|
You are like most of the successful professionals.
The best programmers solve problems with whatever is given and provide solutions by any means necessary.
So, you solve problems. Be proud!!
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to find out the history of Aladdin’s Lamp, do you need a Genieologist?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
And if you want to check inside his lamps spout, do you need a Geniecologist? 
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
He'll first need to drop his blue genies.
Contrary to popular belief, nobody owes you anything.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I am nit-picking and ignoring the humor, but it should be Geniealogist. Since it is based off of genealogy.
Brent
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, because they don't rub it the wrong way!
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
I know the voices in my head are not real but damn they come up with some good ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
0
modified 31-May-15 6:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you should take your complaint to http://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx[^]
[Edit] I was looking at some of your messages and you are going to be flagged as abusive pretty quickly. A lot of your messages are quite rude and now you're posting this rant. Consider yourself warned. [/edit].
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Fr wrote: Why? I am quite happy without this.
So your rant is basically pointless and therefore... spam?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
That's fine. My options are:
1. Yes, my rant is spam.
2. No, my rant is not spam.
3. Hey, why do you call this "rant"?
But option 3 is not an answer to the question (we are programmers, you know...)
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: A lot of your messages are quite rude
This really looks quite rude, without any reason. But this is only Lounge, just a way to waste a time.
|
|
|
|
|
Your humour sensor appears to have been covered by a monochromatic filter today mate.
The intention is the important part (I believe) that's why it causes no offence when a word in one language sounds like a swear-word in another - it's the intention, not the implementation that's of higher priority.
I admit to finding the humour in some of Alex's posts a little less accessible than that of other writers, but it seems fairly clear to me what the intention was.
There's no need to speak as you chose to in your edit. Go visit a cemetery some time - everyone there thought at some stage that they were important and vital, that the world rested on their shoulders. Yet, still the world operates..
"When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, and I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
enhzflep wrote: but it seems fairly clear to me what the intention was.
Perhaps you can explain then.
enhzflep wrote: There's no need to speak as you chose to in your edit
If you look at his message history, you'll find a lot of places where he is rude to people.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Perhaps you can explain then.
Sure, I'd be happy to. You pick the list of posts you'd like explained and I'll give you my take on them.
RyanDev wrote: If you look at his message history, you'll find a lot of places where he is rude to people.
I did look, but came to a different conclusion to you. Accordingly, I made the offer just above.
"When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, and I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
enhzflep wrote: You pick the list of posts you'd like explained and I'll give you my take on them.
How about this one? You said the intent was humorous, explain how the OP is humorous.
enhzflep wrote: but came to a different conclusion to you
That's fair. But several other people, if you read their responses, also thought he was rude.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, no problem. I fear this will become as painful as any joke which is explained, but no matter - such is life.
"I cannot vote for spam Lounge messages. But I can post my own spam."
I consider the ability to help cull spam higher in importance than that of the ability to create it. I therefore would consider it reasonable if a different permission level was required, that the higher of the two should apply to the content-creation, rather than the flagging operation. So that's funny #1 for me.
"I can also approve an articles for publishing, but it is not interesting."
A perfect example of self-deprecation. Like many forms of humour, this can be subjectively funny - some will always have a distaste for it, others will always find it amusing - same goes for slap-stick or other forms of physical comedy. Funny #2 for moi.
"So, I prefer to leave my address unconfirmed, and post the spam."
I perceive the tone of this statement to be one that (made in jest) implies that it is the belief of Alex that he's just a lowly member (see #2) without the ability to kill spam, but with the permissions to create it. Therefore, it's creation is both permissible and sanctioned. This appears to be an attempt to make himself out to be an idiot - yet another example of self-deprecation. My funny #3 right there.
"PLEASE IGNORE THIS MESSAGE, IT IS RECEIVED FROM UNCONFIRMED EMAIL ADDRESS. And yes, my Shift key is OK."
An example of an imitation of a spammer, made with full confidence as a result of the absurd proposition in #3 that such behaviour is okay. The correctly capitalized sentence at the end only further serves to refine the imitation of a shameless spammer. I consider this funny #4 and #5.
While I find it less accessible than many other jokes here (and to be perfectly frank, somewhat juvenile) it seems genuinely odd to me that such a post would be seen as anything other than a (perhaps clumsy) attempt at a joke.
--
You're someone I consider to be level-headed and rarely disagree with or take exception to the thoughts you express here. As always, perceptions and opinions vary. I certainly don't consider yours any less valid than my own. We all have to get along after all. Sometimes the middle-ground suits no-one, but is the region that does so by the smallest amount. If the consensus is that posts of the tone Alex uses are unwelcome, then so be it. I'm happy to both abide by and disagree with said consensus.
"When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, and I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you put way more effort into interpreting that message than I did.
Although, he did claim he was serious, http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=5065085#xx5065085xx[^], but then again, he could have been sarcastic. No way to know.
If it is indeed humor, it's definitely lost on me.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You a strange one. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps I did, who knows. It seemed straight-forward to me given my personality and experiences.
Okay, you've got me at a loss on that one. I don't really know how to take it. Going on my guess for the rest of the posts in this thread, I'm going with "I don't get it, but we'll see how the follow-up aids in understanding. It might be funny or just plain rude - the jury's still out"
My sense of humour is often rather different from those I'm in physical contact with. I appreciate the chance to learn about our differences by examining the things over which we disagree. While hating much of it - I appreciate time spent with people I don't particularly like, since it often teaches me more about myself than like-minded people do. Humour can be quite the same - sometimes it provides insight into what makes me tick, other times the insight I gain is into others. (And to be perfectly clear, I've enjoyed the exchanges you and I have had - but not because I dislike you - I dont. But because you're generally level-headed and I gain insight from your approach to many discussions)
And if anyone says we should get a room, they can gtfo - letting someone know you appreciate them doesn't happen nearly enough in the parts of the world I frequent.
"When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, and I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
2 out of 3 have felt it to be a rant. However, even with his responses to your comments I still can't tell if he's joking or not.
I give up.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I still can't tell if he's joking or not.
He said he was not joking. I have no reason to doubt him.
Looks like he found some inconsistency and decided that the way to communicate this would be a rant. When pointed out where to report the inconsistency, it is no longer important.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
