|
Well it might have something to do with the "missing" TOMTIT machine. Might be someone used it to get to Bob in 4/3/21123. Some stupid guard must have tried to stop the intruder with his De-mat gun, which will explain what happened to the Matrix.  well then that means I have the Defabricator with me instead of the De-mat gun.
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
I happen to know what Bob said:
Fire, walk with me.
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caerphilly.
Seen on a postcard yesterday.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give it some Scotch.
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
It's only a product promo, but it's a smart one: Nvidia reckons the judicious application of its graphics technology can debunk one of the world's favourite “moon landing was a hoax conspiracies”.
When asked to remove the demo, a spokesman for the company said "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
|
|
|
|
|
It proves nothing of the sort.
It merely means that by changing the data they can simulate the appropriate conditions under which the picture may have been taken.
It does not PROVE that the picture was taken there.
I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt that anything even the best scientists in the world could come up with would be accepted as a proof by non-believers. And believers already believe. So there is no point in trying to prove it took place, or did not.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
Quark.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Dalek Dave wrote: I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
Quark.
Come on, pretty much everyone nowadays recognises this a weird vegetarian cheese thing.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Cheese? I thought he was a bar-tender[^]. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
No. Captain of a garbage scow.
|
|
|
|
|
wow I didn't know NASA was that clever, fancy knowing in the early 70s that the stars wouldn't be visible from the surface yet still making sure that they were their and could be enhanced by technology 50 years later
kudos to them
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
So Dave, you asked for the demo to be removed?: Quote: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
Your final sentence: Quote:
I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
has far too many negatives for a Monday morning, I couldn't reduce them with a Karnaugh map, so I'm going home with a headache!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
So we're capable of faking it better now. Time for another moon landing.
|
|
|
|
|
Mars seems more interesting these days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In space no one can hear you nom!
|
|
|
|
|
"Cookies
Please enable cookies in your browser to use this site."
For a Mars Bar ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, a fake Mars landing is much more better, these days.
And, I'd also favor a fake landing on Saturn's rings. That would be exciting at least.
Give the audience what they want.
I don't want to be mooned any more. 
|
|
|
|
|
So then Uranus is out of the picture as well ? 
|
|
|
|
|
I do hope so
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Honest, LOL going on!!!
RUs123 wrote: So then Uranus is out of the picture as well ?
But also, I'm scared about why you would even ask!!!!?! Oops, I turned the corner on that one.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
