|
Yes, but my posts deserve it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Yes, but my posts deserve it.
I'd upvote you but you might get -40 points. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I do, but only if I try to write on Spam & Abuse or Bugs & Suggestions forums. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
It must be the Hamster Food 
With friendly greetings,
Eric Goedhart
|
|
|
|
|
I've just noticed I received -5 on 26 Feb 15 for a post I made back on 28 June 14. The thread shows no activity since the op (+ 1day) and no votes up or down. 
Interestingly, I had tried to help out in Q&A right around the time the -5 was awarded.
Oh well, I'm not here for points anyway. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
|
"When ice melts, it turns to water, [citation needed]"
The Internet would be a much sadder place without Randall Munroe.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Noticed that, but I did not understand the link though.
Which leaves me with that question : does ice really turn to water ?
|
|
|
|
|
I tried it with some dry ice, I'm calling this one busted.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: does ice really turn to water ?
No ice is water in a solid form. It [melting ice] doesn't turn to water it is water in a liquid form.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think I went to that party!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
When, did the punctuation police, arrive here?
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
|
|
|
|
|
"About five Bengal centres in party pills best served cold" (7)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
"Revenge"
--EDIT: Reasoning
About - Re
Five - v
Bengal centres - "ng" in party pills - "ee"(?) -> "enge" 
best served cold - "Revenge is a dish best served cold".
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Very good! 
"E" is a "party pill" allegedly. I wouldn't know anything about illegal narcotics. Honest officer.
You're up tomorrow!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, we all heard it: "My kingdom for an E pill". New and updated king Richard III
|
|
|
|
|
3 minutes! It took me longer to read...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Along with reading the clue, posting the answer took 3 minutes. I actually edited the post to include the reasoning. The "best served cold" part was enough for me to get the answer. The reasoning, on the other hand, had to be derived. 
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: Revenge is a dish best served cold
That's a Klingon proverb.[^]
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
|
|
|
|
|
|
They've just been waiting for the right moment...
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
So how long would a message have to wait until it's revenge worthy?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying a move up from 2007 because I'm setting up a new box (didn't want to risk rollback pain on my current one if a not-officially-supported addin ended up not working); and I'm finding that I can't get the conversation view to work right like it did in 2007. My problem is that the first time I open a conversation (either via a click, or the right arrow) it tries to be "clever" and show only a minimum subset of messages (hiding ones contained in quoted text). This sucks, (read it doesn't do what I want it to do) because it hides most of the conversational structure that's the reason I'm using it in the first place: to get a full view I have to click/arrow a second time. Is there any way to change it to fully open with a single action?
The option to Always Expand Conversations isn't what I want. While it does fully open the conversation in a single shot, because it triggers automatically if I leave conversation selected for more than a fraction of a second it makes navigating a folder of them by keyboard a major pain.
Is 2013 any better in this regard? I only went to 2010 because I'm underwhelmed by some of the styling choices in 2013; but not to the point that I'd pass it up for improved functionality for something I use a lot.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
