Why we wont use private or protected access modifier in Interface

Question

0.00/5 (No votes)

See more:

SQL

Hi ,

 As we know Interface in C#. Its accessmodifier is Public by default. My question is why we wont use private or protected as access modifier in Interface. Please reply me with example.

Posted 4-Jun-14 0:05am

kamalsekhar

Add a Solution

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

CPallini · Answer 1 · 2014-06-04T00:09:00

Solution 1

Because, roughly speaking, an interface abstracts the actual implementation, while private and protected access modifiers typically pertain the very implementation.
The interface is a contract, hence it has to be fully accessible.

Posted 4-Jun-14 0:09am

CPallini

Comments

kamalsekhar 4-Jun-14 6:16am

Hi CPallini,
I did not understand properly. Can you please explain me clearly and one more thing, if we can use private and protected in interface in c#, How to use, please give me solution with example.