|
Garth J Lancaster wrote: NZ Kea is a pretty destructive beast
They're only destructive because they're very intelligent and very inquisitive. They'll open up your backpack just to play with whatever's inside
Amazing birds.
|
|
|
|
|
yeah - I realise thats their nature, bit hard to explain to a hire car company why the rubber has been stripped off it though 
|
|
|
|
|
From one of those articles Quote: There are people who keep a frozen dead crow in their freezer...
presumably to stop it becoming a Zombie Crow[^]?
|
|
|
|
|
Rub 'em liberally with neat washing-up liquid, to mask the flavour that the birdie likes, and give them one that it won't like.
I dare say that the manufacturers add dickie-bird attractants during manufacture, to pay for their expensive holidays.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I've been thinking... (A dangerous thing for me to do.)
The best solution is to build a quad garage for your cars with enough room for a "man cave".
In the "man cave" install a bar, big screen TV, couch, pool table, posters of your favourite ride (Lambo or bimbo) and workshop.
There you go.
- $50 wiper blades now safe.
- crows sorted.
- problem solved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have always been a little jealous because you use AOMEI Backupper to create images, and AOMEI has the nifty capability to browse through an image for individual files and Macrium's Reflect, that I use, cannot do that (or so I thought).
Then yesterday the pawpaw hit the fan: I upgraded Herself's computer from 7 to 10 with a clean install in February, and forgot to save some very special fonts she had in 7. I always forget the stoopid fonts when I rebuild a machine. She needed her special fonts and she needed them NOW, and the only place they existed, was in a Win 7 image I happened to take just before the change to 10.
Then I thought of a possibility: What if Macrium's Reflect can browse for folders and files in an image, and I just haven't discovered it yet? I mean, just like Griff says about AOMEI? With trembling hands I fired up Reflect and there it was on the 'Restore' tab: A link called 'Browse Image'!
To cut a long story short, I quickly copied the entire Fonts folder in the image and she had all her fonts back. Phew! That was close! For a moment there the doors of hell were opening before me! I could smell the sulphur and see Lucifer's malicious grin! 
I now believe there is little to choose between AOMEI and Reflect. Both are free and both can do all you and I will ever ask.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
modified 30-May-16 21:43pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: She needed her special fonts and she needed them NOW
I have no idea why I am laughing at that sentence. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Urgentz plz?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
It's a handy little feature, isn't it! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yup. Very handy indeed.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: For a moment there the doors of hell were opening before me! I could smell the sulphur and see Lucifer's malicious grin
Ah yes, without make-up they all look the same 
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
It that the age, married, having kids, knowledge base, handing the title as pendant, a combination of all or something else. I'm getting frustrated now a days not only in the office but here in CP too.
|
|
|
|
|
For me it was the job title.
Came with the experience.
Wasn't that old, wasn't married. Definitely did not have kids. Didn't wear a pendant.
By the time I got the "title" at a "real" company, I'd been working in the industry about 15 years ... and doing the job ... not just turning up and reproducing someone else's work.
I was also a "Senior" developer in my first job, by dint of the fact I was the only developer therefore the senior one (of one).
It's a badge. Ignore it.
|
|
|
|
|
Aren't they the guys with no reflections?
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing, absolutely nothing. The title has been so over used it is meaningless. I have seen people with less than 2 years experience claim senior developer while the same title may be applied to someone with 20 years experience.
As for your frustration you can always... no I'm not going there!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
It's like being a "manager" in a shoe shop.
I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been hired at two different jobs as the sole SW developer on a team of engineers. I was therefore, by default, "the Senior SW Dev" (and referred to myself as such on a few unguarded occasions). Of course, I was also the Junior SW Dev too (but let's not go there).
|
|
|
|
|
They should have the ability Meow like a cat, bark like a dog, fly like ninja ...
On a serious note, I expect he/she should have the ability to mentor, know the subject matter, explain the pros and cons of doing something...
I'm junior with few years of experience. I'm met few exceptionally(relative to my knowledge) good as well as dumbest(they might be smart on their own way) seniors.
On the CP side, it reflects the same way as of the above. That what I observed so far...
|
|
|
|
|
Vander Wunderbar wrote: have the ability to mentor, know the subject matter, explain the pros and cons of doing something...
yes ... often being presented with n-ways of doing something, knowing why/why-not for some of them should fall into 'senior' titles, not just because 'its cool/because we can', but "it fits with the business, now and in the future"
|
|
|
|
|
Blinding light from coke bottle glasses.
|
|
|
|
|
You question requirements and not just do as spec says
You know how to investigate application issue. You know problem is not always code
You have few languages/tools under your belt
You waste some time learning some tool/language that is of no immediate use to you
You don't post in Q/A asking for "give me code"
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
virang_21 wrote: You don't post in Q/A asking for "give me code"
Best response ever
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's definitely not knowledge base where I work. I know a few "Senior" developers who write null checks even for non-nullable types. And upon asking they claim that to be a safe practice. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
