|
My program folder is something like this : c:\MyProgram1.
And let's says that there's no problem about permissions.
What else should I do to realize that scenario ?
|
|
|
|
|
Putting your program off the root of C: will just piss off system admins. Permission control becomes an issue with them and results in more work.
Unless the SQL Server is local on the machine, you really don't have control over where the file goes.
But, if it is local, you have to execute the query to create a database manually and tell SQL Server where to put the files. Assuming SQL Server, you have to attach to the master database in your connection string and then execute the following SQL against it:
CREATE DATABASE MyDatabase
ON
( NAME = N'MyDatabase_data',
FILENAME = N'C:\MyProgram1\MyDatabaseData.mdf',
SIZE = 100,
MAXSIZE = UNLIMITED,
FILEGROWTH = 5 )
LOG ON
( NAME = N'MyDatabase_log',
FILENAME = N'C:\MyProgram1\MyDatabaselog.ldf',
SIZE = 100,
MAXSIZE = UNLIMITED,
FILEGROWTH = 5 )
All sizes are in MB by default. You can read up more on the CREATE DATABASE statement in the documentation[^].
|
|
|
|
|
If it's an existing database:
1) "Detach it" in Management Studio
2) Copy from the default location to the desired location
3) "Attach it" in Management Studio from the new location
|
|
|
|
|
Ok , but your steps are not the real scenario that I want.
- I have the program folder.
- The databases are inside the program folder.
- I open the program.
- The databases should be attached from the program automatically.
- When I close the program the databases should be detached automatically
|
|
|
|
|
"Connection strings" are used to "connect" programs and SQL Server databases.
You do not seem to know the difference between "attaching" a database to SQL Server and "connecting" a program and a database.
|
|
|
|
|
I want that the databases to be not be visible under SQL management studio , when my program is not open.
|
|
|
|
|
desanti wrote: I want that the databases to be not be visible under SQL management studio
Well that is not going to happen, you can't manage the SSMS application in your app.
What you can do is set permissions on your database so it requires credentials to OPEN your database. It will still be visible but non credentialed users will not be able to access it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry , but you get just a part of my words and try to comment them as you want.
I've said :
Quote: I want that the databases to be not be visible under SQL management studio , when my program is not open.
This is the full scenario :
- My program is installed on the client's computer.
- The databases are on my program folder ( not in default sql server's data folder )
- At this time the databases are not visible on Sql server management studio.
- I open the program , and at this point I want to attach my databases.
- After I connect to these databases.
- When I close the program , I want to close the connection with databases.
- After I want to completely detach them , so they will not visible on SQL server management studo.
Is it possible to realize this scenario ?
Thank you !
|
|
|
|
|
Actually you don't understand how a database management system works.
In SSMS a database needs to be attached to the server, any user with adequate permissions can attach a database including yours no matter where it resides. You cannot stop a user from attaching a database!
You can stop a user from accessing your database using the standard security functions in SQL Server.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Hello !
Is it possible to separate each project's form in different dll files , and to call them when needed ?
To be more clear , currently when the project is compiled , an .exe file is created and all the code related to different forms are inside the .exe.
Is it possible to change this behavior , so on exe to have only the main's form code , that just call other forms from dll files ?
Thank you !
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it is but at a cost of increased complexity.
You'd have to create a class library project for each of your forms. The class files in those projects should be changed immediately to inherit from System.Windows.Forms.Form. It's then possible to open them up in the designer and drop controls on them.
You're also going to have to change the InitializeComponent() method in each of those forms from "private" to "public" so you can call it from the calling form. This will setup the controls on the new form so that they are visible.
You then have to go back the project that's going to use this form and add a project reference to each of the forms that this form is going to use. You then can create a new instance of the form but you're going to have to initialize it yourself, something like this:
using (var newForm = new Form2.Form2())
{
form2.InitializeComponent();
form2.ShowDialog();
}
I don't see any benefit that outways the complexity of doing this, so what's the point?
|
|
|
|
|
I have some reasons , but maybe I'm wrong , so I need an opinion :
1) Different people take care programming of different forms
2) Some time 1 clients want some changes in one or same forms that don't affect the remaining forms. So they can be prepared as dll's and installed to only these clients.
3)The project use a database. In general the database is the same for all clients. But sometimes some clients ask for changes on database that affect the controls in one or some forms. But not all clients wants this. So we can prepare the corresponding database and dll's for these clients only and installed to them.
4) The forms contains some Entity framework queries , that may be different for different clients.
|
|
|
|
|
Separating this stuff into their own projects may work, but as I said before, it just adds complexity to your project structure and makes it ridiculously easy to ship the wrong .DLL's to the right customer.
What solves these problems is version control, like Git, SVN or TFS. Branching of the source lets you create multiple custom versions of the source code that can share code as well as isolate each branch from the others so you don't end up shipping the wrong executables to the customers.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: I don't see any benefit that outways the complexity of doing this, so what's the point?
I've seen the discussion in the Lounge.
