|
I am OK with that being the default but they should allow you to enable a bunch of the stuff the removed if you want to and know how to.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: They all search for things in "Finder", which most of the time, I can't find.
Wonderful: that's what I call a Borgesian fillip for the synapses hovering somewhere in the threads of dark matter connecting mot juste and bon mot 
I can't even remember using the 'Finder on the Mac, and I was a dues-paying member of the Cult for ten years: that could be a sign of either mental health, or Alzheimer's.
thanks, Bill the Obscure
«When I consider my brief span of life, swallowed up in an eternity before and after, the little space I fill, and even can see, engulfed in the infinite immensity of spaces of which I am ignorant, and which know me not, I am frightened, and am astonished at being here rather than there; for there is no reason why here rather than there, now rather than then.» Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: One of the things I always experience when I'm forced to use a Mac (usually helping a friend with some website or something) is that I get this queasy feeling that there's a disconnect between the file that I'm viewing and the place in the file system where the file is stored. I can never find the same thing twice. There's no real "explorer" view that I can see, my friend simply keeps hundreds of icons on her desktop. In fact, I've never met a Mac user that organized anything into some sort of coherent hierarchy. They all search for things in "Finder", which most of the time, I can't find.
I use a Mac, keep my files organised just fine.. I actually have no desktop icons at all and know where all my files are stored. Perhaps it's just down to the individual users?
One thing about the "disconnect" that you mentioned.. macOS is built on UNIX so it does have the full range of file links that you see in UNIX/Linux. It's definitely worth getting to grips with the command line if you want to take full advantage of macOS and/or UNIX/Linux (at least, as a developer).
I use Windows and Linux as well, so maybe it's something you get used to when swapping machines all the time?
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: They all search for things in "Finder", which most of the time, I can't find.
Finder is actually the equivalent of Explorer on Windows. You can click the desktop and then hit CMD-N to bring up a new Finder window (when you click the desktop, Finder is automatically activated - check out the menu bar at the top). It's usually fixed to the left of the dock too.
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who doesn't use "libraries" and "views" instead of an hierarchical file system, these days, is considered behind the times.
The kiddies don't even know where to start with a file manager -- "Whu? But why can't I see all my photos in one place? I have to look for them?"
Mind you, it's not as wrong as it sounds. I mean, files aren't actually stored in the hierarchy that we use in file managers; that's just a different "view" that we're used to using.
The computer doesn't care how we choose to look at all the ones and zeros it stores on the HDD.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
In this week's edition of our open source news roundup, we take a look at Ubuntu going back to GNOME, universities in Maryland getting open textbook grants, and more. Grants are expected to save students enrolled in these courses $1.3 million in textbook costs for the fall 2017 semester
|
|
|
|
|
open textbooks - finally a chink in the armor of the textbook gouging industry. I mean, really, how many updates do we really need for high school, freshman and sophomore math, physics, chemistry, etc.?
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Google is quietly testing "Google Hire," a job applicant tracking system that appears to rival services like Greenhouse and Lever, Axios has learned. Does Google need my resume when they know what I had for breakfast?
|
|
|
|
|
We knew Microsoft was planning to block installation of Windows 7 and 8.1 updates on systems with Intel 7th Generation Core processors (more memorably known as Kaby Lake) and AMD Ryzen systems; we just weren't sure when. Now, the answer appears to be "this month." Golly, Microsoft. If you want me to use Win10 that badly all you had to do was ask.
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: Golly, Microsoft. If you want me to use Win10 that badly all you had to do was ask do a new wave attack of (silent / stealthed) "free" updates.
FTFY
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
lol, and the proliferation of virtual machines continues unabated for those of us who actually have to get things done...
