall in Santiago during the previous 37 hours.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: the rain fall in Santiago during the previous 37 hours
Is that Santiago de Chile or Santiago de Compostela? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
With 20 Santiago's in Bolivia alone, I think you may have to widen those search parameters!
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's Benito Santiago[^]. Poor guy has to measure the rainfall wherever he is. 
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is only one way to reduce accidents - take the idiot from behind the wheel and have the parking done by professionals! This has the double advantage of there being no need for pedestrians to be anywhere near the parking area.
If that is not possible then in theory having cars pull in backwards and pull out forwards should be the safest option (assuming that you don't have cats, dogs, or people crouching in parking spaces on a regular basis) as the field of view is clearly wider to the front of the car and the obstruction of neighbouring cars is soonest ended. However ... back to the idiot at the wheel .... !
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse park unless there's a drive through spot.
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: Other say it reduces the accident of hitting the pedestrian walking.
So instead of backing over pedestrians coming out, they'll be hit on the way in.
super wrote: Starting next month, our company has decided to implement the "reverse parking" in out parking lot.
Find the person responsible for this policy. Identify his/her vehicle.
Now find the person who does the worst job of backing into a parking spot. They're usually pretty easy to spot as they're the ones with the bumpers scraped at the corners. Make him/her park right next to whoever proposed said policy.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd write a memo suggesting better carpooling, alternative modes of travel (bus, bike, walk) and telecommuting so as to increase the number of available spaces, reduce carbon emissions, and make the income disparity between the workers and the executives much more obvious. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: make the income disparity between the workers and the executives much more obvious.
Where I work the senior management get both their own car park and their own door to the building.
We know our place.
Interestingly if you are waiting for oncoming traffic to turn into the car park and someone coming the other way is turning in too, if they wave you across they then follow you into the pleb car park. If they don't then they drive into the management car park.
We know our place.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I'd write a memo suggesting better carpooling, alternative modes of travel (bus, bike, walk) and telecommuting so as to increase the number of available spaces, reduce carbon emissions, and make the income disparity between the workers and the executives much more obvious Personal Jetpacks instead.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Aha. you are that guy who gets promoted every year yet all hate him for being so no productive 
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I always park so that I can drive out rather than reverse: there is less of my car ahead of the driver's seat than there is behind, so I get better vision driving out. This helps a lot when the car to your right is replaced by a van while you are in the shops...
Don't care how the car next door is parked - it probably won't even be the same car there when I leave! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: it probably won't even be the same car there when I leave!
Because it's unrecognizable due to all the scratches you've made on it? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer to reverse in largely because I have a reversing camera in my car.
The car is also easier to manoeuvre at slow speeds when reversing due to the turning being at the rear off the car when reversing.
It also means hat when I exit my parking spot, I can look in different directions to look for other traffic.
The only place I don't reverse park is in supermarkets which pretty much force you to forward park so that you can get to your boot with a trolley.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, just be happy you have a parking lot... Here, we have to parallel park...
But that doesn't bother me... My car would just flatten those cars into pancakes... If it could leave its underground track, that is
|
|
|
|
|
At work, I pull through. Of course when I get here there are only about five cars in the lot.
I hate backing. Had a chance to earn good money driving a truck (many years ago) but since I cannot back one, I had to decline.
I own a trailer that I will not use if I know I will need to back with it.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
With front wheel steering, if you get the back end in the right place, you can straighten up by moving the front. Conversely, if you get the front in the right place, the rear wheels would have to move sideways to straighten up - and they aren't keen on that.
I find it easier to get the rear wheels in place by pushing them rather than pulling them & hoping they will lazily follow to the right place. Therefore I tend to reverse into a space. BUT - in supermarket car parks, this means you can't get at your boot to put the shopping in!
|
|
|
|
|
I always park in a specific direction: forward or reverse, but never both at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide a reference.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Please provide a reference.
int & willThisDo;
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
If you can drive at 200mph, you should bloody well be able to park either way.
Personally I like to reverse into a parking space whenever possible. It is much easier to see pedestrians while you are on the road than when in the parking space, looking over your shoulder.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