Modularity comes to mind; if the interface to show the form does not change, one can easily update the dll without touching the executable. Doesn't mean that you should go ahead and put every class in a separate dll without thinking - that way the added complexity becomes unmanagable, without providing any benefits at all.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you !
But each form has a specific purpose.
And in general the forms for different clients are similar.
But for example :
One client need some extra fields in database , and of course need some extra controls on the form , some modifications to Entity framework queries , some extra/less columns in a datagridview...etc. But of course that I don't know this on the beginning , the client may ask for these modifications time to time , so I need way to update different clients with different modifications that they ask.
So in this case , I think to use separate dll for each form class.
If someone knows a link where I can see a simple project that use this idea , would be helpful , or this is not a good idea , and someone knows a better solution ?
|
|
|
|
|
Any example that shows how to create a separate project, add a reference, and invoke a form would do.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote a program that is now in use by quite a few friends and over the past few years, I've updated the program with additional field added to tables I need to develop a program that will make these change without me going to them and doing this in person. Can some one help me.
|
|
|
|
|
How can we help?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you haven't said anything about what you need help with, so I'll give you a large hint.
All SQL database engines are manageable by executing SQL statements against them. That includes security, adding/deleting indexes, tables, columns, and obviously rows.
So, you just come up with the SQL statements to make the required changes to your tables/columns/rows and execute those against the database.
|
|
|
|
|
Imports System.Data.OleDb
..
Dim provider As String
Dim dataFile As String
Dim connString As String
Dim myConnection As OleDbConnection = New OleDbConnection
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
provider = Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source = "
dataFile = "C:\DBtest\test.mdb"
connString = provider + dataFile
myConnection.ConnectionString = connString
myConnection.Open()
Dim str As String = "ALTER TABLE Items ADD COLUMN Rhour MONEY"
Dim cmd As OleDbCommand = New OleDbCommand(str, myConnection)
Try
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
cmd.Dispose()
myConnection.Close()
Catch ex As Exception
MsgBox(ex.Message)
End Try
End Sub
|
|
|
|
|
I have just written a very simple app that displays a form with a single ShockWave Flash control. It runs fine under VS and as a standalone EXE on my development machine (Windows 10 Pro). But when I copy the EXE, associated DLLs, and SWF files to a Windows 7 Pro machine and run it, all I get is a totally white frame. What else do I need to do on the customer machine to make it run?
|
|
|
|
|
Install Flash.
It's bad idea to make an application that's reliant on Flash because the industry is trying to kill it off. It's probably the most insecure piece of software in existence right now.
modified 1-Jun-16 18:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello geeks
My struggle with Updating data seems never ending. My latest code is as below:
Private Sub StaffInfoAdapterUpdate(ByVal conxnString As String)
Dim cmdText As String
cmdText = "SELECT StaffID, StaffName, blCampuses.CampusName,
Designation, DOB, Gender, NIC, DateOfJoining
FROM tblStaffInfo
INNER JOIN tblCampuses
ON tblStaffInfo.CampusID = tblCampuses.CampusID"
Using Conxn As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(conxnString)
Dim adapter As SqlDataAdapter = New SqlDataAdapter(cmdText, Conxn)
Dim strUpdate As String = "UPDATE StaffName
SET StaffName = @StaffName " & "WHERE StaffID = @StaffID"
adapter.UpdateCommand = New SqlCommand(strUpdate, Conxn)
adapter.UpdateCommand.Parameters.Add("@StaffName", SqlDbType.VarChar, 50, "StaffName")
Dim parameter As SqlParameter =
adapter.UpdateCommand.Parameters.Add("@StaffID", SqlDbType.Int)
parameter.SourceColumn = "StaffID"
parameter.SourceVersion = DataRowVersion.Original
Dim StaffInfoTable As New DataTable
Try
adapter.Fill(StaffInfoTable)
adapter.Update(StaffInfoTable)
Catch ex As Exception
MsgBox("Error: " & ex.Message)
End Try
End Using
End Sub
When I modify the StaffName for testing, the code does not throw any error, but does not update the record either.
Please note that StaffID is the Primary Key of tblStaffInfo
Please help!
I have a point to clarify in this respect:
Do I have to include ALL the Fields in the strUpdate; which are included in cmdText string; even if most of the fields are least expected to be modified?
|
|
|
|
|
Raabi Anony wrote: Dim StaffInfoTable As New DataTable
Try
adapter.Fill(StaffInfoTable)
adapter.Update(StaffInfoTable)
You create a new DataTable, load the data from the database, and then update the database with the data you've just loaded. There's nothing in that code that changes the data.
Are you missing part of your code from the question?
Raabi Anony wrote: Do I have to include ALL the Fields in the strUpdate; which are included in cmdText string; even if most of the fields are least expected to be modified?
You have to include all of the fields you want to update, along with the primary key. If a field isn't going to be updated, and it's not the primary key, then you don't need to include it.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Homer, for your attention. I am reading the data in datagridView and modify it there only.
Do I need to make changes for this scenario? Please suggest!
Regards
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
