Status: Aborted and it don´t works

Question

1.00/5 (1 vote)

See more:

Hey guys someone knows this problem?
I start an ajax request, but Firebug tells the request is aborted. If you now take a right-click and open the request in a new tab, the request works. So the code has no mistake. But why I don´t recive the answer on the mainpage?

JavaScript

var xmlHttp = false;

       if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {
           xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
       } else if (window.ActiveXObject) {
           try {
               xmlHttp = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP");
           } catch (e) {
               try {
                   xmlHttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
               } catch (e) {}
           }
       }

PHP

<?php
header('Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8'); 
header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, pre-check=0, no-store, no-cache, max-age=0, post-check=0'); // ist mal wieder wichtig wegen IE
$id = $_POST['id'];
echo $id;
?>

PHP

echo "<script>
	function loeschen ()
		{
		var loesche = document.getElementById(".$id.").id;
		xmlHttp.open(\"POST\",\"loesch.php\",true);
		xmlHttp.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded');
		xmlHttp.send('id='+loesche);
		xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = Callback();
		}
	function Callback ()
		{
		switch (xmlHttp.readyState)
			{
			case 4:
				if (xmlHttp.status != 200)
					{
					alert('Fehler');
					}
				else
					{
					loesche.innerHTML = xmlHttp.responseText;
					}
				break;
			default:
				break;
			}
		}
</script>";

Here i have the id:

PHP

echo "<a style='text-decoration:none; color:white' href='/Inhalte/Kategorien/".$kaufen[6]."' id='$id'  önclick='loeschen ()'>".$kaufen[0]."</a><br />";

Posted 21-Jan-13 9:20am

Chi Ller

Updated 21-Jan-13 9:37am

v2

Add a Solution

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 21-Jan-13 15:31pm

You present no evidence that "code has no mistake"... :-)
—SA

Chi Ller 21-Jan-13 15:33pm

But if the code would have some mistakes, it wouldn´t work by open the request in a new tab, right?

Richard C Bishop 21-Jan-13 15:36pm

Just because it compiles, does not mean the logic is correct.

Chi Ller 21-Jan-13 15:38pm

so now you have the code. You can convince youself about mistakes

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 21-Jan-13 15:56pm

I cannot see why. This is a pretty usual behavior of wrong code: working in some cases, not in others.
Also, you fail to follow simple logic. What do you call "right" code? If it does not achieve what you wanted to achieve, it is already wrong, in this sense...
—SA

Chi Ller 21-Jan-13 16:10pm

sure in this sense the code is wrong. But when I said there´s no mistake I mean mistakes like a forgotten semikolon, a wrong command,...

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 21-Jan-13 16:22pm

What you are mentioning is next to nothing. We never even discuss the code which does not compile.
OK, you tend to claim things without any arguments at all, so let me break this discussion. You cannot get help by definition, as you simply resist it. To me, case closed. But someone else might find some problem in your code, so -- good luck.
—SA

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 21-Jan-13 16:28pm

Oh no, sorry. That's not all. There is one totally unrelated issue.

And this is a big warning for you. I had to remove all your "answers" in this forum, and, by the way, for your own good. Such things often cause reports for abuse. A number of heavier abusers already lost their memberships, but I want just to warn you for now.

You "answered" your own questions and then even formally accepted them. Why?! This is cheating. Don't do it; no one will welcome it, if such behavior will be brought to the discussion of the community.

Consider you are warned.

—SA

Chi Ller 21-Jan-13 16:39pm

Wtf? That´s not cheating. I need help and nowbody could help me. So if I find the solution on my own, I gonna answer my own question and accept the answer. If now somebody else has the same problem he can easy find a working solution.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 21-Jan-13 16:46pm

I understand that you did not want to do something bad. You can do the following: if you have some interesting solution, you can write a small Tips & Tricks article (or a big one, if appropriate), and post it; you can reference your original question if you want. It won't cause abuse reports. What I say about abuse reports is just the fact...

—SA

Zoltán Zörgő 21-Jan-13 15:46pm

Do you have something against jquery? If not, try it. It will care about lots of hings, you would have missed.

Chi Ller 21-Jan-13 15:51pm

I "promised" myself firstly finish all actions by myself before using jquery :D
But I think the code is alright.

Zoltán Zörgő 21-Jan-13 15:57pm

I suggest you try it with jquery. It's a few lines of code only. If you get the same result, than your assumption will be most likely proven. If not, than you missed something. You can also use fiddler to see what's behind.

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)