|
I've been reaching this panel for years now using command-line fu. Press Win+R, type appwiz.cpl, hit Enter. Viola!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Windows 10 seems like it has a mind of its own.
For some reason windows explorer will always be on top, so when I open new instances of windows explorer they go behind what I DON'T want to see. 
But yes Kaspersky 15 blew up when I upgraded my older i5 laptop and luckily I had a 16 license as they say its Win10 compliant.
|
|
|
|
|
Weird...it works for me.
"Settings" in start menu search works (Settings [Trusted Windows Store App] comes up).
Search "Add Remove" in start menu brings up "Add or Remove Programs"
Search "add" inside settings (where it says "Search settings") shows "Add or remove programs" in the list.
That said, Windows has a mind of its own often times, I have no doubt it wasn't working for you. Perhaps it was still indexing all the apps and such on the system? I know at the beginning after I installed Windows I saw it say that results might be incomplete until indexing is done somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
It does - but that isn't what I tried.
Go into the "Settings" app, and use the search box there...it only finds "add or remove programs" if the search string contains none of the letters in the text... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The third search I listed in my reply is inside the Settings app. It brings up "add or remove programs" if I type in any of those words.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the problem with the whole concept of searching the file system to find the app you want -- you have to know what the developer called it before you can find it. Windows is a lot of things, but one of them is that its light years ahead of linux when it comes to naming applications. It sucks that you had to search for uninstall to find a tool for removing programs, but it could have been worse. Whatever giant snakes have to do with installing drivers, and musical genres have to do with file sharing, still eludes me.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
... There should really have been a Scotsman, Welshman and Irishman too, but they're still at the rugby world cup.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Scott was busy[^]
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
When you have to go, you have to go.
|
|
|
|
|
Ill bet he'll install electric bid spikes now
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you worry boyo - we'll be joining you within two games! (And the Scots will be in on Sunday  )
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm totally excited whos gonna win the cup.
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a bit predictable - the All Blacks are just awesome!
But as to the opposition? Could be Oz (which would be interesting) or Ireland (which would be a great game) IMO - but I suspect it'll be NZ beating Oz by 10+ points.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'd luv to see Ireland in the finals, but you are right NZ and Oz (Australia?) played very good, but was it South Africa playing that mashed muricas face 64 ? I mean they are totally in the game.
I'd predict SA - NZ and IRE - Aussies
going for SA - IRE :P
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know anything about rugby but based on your post, looks like England got knocked out of another World Cup!
|
|
|
|
|
Abhinav S wrote: Don't know anything about rugby
Sports for men without using plushi pillows to protect your self 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: Sports for men without using plushi pillows to protect your sel
Huuuh - in this sport its not likely you are going to be hit by a small red leather object at 140km/hr.
|
|
|
|
|
In American Footbal it is?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: American Footbal
Oh ok - that!
I was comparing rugby to another sport the English invented - cricket.
They do wear 'cushions' (or pads) in it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a whole different thing 
I mean Rugby and AF have at least some things in common
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Odd shaped balls? Insert commet here
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, today they do wear soft body armour in ruggers.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
What a bunch of wimps.  (As I run for my life when they send the crippled waterboy after me...)
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
But not all of them
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Our own world cup and a sport that we created (I think we created them all though).
Any ideas why India didn't take this one up, most of the other commonwealth teams play - even Canada and the US play this.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