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way they are going this over-the-top unless there is some hidden reason they want everyone on 10. The spyware? What else could it be?
|
|
|
|
|
Children refusing to put down their phones is a common flashpoint in many homes, with a third of British children aged 12 to 15 admitting they do not have a good balance between screen time and other activities. Child psychotherapist Julie Lynn Evans: “It’s a simplistic view, but I think it is the ubiquity of broadband and smartphones that has changed the pace and the power and the drama of mental illness in young people.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not a parent but I know a couple parents that use tablets/phones as temporary baby sitters when they just want the kids to leave them alone for a little while. Probably not the best idea in the long-run but then again neither is having kids in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
An ad blocker that uses computer vision appears to be the most powerful ever devised and can evade all known anti ad blockers. Please don't point your Superweapon at CodeProject?
|
|
|
|
|
The flaw in this article is the assumption that advertisers (who are basically low level thugs and criminals anyway) are going to obey the order to classify their ads. Just look at the colossal mess that the "do not call list" is. Illegal robo-calls for solar panels, fake cruises, burglar alarms, and all the other garbage they vomit on us is totally illegal. They don't care. If they had morals they would have "real" jobs and not be trying to scam everyone anyway.
That said, hurray for ANY advancement in ad-blocking technology.
|
|
|
|
|
In fact, he's convinced Apple, Google and Facebook will be bigger in 2075, the theme of next weekend's Silicon Valley Comic Con (SVCC), “The Future of Humanity: Where Will We Be in 2075?” I don't wanna live in the desert ... but hey, maybe I'll be dead.
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at history, the mighty typically fall. I cannot think of many companies that stayed number 1 in their industry for much more than a half century, because someone else comes along and does it a bit less expensive and a bit better and develops the competitive advantage that eats the giant away. Plus, you have to remember that countries subsides some of their industries so they can put people to work and significantly boost their economies.
My prediction is Google will live, Apple will still be alive, though probably owned by someone else, and Facebook will probably be dead.
|
|
|
|
|
jgakenhe wrote: I cannot think of many companies that stayed number 1 in their industry for much more than a half century
I don't know you, but I do know some (Monsanto, Car Manufacturers (Ford, Audi...), BASF...) and there are a lot more older than 50 years in the top companies of the world.
On the other hand, they do change name to seem a "new" company with "new" vision, "new" user-friendly-ness, "new" ethic code... and so on. But at the end, they do exactly the same as their predecessor (in Spain we say "even when you dress a monkey with silk, it still is a monkey").
Even when your
jgakenhe wrote: because someone else comes along and does it a bit less expensive and a bit better and develops the competitive advantage that eats the giant away. Plus, you have to remember that countries subsides some of their industries so they can put people to work and significantly boost their economies.
is right... the ones coming later probably are might be even worst than the current ones.
I could continue, but then, the thread should be moved to the Soapbox.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Continue with what? Assumptions? One should never assume anything; be it business or computing.
Ford is not #1, they're 6th in global sales. GM was #1 for 77 years, but because of poor management decisions, unionized labor, and a competitive disadvantage to lower cost Japanese manufacturers they're now #3 (some other things too). Toyoda and VW are the top 2, but 50 years ago Toyoda was nothing but a small government subsidized company with low costs and a great manufacturing system.
Audi is a niche luxury brand of VW and is no where near #1, though they're very competitive in their segment for the past 15 years. 53 years ago they were a small company named Auto Union; which VW purchased.
In computing IBM was #1 50 years ago, but they are a shell of their former selves.
Quote:
I could continue, but then, the thread should be moved to the Soapbox.
That is why I did not mention any particular company. You opened the can of worms. I really doubt the IPhone will be fashionable in 53 years. They don't have much else other than the IPhone; which is why I have sold my shares in them.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough... you were speaking about #1 on its sector and I was speaking on big enough to be there having a word or two on how the rules of the game are to be defined.
There are a lot of #1 that have fallen in disgrace, you are right. And perhaps there will be few current #1 that still hold the position in 50 years... but to say that they disappear is a bit too much too.
But at the end is as I already told... if they are not there anymore, there will be another occupying their place. And probably we will be even more insignificant for them than we currently are.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Fair enough... you were speaking about #1 on its sector
Of course I was; the article is about a bigger Apple, Google, and Facebook in 2075 and they're currently 1# in their respected disciplines.
|
|
|
|
|
Drupal developers are threatening to quit unless Larry Garfield, a developer who was summarily removed from the development community for his unconventional sex life, is reinstated. One site used the phrase "sci-fi hanky panky." This tickles me.
|
|
|
|
|
One's own private life is a serious civil rights problem that men are beginning to experience in the western workplace. I myself, was under investigation for holidays in South East Asia, because a fellow employee didn't like the idea of me traveling alone there.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
